StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

In response to Nietzsche - Essay Example

Extract of sample
In response to Nietzsche

Nietzsche further asserts that truth is a social construct that completely depends on human language for its existence. Since language comprises of the signifiers to objects and experiences in human beings’ life, truth cannot exist as a separate entity outside human experience. Necessarily a truth is colored by a man’s experiences and perceptions of the truth itself. When truth dwells in a metaphysical level, its perception is embodied trough human-induced language constructs like metaphors or metonymies, as Nietzsche says in this regard: “What is truth then? A mobile army of metaphors, metonymies, anthropomorphisms, in short a sum of human relations that are elevated, transmitted, beautified in a poetic or rhetoric manner, and that appear to the people after a long usage as fixed, canonical and binding” (Nietzsche 45) Indeed perspectivism is a crucial term in understanding the validity of Nietzsche’s concept of truth. Nietzsche claims that “truths are illusions of which one has forgotten they are illusions, metaphors that are worn out and literally became powerless” (Nietzsche 45). But the problem that arises here is whether Nietzsche is true. While “there is no truth” according to Nietzsche, the question is how the truthfulness of Nietzsche’s claim can be validated. Obviously Nietzsche himself is aware of the conundrum that his concept of truth may develop. In response to this question, Nietzsche assumes that truths are socially established collective perspectives about something which are collaborative with other human experiences. Subsequently there may be another truth claimed by a philosopher. But according to this different truth about something is the said philosopher’s own perspective which has been induced and modulated by different context and experience with which he or she happens to be familiar with. Therefore when a philosopher claims any idea or anything as true, he or she is prejudiced and ignorant of different contexts which might lead him to a different conclusion. In his book, “Beyond Good and Evil” Nietzsche discusses this very postulation of perspectivism and its relation with the philosophers’ prejudices about truth. In the beginning chapter called “On the Prejudices of Philosophers”, he comments that though a traditional philosopher may claim any of his idea as the product of pure reasons and, therefore, as something true, there can be a different truth, about the same thing, which is the product of different reasoning. Indeed reasons and reasoning can be different from individual to individual, since reasons themselves, in some ways or others, are the products of individual experiences and perspectives. Therefore, a cluster of experiences which is same for a group of people may give birth to a cluster of perspectives which itself may lead to a conclusion assumed as a truth. In the same manner, a different cluster of experiences about the same may lead to a different truth. The problem of traditional philosophers is that they attempt to prove their perspectives (according to Nietzsche, their prejudices) as the universal truth. Referring to this problem, Nietzsche comments: “They pose as having discovered and attained their real opinions through the self-evolution of a cold, pure, divinely unperturbed dialectic: while what happens at bottom is that a prejudice, a notion, an ‘inspiration,’ generally a desire of the heart sifted and made abstract, is defended by them with reasons sought after the event” ...Show more


Name: Course: Tutor: Date: Analysis of Nietzsche’s Concept of Truth According to Nietzsche, truth is not a separate and absolute entity; rather it is something like a conundrum that is induced and influenced by one’s perspective which itself is modulated by one’s experiences…
Author : aleenhowell
In response to Nietzsche essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"In response to Nietzsche"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Nietzsche - Geneology of Morality
Indeed, in Section 10 of his First Treatise on the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche brings the term “ressentiment” to the reader’s attention. As one might guess, the term is originally French but is a cognate with English in that it means “resentment”.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
The Differences between Nietzsche, Sartre, and Camus on the Meaning of Life
In Being and Nothingness, Sartre tries to affirm human existence to have existed before it has ever obtained its meaning or fundamental nature. The ultimate goal of Sartre in writing the essay was to validate that indeed “free will” is real and is existent (Levy 111).
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Nietzsche and Freud Views on Religion
In Freud’s book, “Totem and Taboo”, Freud postulates the ideas regarding the nucleus of primitive religion by adopting psychological concepts This research enabled Freud to form a nexus between the genres of psychology and religion. Critics have pointed out this fact as being instrumental for the rise of a phraseology called psychological reductionism in the schools of comparative religion .
15 pages (3750 words) Essay
Team Nietzsche
W3. Review the component inventory supply processes and make changes to ensure that ordering demands can be met. There needs to be a inventory control software program introduced to trigger the manufacturing department as to when components are running low.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
The three interrelated essays of the work trace the various episodes in the evolution of moral concepts, and the “Second Essay” advances Nietzsche’s theory concerning the origin of the institution of punishment. Significantly, the author deals with pertinent concepts such as guilt, bad conscience etc in this section of the work and he begins the discussion by talking about forgetfulness and memory.
1 pages (250 words) Book Report/Review
edy is first defined by the self – suffering man and the tendencies that characters have in regard to their actions and the responses that they take. Through this definition, there is a specific response that can be taken by the characters, all which leads to the end
9 pages (2250 words) Essay
German Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and His Works
Nietzsche has talked greatly about the variations between good and evil and says that good things are those that have a certain assertion over someone’s life and thus hold value.
However, he also writes that one cannot clearly mark the distinction between the two facets of life because what may be good for one section of society might be evil for another.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
For Nietzsche, asceticism is for the “sick” people, because it defeats the purpose of living. However, it is paradoxical in nature too, because asceticism wills the people
7 pages (1750 words) Essay
Nietzsche, Sartre and Camus on the question of the meaning of human life in a godless world
He argues that morality should not be noted as a collection of responsibilities entrusted by God to humanity but is a random system that changes as the human changes. In The Gay Science, Nietzsche points out
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Present and contrast Hobbes and Nietzsche's account on the punishment
cal look at the views of Hobbes and Nietzsche on punishment shows that the two scholars conceived the role and the purpose of punishment differently; while Hobbes viewed punishment as a tool used by the society to enforce social contracts, Nietzsche conceives punishment as a
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Hire a pro to write
a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Contact Us