Rawlsian Maximin Principle and Utilitarianism Name: Tutor: Course: Institution: Date: Rawlsian Maximin Principle and Utilitarianism Critique of the Utilitarianism establishes an intricate scrutiny of the social justice, which is developed by John Rawls in his first book, "A Theory of Justice.” There are weaknesses of the Utilitarianism that depict the need for an alternative theory, whereby in numerous phases of argument the test for sufficiency of the theory that Rawls discusses demonstrates its superiority to the Utilitarianism…
Rawls’s argument that we should maximin instead of maximize leads to a fascinating standoff, whereby the argument for maximin appeared not compelling, but it was straight additive maximization of utilitarian in a way that revealed the possible function associated with morality that people are expected to maximize. In fact, according to Rawls, the utilitarianism is not straight based on taking maximandum, which refers to the things that are to be maximized that is utility instead of the primary social goods. Moreover, the idea of maximizing the key social goods is not appealing, since it fails to pursue the maximization of utility. Therefore, the espousal of the ideal legitimacy in political Liberalism does not have an effect on the conclusions and arguments that are developed to reinforce the ideal with respect to justice as fairness in utilitarianism and Rawlsian theories (Arneson, 2000). There is another problem with the utilitarianism, which is associated with the tenuous association with liberalism, whereby in prominent situations of aggregate goods of numerous, people outweigh the few individuals. Moreover, utilitarianism appears to be committed to the majority over the minority, and it seems to be unfair or violating the fundamental rights and liberties. Therefore, utilitarianism retort is unfair since the mere handovers from outdated and pernicious moral conversions. On the other hand, Rawls’s arguments are in the first part, whereby he focuses on the conflicts between utilitarianism and people’s beliefs concerning justice and fairness. In fact, he provides diagnosis, which is unflattering in order to appeal to utilitarianism. Therefore, utilitarianism may seem to be appealing by taking over the model of decision-making that individuals make relating to their lives. However, there is a significant difficulty associated with implementing the model in a society with people suffering from sacrifice, whereby they are denied the chance to obtain the benefits. In this case, the official arguments, in the parties in the original state prefer the Rawlsian Maximin Principle, by turning the choice between rules related to making the decision under uncertain circumstance of maximizing expected utility instead of maximin. The formal argument of the Rawls’s assertion is supported by the psychological arguments related to parties in the original state that prefers the principles. In fact, ideas of psychological arguments related to Rawls’s principles do not have limitations of the strains of commitment, like utilitarianism. Moreover, Rawls maintains that people growing in a society governed by principles Rawls’s principles, they would end up valuing the principles and complying with them. Rawls’s principles are concerned with the worst off, whereby the society is committed to the well being of the well off. However, this is not the case with the utilitarianism, whereby it is easier to have the allegiance to a society, which is governed Rawls’s principles, compared to the society governed by utilitarianism. Making a comparison between the Rawls principles with the maximin rule and utilitarianism, there is a chance of utilitarianism given ...
Cite this document
(“Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 2”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/75753-ethics
(Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 2)
“Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 2”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/75753-ethics.
Personal codes of ethics exemplify a relatively new trend, when reflect the striving of individuals to fix their ethical commitments and beliefs on paper. Any personal code of ethics must include rationale, ethical statement, rules, and enforcement procedures.
This necessity is not only driven by precautionary measure to prevent the occurrence of less than ideal business practice that would diminish the stature of the business among its stakeholders, but also as a strategic option because businesses that are perceived to be ethical enjoys the confidence of the market and consequently the customer’s patronage and profitability.
It requires people to consider if their actions are right or wrong. It also asks people how the components that help them succeed, for example, compassion, integrity, faithfulness, and honesty are relevant in everyday life. Ethics looks at the fundamental principles and basic concepts of human behavior.
One of the major aspects that are adopted by firms is the code of ethics. This entails a set of principles that guides a firm in its policies and programs. Ethical philosophy is applied in every department within an organization. This paper aims at discussing the ethical
n than not comes with close contract with deontology that stresses on duty to rules and eventually consequentialism that determines the wrongness or rights from the happenings of a particular action. The approach of moral dilemmas rather than the moral conclusion proves to be a