You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
compare and contrast skinner and moore's different views
Pages 5 (1255 words)
Skinner and Moore’s different views Concerning their views on determinism, below are elemental points that compare and contrast Skinner and Moore’s different perspectives. Skinner’s hard determinism According to Skinner, human behavior cannot be determined if we just only rely on internal psychological state, but things around us must be understood in a Scientific way, then we should learn to understand how things are and what exists.
So experiment and observation, highly empirical they are, but would therefore make sense. It is only through doing these based on Skinner’s point that we could understand when a certain thing happens, another thing should follow. This means things we see now are results of something happen, so there must something happening before we see things as they are. This means further that an internal psychological state exists only then that we could exactly determine it, but based on Skinner’s claim we could be certain it certainly does exist. Thus, Skinner is compelled to believe we have no free will, because there is “technology” of human behavior that controls us, and there are forces around us that cause us to create our choice or determine our behavior. Based on these, Skinner has two conflicting views: we have no control over our actions; we ought to behave in a certain way, which only implies we have choices to make, so at some point we are given the chance to control our actions. Determinism at this case seems to become incompatible with ethics, as Skinner believes forces around could either shape people as good or something else. ...
Not exactly what you need?