How we are to think upon truth, is as diverse a topic as principles of biology or mathematics. I will examine this question in three approaches commencing from the debate of epistemology, a debate on literature and finally a look at the theory of correspondence in light of metaphysics and truth. …
However, diverse the topic of truth, a measure of its boundaries and applications is imperative but logically unattainable. Knowledge in philosophy denotes justified true belief. In trying to explain epistemology, philosophers developed different ideologies. The use of perception in relation to sense data to determine knowledge and, therefore, truth has yielded a lot of debate. For instance, direct realism holds that, the world consists of mind independent physical objects. Through perception, an individual is directly aware of the independent objects. Then comes the science that states, what we perceive as an object is but a reflection of light. Scientists justify their claim beyond a reasonable doubt, in which case the absence of light is equal to the inability to see the object. Perception is, however, not dependent on one sense for humans have an abundance of five. For instance, in the dark one can still hear when he bumps into the object, feel its texture and approximate its size (touch), taste the surface and take in its scent (smell). Indirect realism tries to distinguish objects that are physically real and objects perceived by the mind. Indirect realists achieve this by assuming that humans are indirectly aware of mind independent objects. Study of the human mind has revealed that there are states in which the mind cannot distinguish true perceptions from false perceptions. Such states include illusions, dreams and other phenomena such as hallucinations which are real to minds as if they were in normal states. These states, therefore, disclaim the validity of both direct and indirect realism. This, in summary, dictates that the minds interpretation of the light ergo the object and in extension truth is as far as the individual mind perceives. Idealism holds that all physical objects are nothing more than just a collection of sensory ideas. In light of this, idealist can contradictorily say that 1) we are perceptually aware of actual physical things, but 2) all experiences are experiences of mental representations. Justification and belief are not enough to make a premise true as mentioned earlier. This insufficiency results in the Gettier problem. Philosophers try to solve this problem for instance, some theorists suggest redefining reliability. Nonetheless, the state of the mind controls the senses in which case truth still relies on an individual’s perception, however, fallible. What then are universal truths? Are all human minds playing a universal trick? Truth is the relation between a thing, state of affairs and their supporting evidence. The statement made is as a result of thought and judgment which require logical constructs to determine, in which case appeal to logos is eminent. Many intellectuals see Correspondence theory as dependent on conforms of external reality, ergo, metaphysics. To justify a preposition P as there has to exist a balanced equation between the components of preposition A and intellect. The balance of this equation does not restrict to objects and facts hence can apply to feelings, emotion, and people just but a few. Correspondence theory can describe two approaches of truth namely object based and fact based. Object-based correspondence summarizes judgment (in relation to an object) as true only if associate predicates correspond to the object. Noted, two accounts in regard to predicate associations are pertinent a) forming a reference relation and b) forming a correspondence relation. In summary, believes hold true if corresponding facts remain valid and false when corresponding facts are void. The correspondence theory to a considerable extent is a defense for metaphysical realism. However, all knowledge has a foundation in which ...
Cite this document
(“Truth Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/65584-truth
(Truth Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Truth Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/65584-truth.
Embellishment is the major feature of storytelling. Some people believe that storytelling is a kind of lying. However, storytelling and lying are entirely different things. While somebody says lies, his intention is to misdirect the audience. On the other hand the intention of the orator in storytelling is to convince or catch the attention of the audience to a fact with help of colorful explanations of the facts.
Truth telling is a social virtue thus is a prerequisite to the creation of an ideal society. Everyone in a society must therefore learn to tell the truth at all times. However, this is not always the case as different scenarios present different diverse challenges thereby prompting people to reveal their facts sparingly.
The matter though is older than 2,000 years and even though philosophers have been struggling with the meaning of truth since before Christ the word requires elucidation. The exposition of truth therefore may be as varied as our perception of it, owed in no small measure to our culture, background and surroundings.
While for both, the state or the republic is the area of concern, the difference lies in how each conceived the foundations necessary for its realization and reason for being. Plato conceived justice as embodied by human beings that would result in an ideal state.
However, for O'Brien, story-truth is more true than happening-truth, for several reasons. While happening-truth may be what literally happened at war, the fighting, the death, the destruction; it loses everything that makes it human to describe war that way.
Trust plays a major role in patients' life as it is the only way that patient will be able to cooperate with the medical staff to perform treatment. For instance, the patient should be able to trust in the capability of the nurses that the medicines that are administered on them are correct.
The idea of context is, in many respects, opposite to the concept of truth which is the subject for study all through the history. What is the effect of context on truth It makes the significance of the concept of truth, a concept that many philosophical brains could not satisfactorily define.
Had the truth been subjective the learning process, a social process, would not have taken place as different people would have different view points about truth or knowledge, the building blocks in the form of truth and knowledge would have been in short supply.
Trust plays a major role in patients’ life as it is the only way that patient will be able to cooperate with the medical staff to perform treatment. For instance, the patient should be able to trust in the capability of the nurses that the