It is an intriguing topic, in addition to a debatable position whether indeed; the world is safer almost a decade after the United States and its allies declared war on terror (Merritt 2012). This paper discusses the problems that underlie the tainted image that the United States and her western allies have attained in the fight against terror. Governments around the world get accused of committing questionable atrocities to otherwise non terror squads within different countries. Countries like Egypt, Russia and Uzbekistan, got singled out in Human Rights watch groups as the worst violators of human rights to political opponents in a scheme to rid themselves of terror. The BBC report got based on a report by a Human Rights Watch Group in the United States. The United States believed that their efforts to fight terror groups became silent on human rights abuses. A complete disregard to the positives that war on terror has realized would sound myopic. The 9/11 attack in the U. S. soil was unethical and deserves all means possible to avert any other acts of such nature. Unfortunately, up to this far war on terror has not brought any more peace than before. My position regarding this topic is that this is a fascinating topic. The fact is that we are no safer than we were 10 years ago. The result of fighting against terrorism has led to abuse of human rights. This would not have been the case if America and its allies had stayed out of another war. As discussed earlier on the other assignment; this topic has to key different claims (Duffy 2008). The first claim is that the world is far much safer a decade after the United States and its allies declared war on terror. The second claim is that the war between United States and its allies led to denial of human rights especially for the people in the Middle East. According to Associate Press, Central Intelligence Agency final report: No WMD got found in Iraq. Retrieved on May 28, 2012 from, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/the internationalsecuritynews-mideast_n_africa/t/cias-final-report-no-wmd-found-iraq/#.T8MGrVIsE7A, the national and international security has been a matter of concern to different governments across the world. Since the September 11 terror attack on the United States, the United States government and its allies have launched a war for more than a decade; however, the gains made through the wars have come with a price. There have been reports by Human Rights group; that the United States and its western friends in the war against terror have committed a lot of human rights abuses. As said before, the first claim is a fallacy by itself. Hence, gets ruled out since it is invalid and has no any clear evidence to support it. Having put this position and the claimed evidence through the Scientific Method and Proving a theory steps; there are steps to which the claim and the evidence does not measure to the examination. This claim is just an assumption hence it is not applicable. This claim is, therefore, invalid. Basing on the two claims over this issue, it is more evident that the second claim is valid. The fact that the war between United States and its associates led to denial of human rights especially for the people in and around Middle East is supremely true. Grounding on the evidence from the survey it is a claim that is free from both formal and
The War on Terror and Abuse of Human Rights Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Abstract National and international securities have been a matter of concern to different governments across the world. Since the 11 September terror attack on the U. S., The Us government and its allies have launched a war that is running into more than a decade; however, the gains made through the wars have come with a price…
The War on Terror was dubbed and championed first by George W. Bush, former president of the USA, motivated by the desire to protect human rights and punish those responsible for the devastating terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 on the World Trade Centre.
His deliberate use of the word ‘crusade’ (IPO, 2008: 24) made it clear that this was actually a war against the Muslim world under the pretext of being a war on terror. This crusade was made to appear as if was begun following the demolition of the World Trade Centre on 11 September 2001, which was widely portrayed as an attack by the CIA created network named Al-Qaeda.
Since the end of Second World War, United States has been engaged in a series of conflicts including the Cold War, war on drugs and war against terror, just to mention a few. Various reasons have been used to justify the country’s involvement in the wars.
For more than a decade, El Salvador experienced a destructive civil war that weakened internal equality and the rule of law (Collins 27). In the aftermath of the civil war, the country experienced a collapse of the rule of law, lack of public trust in institutions, and the rise of armed groups within the country (Ladutke 40).
The war on terror is going on thereby making the political grounds of the country vulnerable day by day and making more and more people psychologically weak. It seems as if both, 'war' and 'war on terror' has given nothing to the people but fear and anxiety to survive.
It was an issue that has long been thrown to the government which was then under the Prime Minister Tony Blair. According to a news item written by Dodds- "Extra Rendition is a practice of transferring suspects without formal extradition proceedings that human rights groups say opens the door for third-party countries to torture and interrogate suspects outside international standards."2 The British society then was made to believe by the previous government that no such renditions occurred by denying the said allegations.
Indeed, as this essay will argue, the counter-terrorism measures which both these countries adopted in the wake of September 11th constitute a direct violation of the very principles of human rights and, accordingly, are solid grounds for concern.
The United States and the United Kingdom have been the two countries most committed to the War on Terror.
The result of fighting against terrorism has lead to abuse of human rights. This would not have been the case if America and its allies had stayed out of another war.
Associated Press. (2010). CIAs final report: No WMD found in Iraq. Retrieved on
obe, human rights activists have always focused on the enhancement of equality across all social contexts.1 Within the framework of this tenet, the main aspect of emphasis is that no human being is superior to the other.2 However, the reality is massively different from this
A good example is the surveillance program that NSA has developed in order to track down terrorists and intercept their communication. While it may be effective, but in reality it violated some of the fundamental rights that were granted to people by the Constitution,
1 pages (250 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org