You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Famine Affluence and Morality
Pages 4 (1004 words)
On Famine, Affluence and Morality Peter Singer’s essay article entitled “On Famine, Affluence and Morality” tries to point out the solution of famine is the moral obligation of the wealthy to donate a portion of their belongings to the poor. In his article, Singer’s primary point is that, if an individual can use his or her wealth to diminish social problems such as poverty without any considerable lessening in his or her welfare others, it would be considered not morally right to do nothing about the problem…
people living there. It comes to Singer’s attention that while most of the population in Bangladesh, many countries and people around the world have more than enough of wealth to manage. Singer then comes up with the solution that the people with wealth beyond their means should be morally obliged to give up a portion of their material belongings and give them to other people whose lives are caught up in extreme poverty. This does not mean that the wealthy will lose a significant portion of wealth, but only the amount in which that is too excessive for them to keep or manage. Despite the seemingly well intentioned solution that Singer proposes in his essay article, there are three counter arguments against his point of view. ...
Not exactly what you need?