Should the ruler always keep his word? [Name] [Date] Introduction Machiavelli is a famous Italian clerk, who bore in mind creative and powerful strategic ideas about the relevance of reign. He was focused on the issues of power. From the very childhood and his early years he felt a strong patriotic charge…
It is possible to present power from an unusual perspective. This task was the most relevant to Machiavelli and he managed to open the eyes of his fans and follower and the coming generations on the real essence of power, and on power of the words. In the majority of cases Princes are focused on their own interests. They are selfish and prudent; they do not care about their people at all. Machiavelli has been focused on the relevance of the ruler and the meaning of his word. Further on this paper considers controversial and challenging moments of the statement that a ruler should not keep his word. A word of a ruler Machiavelli inspires readers. They love him for sincerity, unexpected expressions, feelings and emotions. Machiavelli claims: “One ought not, of course, to call it virtu to massacre one’s fellow citizens, to betray one’s friends, to break one’s word, to be without mercy and without religion. By such means one can acquire power but not glory” (Prince online). Nowadays, the majority of politicians are focused on power. They consider it as an enormous blessing and there is no doubt that even the modern politicians cannot look further than their nose. Machiavelli and his feeling of patriotism, multiplied by a possibility to exist among other politicians and clerk were the main triggers for further developments of his political ideas. Actually, Machiavelli described people as masters and slaves. A former group of people is more powerful and it is appropriate for them to take care about themselves only. Slaves, or common people, in accordance with Machiavelli, are narrow-minded and follow the laws of the ruler, like an obedient herd of ships (Bagley, 1989). Therefore, it is possible to suggest, that Machiavelli wants to describe a dual nature of a human being. There are two origins in the nature of every man: on the one hand, we choose: "What [classical writers] intended to convey, with this story of rulers’ being educated by someone who was half beast and half man, was that it is necessary for a ruler to know when to act like an animal and when like a man; and if he relies on just one or the other mode of behavior he cannot hope to survive" (Prince online). This explanation can be correlated with a developed system of people, i.e. Masters and Slaves (Alter, 1999). Masters know how to behave with their slaves; they impose perverted laws on them and they have no doubts that their Slaves would follow all their needs and wants. When it goes about Masters’ words or the ways of behavior, they have sharp minds and can easily choose appropriate strategies and the ways of behavior. A Master uses beasty features, turns into a lion and can easily conquer his enemies. A Master turns into a fox, when he wants to conduct his cunning laws and create traps for his Slaves. On the one hand, it is appropriate for a ruler to choose different strategies of behavior. Otherwise it is impossible to reign. On the other hand, what can be said about a ruler if he does not keep his word? He can lose respect and trust of his people. Only a feeling of fear can prevent people from real protesting. In this case, the Prince can behave in whatever he wants, because he will get no resistance from people around him. There are many things, which are permitted for the king, but these deeds are forbidden for a slave. Machiavelli claims that there are many sins and every man ...
Cite this document
(“Should the Ruler Always Keep His Word Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/69416-should-a-ruler-always-keep-his-her-word-discuss
(Should the Ruler Always Keep His Word Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words)
“Should the Ruler Always Keep His Word Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/69416-should-a-ruler-always-keep-his-her-word-discuss.
He established the Christian Empire in Western Europe which existed for more than thousand years. As Cunningham and Reich maintain, “Charlemagne was an able administrator of lands brought under his subjugation. He modified and adapted the classic Roman administrative machinery to fit the needs of his own kingdom.
The Prince was written as both a philosophy and “how-to” manual for Lorenzo di Medici, scion of the ruling Florentine family with which Macchiavelli is generally associated. Macchiavelli’s seminal work is concerned with the acquisition and maintenance of power, by whatever means are available and necessary.
This issue is of high relevance in the modern political context, when the rulers of different countries do not keep their words, but only developing a tricky campaign, which promotes and popularizes their hidden intentions and the real essence. Machiavelli’s famous work “The Prince” was acknowledged only after his death, but this great political actor and thinker, who was an outstanding patriot, managed to develop his unique ideas, inspiring great rulers of the word.
Elie is a staunch Jew who studies Tora during the day and the Cabala at the night. Elie remained closer and merciful to God at all times. Elie expresses deep zeal God’s faith by lamentation in the synagogue when praying (Bloom, 34). At the age of fifteen Elie witnesses painful scenery, in which the Germans in a brutal manner killed many innocent people who included small children.
Print. [The book captures a number key events that shaped the road toward modern day United States. The author has focused on some of the challenges and triumphs that the country went through in pursuit for a political directions. Some of the particular themes on which he focuses are legislation, equality, the rule of law and human rights.
The idea is one that highlights the belief that leaders are born, though the natural skills can be honed. It therefore contains exclusive elements that identify some as born with superior natures to others. It then presents itself as being essentially the archetype of many of the characteristics of the democracy (and even some of a socialist state) that are discussed in "Pericles' Funeral Oration" as recorded by the work of Thucydides on the Peloponnesian War.
He communicates his moral dilemma to his mentor and guide Lord Krishna, who in turn offers Arjuna a discourse on Hindu dharma. While the advice is directed to Arjuna, it is also broadly applicable to all human beings in different contexts in their
In this case, the Information Technology experts have usually been encountered with various challenges arising from issues of work ethics.
As in the case of Mr. Child’s, the main ethical issue emanates from ethics ascribed to information flow at his place of
6). This report, as the public expects, should be information true information. It should not be information that the journalist has some doubt about (Frost 2011, p. 6). This is why Helen Sissons advices