He criticised several fields and gave argumentative ideas including sovereign governments which this work will be based upon. Sovereign is a state of a people or societies where a group of people or a person has been designated the authority to govern. The sovereign body always has control in religion, finance and military of the society. In this set up, the magistrate does not pledge allegiance to any superior forces or power and he is according to the state orders supreme. The control in the three sections by someone who has not been designated as sovereign in the social sense may as well assume the position of sovereignty. As stated by Hobbes in Behemoth, he gives a difference between de jure and de facto sovereign. Hobbes, felt that naturally the society cannot be differentiated from state of nature which is always at war. This is a condition whereby people are being forced to be in contact without an authority that is superior. The presence of the sovereign was therefore meant to prevent this state of commotion. The erected sovereign was to be given the subject’s rights and was expected create peace by all means. The idea of Hobbes was that sovereign which is absolute had limited power specifically by power which was assumed to be greater. This power outlined rights to be forfeited and duties of the sovereign. Hobbies argument was based on the fact that a government irrespective of the state was far much better than the State of Nature. This is because he thought that absolute sovereignty as a form of government was a measure to prevent the coming back of the State of Nature and it could easily make people live peacefully, due to lack of friction in the association with each other. Hobbes gives a clear conflict between two concepts: an effective sovereign, stable and the need of peace and the denial of the sovereign the advantages listed therein. Hobbes, opinion was as a result of the attitude he had towards the England government which resulted to the civil war. For example they thought that the state could be limited in its ability to raise taxes and at the same time have the government, the government power was to be reserved in a pre-eminent manner. Hobbes outstands to be an absolutist in the view that he gives no room for revolutionary change whatsoever ideologically on the ground. One can in a violent manner plan to dismiss or overthrow the sovereign with the aim of replacing it with one that is new or change the form state. For absolutism, this is sensible. States exist with the main agenda of preventing and solving misunderstandings, confusions and conflicts, these should be done not by violence but preferably by the state. This is because the state is more organised, there are procedures and rules of conflict resolution rather than spontaneous reaction of the violent groups or individuals. Hobbes expresses his clear stand on the governments theory in his Originator of science that is Politically Authentic, De Cive 1647 where he argued that he had finally found out a mode of rationalising a roadmap into political characters and that a new mode of science had been created by him. Hobbes studied governments that were civil by paying more attention to its central unit of operation. He compared it to humans being both social and natural and thereafter gave an extensive evaluation their forms and generation. Hobbes reasoned that
Hobbes and absolute Sovereignty Hobbes and absolute sovereignty Thomas Hobbes has been considered a great philosopher among the England philosophers. Born in April 5th, 1588 and died in December 4th 1679. During this period Hobbes made revolutionary advancements in the field of philosophy…
According to the research findings it can therefore be said that Hobbes argues that society needs an absolute sovereign who exerts control over a wide range of areas, and whom the subjects are not free to displace or to disagree with. He considers this to be necessary because of the inherent nature of humans that leads to conflict.
(Machiavelli, 1515) Machiavelli wrote: “A prince, therefore, being compelled knowingly to adopt the beast, ought to choose the fox and the lion; because the lion cannot defend himself against snares and the fox cannot defend himself against wolves. Therefore, it is necessary to be a fox to discover the snares and a lion to terrify the wolves.
Is parliamentary sovereignty a myth?
Sovereignty is defined as the supreme, absolute and uncontrollable power by which an independent state is governed. It is the supreme political authority and the absolute power of the constitution to administrate a state.
The discussion is that these laws and concepts should not be based on absolute and static truth, but rather they should be based on a framework that is agreeable by the subjects and can be used as their identity. Rothkopf (2008) a prominent international policy analyst defines sovereignty as the reflection of the prevailing believes and values of a society.1 Citizens are obliged to say okay to authority by their governments due to the fact that the alternative, which is living without some form of governance, would not be ideal.
More so, Hobbes belief that neither limited government nor divided authority is a practical possibility arguing that there must be a supreme sovereign power in the society. Hobbes claims that any form of ordered government is preferable to civil war, therefore, he suggests that all societal members to submit to a single absolute, central authority in order to maintain peace and stability.
Hobbes Perception of Sovereignty and its Modern Day Relevance
A nation is sovereign in situations where its magistrate owes loyalty to no greater power. As a result, the magistrate is supreme inside the legal order of the nation. In every social society where a system of law is present, there is also most likely to be found underneath the assortment of political forms, a latent democracy as much as in an absolute monarchy.
The concept of sovereignty is some times tossed between reality and myth. After a thorough analysis one may have bend to the opinion that sovereignty is a myth.
When examining the history of Great Britain, one can discover that there
e laws and concepts should not be based on absolute and static truth but rather; they should be based on a framework that is agreeable by the subjects and can be used as their identity. Rothkopf (2008), a prominent international policy analyst defines sovereignty as the
According to Hobbes, The English needed his philosophy because of the way politics were tearing England apart. Variant opinions on whoever holds ultimate political authority is always the cause of civil war (Ryan 211). Hobbes proposes that the best way to end political
The author of this paper explains that Hobbes and Locke have contributed significantly to the field of political science. Both theorists tend to have similar views with regard to where power emanates in the society. They both support the constitution or popular contract as an avenue where the people give the power to rule.
2 pages (500 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org