Socrates View of Evil Actions, Its Validity and Philosophy - Essay Example

This doctrine of Socrates is right. Suppose, if a person has a psychological problem and he or she feels happy to cut his or her skin, then in the light of this example, the doctrine of Socrates holds true, because by cutting skin that person cannot benefit himself or herself in any way. So the doctrine of Socrates is right that the person does evil actions to get some benefit.

In Philosophy, there are two concepts about evil. One concept is narrow evil and the other is broad evil. The broad concept of evil divides evil acts into natural evil and moral evil. Moral evils are the result of human intentions whereas natural evils do not result from the intentions of human beings. The narrow concept of evil includes the most despicable actions character and events. Philosophy is also of the view that the clash of interest in different people causes evil to prevail despite the fact all think it wrong.

In essence, Socrates was of the view that human beings are responsible for evils and evils harm the person who does evil acts. His thinking is right as the person who does evil act, does wrong to his or herself. Philosophy also asserts that human beings are responsible for evil acts.