Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Rawl's and Chamberlain argument - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Pages 4 (1004 words)


Subject: Philosophy Date: April 8, 2012 Topic: Essay Introduction Rawls’s argument for the different principle from the original position and Nozick’s ‘Wilt Chamberlain argument seem to differ from the logical stand point but taking into consideration the grassroots realities prevailing in the society and the requirement of remedial measures, the difference amongst the two philosophers is marginal and one related to the approach…

Extract of sample
Rawl's and Chamberlain argument

1) Explain Rawls's argument for the difference principle from the original position The differences in the political philosophies of John Rawls and Robert Nozick mostly relate to variance in their initial assumptions and system of argument. According to the different principle, it allows inequalities in the distribution of goods subject to those inequalities stand to the advantage of the worst-off members of the society. He is convinced about the rationality of this principle and tenders the following reasons for his stand: The right of each citizen on the total goods available with the society is equal. This goes to prove that he must have equal share in the material wealth of the society. What is the justification for unequal distribution? His argument is simple and straightforward. If the distribution system works to the advantage of the worst-off section of the society, that arrangement is fair enough. Rawls explains his strategy of setting up the original position through risk-minimisation. Elaborating this Dr. Jan Garrette argues, “The Difference Principle has elements of other familiar ethical theories. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Plato's Argument
One notable thing about the Allegory of the Cave is that it presents, although in brief form, a number of Plato’s philosophical assumptions. In this regard, I am referring to his belief that the way the world is revealed in our senses is not a replica of the real world but a very poor copy as such. This belief which forms one of the most prominent philosophical assumption is best manifested in…
4 pages (1004 words)
Ontological argument
Objectives: 1. Elaboration of the famous doctrine of Ontological Argument in the light of the philosophies elaborated by the ancient early Christian scholar St. Anselm, eminent philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-1650), and his successor philosopher Nietzsche. 2. Evaluation of Descartes’ hypothesis and its impact on the future philosophic theories 3. To analyze whether Descartes’ doctrine was…
10 pages (2510 words)
God’s existence, Cosmological reasons Someone ensures the universe is in harmony. The earth revolves around the sun. The sun firmly stays comfortably in its preset place, the center of a nine planet solar system. The solar system shows that each of the nine planets do not collide against each other. The Milky Way is composed of many stars, comets, and other celestial objects. Humans cannot reach…
3 pages (753 words)
Descartes argues that the connection between mind and body is a wholly arbitrary without regard to the laws of physics; for instance he demonstrates that a particle striking another will move in a direction that is determined by the angle of the first particle. In contrary, in the human body, there is no connection between the physical sensations and the ensuing mental reaction; he argues that…
3 pages (753 words)
argument paper
For example, we do not allow students to cheat in the exams or people to violate speed regulations just because they think it is a fun thing to do. There are laws which restrict such behavior which is considered moral relativism. Similarly, not donating to the needy can also be termed as moral relativism and must be discouraged. Another moral obligation which most people agree to is saving a…
3 pages (753 words)
Kantian Argument
Budeau and Marshal Bedau and Cassell Budeau and marshal hold that the death penalty is morally wrong regardless of the crime committed by the offender. Both opponents of the death penalty have suggested that when analyzing whether a certain crime fit a given punishment, one must look at the impact of the punishment. This includes both the criminal and the society at large (Bedau and Cassell 118).…
4 pages (1004 words)
Therefore, despite Socrates and Crito consider that a death sentence was unjust, nothing unjust can be done in return.…
2 pages (502 words)