It is necessary to think of oneself as one thinks of life after death and consider of what would remain of him after he dies. This paper is a philosophical discussion that there is no life after death…
There is no life after death. To discuss this consider the following philosophical arguments. First, the concept of dualism makes one belief in life after death. Dualism is a belief that people exist in both material and nonmaterial nature, which seem to be independent of each other. According to Taylor, dualists argue that human beings consists of body and soul, the later being the centre if character and mental element. In dualist, thinking the body is less significant since it is only a carrier of the soul, which survives after the end of the body (Taylor web). Some activities in our lives for instance to detect, to will, to consider are totally independent of the physical being, which makes sense in believing in dualism. Descartes as quoted in seven oaks philosophy website argues, “considered the human soul simple, indivisible and indestructible, and thus able to maintain its existence after the death of the body” (Flew web). One will tend to ask what form a body will take on the next life now that the body is no more. Dualism assumes that life after death is continuous and that souls and spirits no longer live in bodies. One measure to self is a solid form, which one must bear even after death. Therefore, dualism fails in this criterion in that the afterlife form do not have bodies to connect with, which means they acquire different forms all together. In resurrection, Christians believe that sinners get their punishments in purgatory and the saints enjoy in heaven. The enquiry one will ask is how a sinner in the spirit body will feel the pain inflicted on him in hell, or how a saint will enjoy without the physical form. These questions arise because pleasure and pain comes to the physical body and not to the soul. Assumptions in dualism prove that there is no life after death. Secondly, the philosophical believes of materialism is not a strong enough support in life after death. In materialism, persons are assumed to rejuvenate and receive the same type of body after death. The lives lived by the resurrected persons compares with their early life on earth in many ways. They live in a perfect world where they do all they want: good food, walk on bright paths, do not become ill, do not sin, and they have ample possessions. The major concern that arises is how the older person compares to the new person. Can we still prove it is the same person? According to Barnes as quoted in seven oaks philosophical website, “we cannot imagine ourselves living in heaven or paradise and still being ourselves: if our flaws are corrected, our disabilities removed, our needs and wants satisfied, are we still in any meaningful sense the same person?” (Flew web) Assumptions in materialistic approach of resurrection fail to meet the criterion of identity. The transformation of the persons who die to the new heavenly body without flaws, disabilities, or needs means that the two bodies are two entities altogether. To me, the process of life after death is an impossibility through resurrection. Consider a human being who is a cannibal. After death, will God resurrect the persons he ate together with himself or only him? William in ...
Cite this document
(“Philosophy of Life after Death Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/67204-is-there-life-after-death
(Philosophy of Life After Death Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Philosophy of Life After Death Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/67204-is-there-life-after-death.
Furthermore, Terence Penelhum’s article, “Life After Death” looks into different theories of what happens after someone has died, primarily in regard to whether or not a person can retain their self-identity and, if this is possible, how it can be done.
To understand Rosenhaum's premise, it is best to define his terms:
What people term as "bad" is not the moment of death itself, but rather the abysmal nonexistence of being dead. Further, the death of a person has no temporal duration thus, how can a person's death could be bad for a person Accordingly, Epicurus' argument is reconstructed:
The freemason then emerges as the bearer of this light but before he is able to spread the beauty and knowledge he has to look towards the eternal East -where the light shines and calls the spirit of the freemason.
The end and its inevitability for the Freemason is indeed true as the whole aura of the symbolism engulfs him in the process and journey to the East.And yet he is being carried by a "movement".
However, the fact that death ends life and any of its attendant benefits cannot be ignored.
Epicurus' ethics are significantly based upon the Aristotelian common place which states that the highest good is not valued for the sake of anything else rather then its own sake and Epicurus accede with the thoughts of Aristotle that happiness is the supreme advantage.
When the spirit is trapped in the physical body, it is considered a materialistic phase and after the death of the body, the spirit attains freedom and goes on to lead a permanent life. The Christian faith puts forth this ideology of life after death, as a means to attaining salvation.
Reported evidence in support of life after death is similar in nature in cases of near death experiences, and past life memories. An examination of the past life cases found in Brian L. Weiss’ books Many Lives, Many Masters and Same Soul, Many Bodies; Betty J. Eadie’s book on her near death experience, Embraced by the Light, give very similar details.
That means, I learn best when I am actively engaged in the learning process by moving around and involving most of my senses. I retain my learning best with hands-on activities and experiences such as field trips, doing experiments, practical
These religious myths explain universe organization in respect to its existence, the life and human destiny. This paper attempts to present African thought and myths as important to the understanding of the African being and human
The author states that from Gilgamesh, there are two world views that emerge from people and beings. First, as much as all human beings desire to live forever, the fact is that everyone will get old and die. However, when people can be given chances to become immortal, then they will immediately accept the chances to live forever.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Philosophy of Life after Death for FREE!