Ethical Debate on Assisted Suicide Name: Institution: Assisted suicide is a controversial ethical debate because both its legality and illegality undermines most of the basic moral principles by which humans live. The main areas where ethical debates arise in regard to assisted suicide include political (in view of the constitution), religious and social fronts…
This is because they have adequate knowledge to assist persons commit suicide. The ethical debate on assisted suicide is not as recent as most people assume. Examining the principles of medical ethics sheds light on these issues. In the 4th century B.C, the Hippocratic Oath took precedence as guidance to doctor patient relationship. One section of this oath holds that the doctor should not administer, or advice persons to administer lethal drugs. The Platonian philosophical error focused an immense deal on not only the moral but also the psychological (social) and theological (religious) questions on suicide. However, the ancient debates on suicide and assisted suicide for that matter take little account of the self. Instead, these debates focus on the social role and responsibility of the person committing suicide. Religion, on the other hand, takes a rather different approach. In Christianity, for instance, killing is wrong whether done to self or others. The contradiction is that most religions hold the virtue of compassion with endearment. While other parties will use this same virtue to root for assisted suicide, religion still views it as wrong (Gorsuch, 2009). Philosophy, like most religions, acknowledges the human ability to distinguish right from wrong. Upon this foundation, a philosopher may examine the issue of assisted suicide from one feasible approach. This first approach requires that one assumes that all factors held constant, an individual in their right state of mind in whatever decision they make reflect their moral, religious, philosophical and by extension ethical convictions. As such, a person choosing death instead of life must have examined their options and tagged assisted suicide “best option”. Fernandes (2008) while reflecting on some of the arguments ...
Cite this document
(“Ethical Debate on Assisted Suicide Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/71118-final-paper-outline
(Ethical Debate on Assisted Suicide Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Ethical Debate on Assisted Suicide Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/71118-final-paper-outline.
According to the research while the various philosophical theories offer useful frameworks for consideration of the morality and ethics of physician assisted suicide, the researcher submits this offers a reasonable compromise between a patients’ right to some control over their own life and societies’ right and duty to protect the value of life in general.
The author states that the most basic reason for suicide, that an individual is miserable and decides to end a life that has become unbearable for reasons that are based upon how they feel within their life, is a type of suicide that cannot be socially supported in Western cultures. According to the essay, men complete suicide more often than wome.
Even after immense advancements in medical science, still we are unable to create an artificial life form in laboratory setup. In other words, the mysteries surrounding life is still remain unresolved. Moreover, according to medical ethics; the primary duty of healthcare professionals is to assist patients in getting rid of their diseases.
It is usually practiced by the patient of long time suffering who deems that the best way to put an end to his suffering is to terminate his life. Assisted suicide can be divided into active and passive depending on the role of the physician or the family member.
There are many patients who lead an agonizing, miserable deathlike life and one needs to keep in mind that physician-assisted suicide is just mercy killing for such troubled patients and the society needs to show them compassion in dying. Similarly, PAS raises questions regarding one’s human rights as it deals with the debate over one’s right-to-die.
One of these issues that trigger serious debates in different groups is associated with physician-assisted suicide, or euthanasia, which offers an opportunity for another person to assist an affected person in taking away his or her life. This has faced serious objections from various people in the society, while others are in agreement with the decision to have some people assist others in committing suicide based on the conditions that prevail.
Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) takes place when a physician, responding to specific request from patients, gives information (for example, a prescription for a fatal dose of sleeping pills), and/or the means (such as a supply of carbon monoxide gas) of
It is termed assisted suicide, automatically assuming all of the implications that the word suicide provides. However, in examining this concept, one can begin to understand that it is not framed appropriately by this type of language, thus