Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Why does Ruse say that Creationism should not be understood as a Science - Research Paper Example

Free
College
Author : quigleystone
Research Paper
Philosophy
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0

Summary

Creationism-science is an epitome of an oxymoron; a phrase that has built in it two institutions of knowledge that do not amalgamate. Taking the literal senses of the words that make up phrase is taking up a much bigger debate; the debate of religion versus science. …

Extract of sample
Why does Ruse say that Creationism should not be understood as a Science

The two have not had fecund collaboration in history except the uneasy relationship philosophy, religion and science had during the medieval period. Called the dark ages, it shows that combining religion, philosophy and science does little good, if any. The burning of Giordano Bruno at the stake for pushing the envelope past what the church accepted underscores the uneasy marriage that was philosophy (and by extension science) and religion. At the center of this discussion are creationism and why the philosopher and historian Michael Ruse holds that it should not be understood as a science. First, it is necessary to look at what creationism is. Creationism is understood as an explanation of the existence of the earth, the universe and all that is in it from a biblical perspective. Creationism and the Christian creation story found in the book of genesis of the bible are inextricably tied as it is the creation story that lays the foundation for creationism. Scientific creationism (which will be used interchangeably with creation-science) is the scientific explanation and vindication of the creation story. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

HOW DOES OUR FAITH IN RELIGION AND SCIENCE AFFECT OUR GAINING NEW KNOWLEDGE?
As a result, there have been conflicts as to the reliability of science or religion as sources of knowledge, which in turn affects people’s acquisition of new knowledge. In view of this, the aim of this paper is to show how faith in science and religion affect people’s acquisition of new knowledge. Knowledge can be pursued through religion or science, though they both use different methodologies. As stated earlier, research has revealed that conflicts exist between science and religion. Moreover, owing to controversial scientific discoveries, religion and science have been increasingly…
4 pages (1004 words)
Does the (apparently) Value-Laden Nature of Science give us Reason to Doubt the Objectivity and Reliability of Science?
In the paragraphs that follow I try to identify salient arguments put forward by leading scientists representative of the epistemology under review. Science may be defined as the human endeavour to explore, investigate and understand the physical universe. Scientific method used to gain knowledge of natural phenomena includes observation, forming hypotheses or theories, conducting experiments to test hypotheses, and drawing conclusions in accepting, modifying, or rejecting hypotheses. In antiquity, philosophy encompassed all knowledge. In modern times, science has become the repository of…
4 pages (1004 words)
Schools Should Teach Creationism
Evolution theory has had its criticism over time. In 1920’s, evolution garnered immense public support but still it stayed out of the school curriculum. A supporter of the creation science bought up a new debate in the 1980s that schools should teach creationism as a substitute of evolution. This debate is the source of all public debates in recent times concerning the same issue. Despite the arguments, public schools should teach creationism alongside the evolution theory. The students deserve to know the two theories of origin and make a choice, which suits them in accordance to the…
8 pages (2008 words)
How do you think the nature of law should be understood?
Likewise, every individual naturally knows that it is important to cover the body because it is a sign of modesty and integrity. Lying to somebody feels wrong intrinsically because we know that the other person is being misguided. Likewise, helping an old man cross a road just feels right because it lends a sense of satisfaction and happiness. Naturally, the psychology of human beings has been shaped in such a way that they can tell what is wrong and what is right and everybody would agree to it. As human beings, we have certain rights and responsibilities toward others. If the sense of…
3 pages (753 words)
evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia
In these two books, he expresses and defends his ideas on the nature of scientific methods, concluding that there are no ground rules on governing scientific methods. He opposed the idea of having a single rigid scientific process to which all scientific research is carried out with the argument that this would make science predictable thus denying it the opportunity to evolve (Feyerabend 2000). In this study, Feyerabend shows that new findings in science, on which theories are later founded, have enormous influence from past events, theoriesand facts. Scientists researching in a new area of…
8 pages (2008 words)
What does it mean to say of a piece of instrumental music that it has certain emotional qualities?
A musical instrument being an expression of emotion in a persona or number of characters, the listener is right to imagine, in accordance with the nature and development of the music, a persona undergoing an emotion or series of emotions, or a number of characters doing so. …
6 pages (1506 words)