Non-human Animals Can Be Agents of Morality - Essay Example

Free

Extract of sample
Non-human Animals Can Be Agents of Morality

From de Waal’s account, it is evident that animals especially chimpanzees can actually be moral agents. The basic concept in understanding the ability of animals to be moral agents is the evaluation of how human morality is distinguished from chimpanzee “morality”. De Waal envisages that human morality develops from the morality of our common ancestors. Morality emerges gradually, becoming more complex over time, but human morality is different in degree, not in kind, to the “morality” of other primates. Philip Kitcher, Christine Korsgaard, and Peter Singer in their book Philosophers and Primates opine that human morality is in some respects unique: it is different in kind. They suggest that morality is often a matter of overcoming our nature. Korsgaard maintains that “A form of life governed by principles and values is a very different thing from a form of life governed by instinct, desire, and emotion; even a very intelligent and sociable form of life governed by instinct, desire, and emotion. … We have ideas about what we ought to do and to be like and we are constantly trying to live up to them, apes do not live that way,” (Kitcher, Korsgaard & Singer, 2009, 117). She considers that morality requires a form of self-consciousness that allows us to inspect and assess our intentions. ...
Download paper

Summary

Running head: Critical Essay Non-human Animals Can Be Agents of Morality Insert Name Insert Grade Course Insert 20 July 2012 It has been verified through a string of experiments and studies that non human animals can be moral agents (De Waal, 2008, 282-83)…
Author : bergeriver
Download 0

Related Essays

Spring 2012 Philosophy 323: Human Diversity and Justice Professor Abed
Marquis (1989) draws analysis to the AIDS victim who suddenly confronts the prospect of an early death. This prospect must naturally come with a degree of regret and obvious fear and distress as the AIDS victim can clearly appreciate that with his life imminently cut short, he or she will not be able to continue to enjoy life’s experiences and will be deprived of a future life (Marquis, 1989). Marquis (1989) also argues that the deprivation of a future life is also relevant to children and infants. According to Marquis (1989) no one will disagree that it is morally wrong to deliberately take...
14 pages (3514 words) Essay
Morality
The word Morality carries the concept of: moral standards, with respect to behavior; moral responsibility, referring to one’s own conscience; and a moral identity, that is one who can differentiate between his right and wrong actions. Morality defines the boundaries that have been set forth in our society and following them can only lead to harmony and respect within the society. It’s one of the core founding pillars of a sophisticated society as it not only characterizes what is right and wrong but also instills a sense of guilt within individuals. This makes sure that no matter how badly...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Non-Human Animals
He finishes it off with the fact that nonhuman wildlife can be regarded as no more than machineries with chunks brought together in complex ways. Centered on Descartes’ underlying principle, human beings have a very little accountability to other natures or the natural world, unless their behavior has an emotional impact on other humans. (Hergenhahn, 2005, pp. 164). Rene Descartes, seemingly believed that wildlife were, as a matter of fact, vague from nonliving objects in that animals were not emotional —they were purely not creatures who were sensible, had individual and perceptual...
4 pages (1004 words) Term Paper
Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible?
My opinion extends to other human activities that put harm animal which are not necessary, such as poaching or game hunting or animal fights. There is a fundamental moral principle which permits us to share a kind of equal treatment that concerns all human beings and with every kind of differences that exist between and every one of us. I believe that this moral code is not only limited to human beings, but also to other living sentient beings in our environment. I believe that respect for life even extends to non-human living organisms and that animals have every right to be treated with much...
9 pages (2259 words) Essay
Ethics Assignment
He further argues that all animals posses sentience, and therefore animals should be treated the same way as humans regarding any morally relevant interest. Singer equates treating animals lesser than human beings to other forms of discrimination like racism and ethnicity. Furthermore, Singer equates animals with human beings who have irreversible brain damage. The utilitarian views of Singer are opposed and refuted by Cohen. Cohen argues that rights can only be restricted to moral agents. To refute Singer’s argument that animals have equal rights to humans, Cohen proposes a definition of...
4 pages (1004 words) Assignment
Morality
The lies, deception, aggression, bias or secrecy exemplified by politicians and lawyers have a certain practical value as proven by history. The late US president Lyndon Johnson is the perfect example of the practice of lying for the sake of the good. Known by the American citizens as a “candidate of peace,” Johnson won the election, but secretly launched Operation Rolling Thunder against North Vietnam (Bok 181-182). Nevertheless, although Johnson did not give the citizens a chance to accept or refuse the plan, he did it in order to do what he believed was good for everyone. Besides, had...
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
Is it unethical to test on animals,even if the testing helps save human lives?
It is this conceptual framework that leads to the argument: Is it unethical to test on animals, even if the testing helps save human lives? One is convinced that the rationale for ethically justifying testing on animals should not solely be based on saving human lives, but also in considering the selection, procedures, conditions, and purpose or intent, within which animals are tested to serve the paramount purpose of saving lives. The current discourse would therefore be presented by initially presenting the arguments which state that animal testing is unethical, even if the testing helps...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!