The writer of this paper seeks to examine the philosophical article entitled ‘The Case for Animal Rights’ written by Tom Reagan. In the study, Tom Reagan has based the argument for animal rights on a number of cases starting with the need for rationalism…
Animal rights violators have argued that not all living things have equal rights and that humans are superior to the others. They state that human beings have the rights while the other living things, especially animals, have rights only in the right view of the human being responsible. Reagan accounts for the need to have animal rights on the following arguments and sets of theories. First, the violators base their argument on the contractions theory, where the human beings are said to have signed a voluntary contract to ensure rights on themselves and close persons. The rights also cover what the human beings have sentimental value, and what interests them in the society only. Reagan argues that this does not adequately cover the rights of animals in the society from the actions of human beings. He states that in case the animal in question does not have any relevance or value to the human being, then he/she is not morally obligated to uphold or enforce the rights of the animal (Reagan, 1989). The second argument is considered as the cruelty-kindness theory that states that every human being has the duty to be kind to all the animals in the world, whether they have sentimental value or not; we also have an indirect duty not to be cruel to the animals in the world whatsoever. ...
The same theory also argues for the statement ‘the end justifies the means’; moreover, Reagan uses the rights view to contradict these statements by egalitarians, by stating that the end does not justify the means, in the upholding animal rights. Reagan’s criticism is valid in light of clearly rational arguments and analysis on some other theories on animal rights. He seeks to bring balance between the animal’s rights and human rights in the world. The sense of belief that animals have no feelings and humans have no moral obligations towards them is clearly misplaced. There needs to be a balance between actions to animals and the results, in that animals are living things too and have emotions and rights that we need to uphold in society, if we are to be rational. ...
Cite this document
(“Critical Review Essay on an Article About Animal Rights”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/68478-critical-review-essay-on-an-article-about-animal
(Critical Review Essay on an Article About Animal Rights)
“Critical Review Essay on an Article About Animal Rights”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/68478-critical-review-essay-on-an-article-about-animal.
There is not one blank statement regarding leadership and leadership is not the same for everyone. Some people are born innately with leadership qualities whereas some have to develop these skills. Regardless of inability or ability, everyone develops their leadership skills in order to enhance their overall leadership and this is done through practice.
Lovett, was published in The Journal of Negro History in 1976. Dr. Lovett is a professor of history at Tennessee State University and has written a number of articles and reviews. Through his extensively researched article, Lovett has presented a facet to black history that has been much ignored – the role of black soldiers in the Civil War of the United States.
Their efficacy in binding with a drug in solution is primarily due to the ability of the niosome molecules to form hydrogen bonds with the molecules in that solution. Avenues of future study include the use of niosomes for cancer treatment and vaccinations.
Animals in our time and from the past became part of our lives as pets. Some people, teenagers, adults, or kids maybe, take animals as pets such as dogs, cats, birds, mice, or even snake! But most are likely to have animals at their houses, treating them as workers and slaves for their good. Sometimes you realize that animals are not treated well.
These laws that give protection to animal rights also govern the treatment which animals are projected to in medical research and slaughter for human consumption. Advocates have presented different approaches on animal rights. There is the protectionist side that looks at treatment of animals.
The is a difference between the objectives of universities and colleges from commercial enterprises which have profit accrual as their basic objective whereas colleges and universities pursue to provide educational services contained by the existing revenue levels expended, even though a slender rise in revenue is desired by some of the governing boards (Houston, 2008).
Critically, when a society strikes that balance between these competing interests and characterizes that balance as a moral right it is the balance which is fundamental: The fundamental right of the animal to be protected against violent treatment and killing.
The movement for animal rights, which is also known as animal liberation, is the concept that the basic interests of animals should be regarded with an equal eye as with humans. It promotes the fact that animal should not be treated as property, traded or be made a part of any business transaction, but they should be treated as legal persons.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau proposed in Discourse on Inequality in 1754 that animals ought to be part of natural law, not because they are sane, but because they are conscious. For Kant, cruelty to animals was erroneous solely on the basis that
main characters, there was Jim, the eleven-year old son of Marion and Collin, who seemed to exhibit anxieties in having to face apparent ridicules from the death of his father due to AIDS. The main argument in the article was that people, who were left with the death of a loved
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Critical Review Essay on an Article About Animal Rights for FREE!