You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Imitation or Mimesis as the Essence of Knowing
Pages 3 (753 words)
Name Institution Instructor Course Date Imitation or mimesis as the essence of knowing This paper intends to give reasons as to why imitation or mimesis is the essence of knowing, according to Aristotle. To begin with, Aristotle maintains that nature comprises of truth.
Artists try their level best to imitate nature by making it beautiful. As such, they make the world look better and beautiful. Aristotle acknowledges that artists are not only imitators, but also creators. To Aristotle, the world is not just an appearance with a mere ephemeral copy filled with changeless ideas, but holds the objective that change is a pragmatic process of nature (Francesco 62). In this case, he takes a position of creation that has a direction. Imitation is the essence of knowledge because, when it takes a form from nature, it reshapes nature in a different manner by use of a diverse medium and matter. However, note that this matter or medium is a copy of slavish (Francesco 77). Hence, Aristotle is a believer of change. Change is a fundamental procedure of nature, which he refers as a creative force. Art is a particular way of improving nature. Art has come along with poets who in turn brought to completion that which nature is trying to complete. Therefore, through poem, a poet becomes both a creator and an imitator (Prang 378). Aristotle maintains that art revolves around human imitation of actions. A poet involves an improbable subject matter, which in turn makes it a probable. ...
Not exactly what you need?