The World Wars clearly illustrate the lengths that have been taken in a attempt to acquire power and fame. However, other social setting have been able to peaceful elect their leaders successful without any strife. A question is then raised on the different scenarios that lead to peace or war among the people. Philosophers went a step further to study the reasons behind the behavior of people leading them to act in a certain way and the mindset involved. Some of them focused on the politics of the people and especially their leaders who determined the political environment of their citizens. Machiavelli was one such individual who drew some conclusions on qualities that led to a successful ruler. We shall discuss his theories at a critical angle and justify his conclusions. Machiavelli was born at a time when the political situation of his time was filled with devious acts of tyranny and dictatorship. The leaders of his time including the Pope took over power by means of force and treachery without the slightest hint of apology to the people involved. The citizens took second place in their fight for supremacy and their welfare, including the prosperity of their countries was a dismissal subject. These events lead Machiavelli to look back at past leadership regimes and the impact of their rule on society. He gives an example of Cesare Borgia and states, ‘‘Cesare Borgia was accounted cruel; nevertheless, this cruelty of his reformed Romagna, brought it unity, and restored order and obedience….’’1. It is clear from the quote that the philosopher was only trying to be reasonable in his approach to the situation at hand. He justified the means to the ultimate end as was core understanding of politics. As a politician himself, Machiavelli decided to resign from public office and write guidelines on successful qualities of leaders as he saw fit at the time. He begins by outlining that a ruler must possess the qualities of virtu and Fortuna. By way of virtu, one is able to control the status of his leadership and assert himself among his people. This was not the traditional virtuous way of leading, but an unconventional stand in which one uses any means possible to establish their rule. Such means are at times violent and harmful to the people but they sometimes arrived at the desired results as was initially intended. Andrew in his book writes, ‘As such, when he talks about “virtue,” he tends to mean, not moral goodness or Christian piety, but skill required to keep control of one’s kingdom.’2 He goes ahead to explain that the functionality of the two factors go hand in hand with each other thus one has to be able to prepare for future outcomes by influencing their result. This involves adapting to the changes that may occur in the course of pursuit of power for the sake of being relevant. Those who are resistant to change could find themselves in ruin if caution is not taken. Such as the seasons of time change, so do our circumstances in life and we should be prepared to manage the results of those changes in society. In times of peace, one should build for themselves vessels of protection incase a turmoil develops. We cannot always rely on our luck to be in power but take an active role in ensuring our prolonged stay. The other notion of Machiavelli insists that leaders should separate their innate morality from their actions in
Virtues a successful ruler has according to Machiavelli Name: Institution: A ruler stands for the ultimate rule of any social setting with his power being revered by his subjects irrespective of their liking towards him or her. The leadership he confers to his people determines the length of his term in office or reign over time…
In the 1500’s, an Italian of noble ancestors rose to be in line with the rulers of his time. He is Niccolo Machiavelli, whose The Prince envisioned a leader in its perfect form in terms of success of ruling. Machiavellian thought undermines the modern political philosophy which basically governs the constitution of most powerful nations
Instead they should only work out such a scheme which allows them to highlight their virtues and simultaneously sideline their flaws. But though the Machiavellian argument supports blind throne domination in authority, it has its own drawbacks.
Florentine state, and Voltaire traveled to various European countries. However it is possible that, though coming from geographically and chronologically separate places, they may have shared some ideas, despite the differences of their backgrounds and the more than 200 years which separate their births
This issue is of high relevance in the modern political context, when the rulers of different countries do not keep their words, but only developing a tricky campaign, which promotes and popularizes their hidden intentions and the real essence. Machiavelli’s famous work “The Prince” was acknowledged only after his death, but this great political actor and thinker, who was an outstanding patriot, managed to develop his unique ideas, inspiring great rulers of the word.
Machiavelli in his most famous writing the prince presents a distinctive point of view. He gives straight positions on how the government should function and how the citizens should respond. He depicts the qualities of the prince in a clear manner stating the consequences of not following these qualities.
He was born in 1469 in Italy and brought through the very fundamental education system in the middle class of Renaissance (Constantine, 2011). He furthered his studies and studied business mathematics which earned him a job as a banker at Florentine bank in Rome where he worked for seven years.
Peace and order in a state are determined by the qualities of the leaders and the reactions of the public to the government. The most common times in a state are those of conflicts between the leaders and the public because of differing interests. Therefore, in order to achieve peace in a country, the leaders and the public should be in agreement (Machiavelli, Bondanella and Musa 1979, 35).
Virtues hold an important place in the society since it keeps the society free of crimes and vices by defining the set of rules which the citizens can abide by. Virtues also leads to a life filled with happiness rather than momentary
flicts, Machiavelli sought to highlight areas of weakness and strength that had made ancient and leaders of the time fall or preserve their rules respectively. To present his blueprint on how to maintain power effectively, Machiavelli partitioned The Prince into sections that
ce, he had gone through a “strappado” where his hands had been tied behind his back, and his whole body plunged to the floor after being strung to a ceiling. The Prince was intended as a persuasion to Lorenzo de Medici, who had ordered Machiavelli’s torture, that
8 pages (2000 words)Essay
Get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Didn't find an essay?
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com