Famine, Affluence, and Morality

Famine, Affluence, and Morality Essay example
High school
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 3 (753 words)
Download 0
Answer A Yes. I agree with Singer’s conclusion that we personally have a moral obligation to help minimize world hunger. There are various reasons for agreeing with Singer. The first reason is the duty towards humanity. Even though the world is divided by national boundaries, ethnicity, culture, language etc., all the people in the world are same on the level of humanity…

Introduction

The same feeling of caring and helping should be applied to people from all over the world. The second reason for agreeing with Singer is the fact that ‘developed countries’ have resources to help the hungry. I agree with Singer’s point that instead of terming the act of helping famine victim as a ‘charitable act’, it should be termed as ‘moral obligation’ (Singer 236). So much of food is wasted and thrown away by common people. One can easily feed hundreds of starving people with the amount of the left-over food by people in a developed nation. Also, people make choices regarding the food items and quality. This shows that there is more than enough amount of food related items available in a country. Hence, when a country has the storage of food even after feeding its citizens sufficiently, then it becomes amoral obligation of that nation, or people of that nation, to help minimize the world hunger. Instead of wasting food or throwing away the edible parts just because they are not needed for a particular dish, it should be given to people who need it. No sane human being will choose to throw food in waste bin rather than giving it to a person who is starving to death. Hence, I agree with Singer that minimizing world hunger is a moral obligation of human beings. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Famine Affluence and Morality
people living there. It comes to Singer’s attention that while most of the population in Bangladesh, many countries and people around the world have more than enough of wealth to manage. Singer then comes up with the solution that the people with wealth beyond their means should be morally obliged to give up a portion of their material belongings and give them to other people whose lives are…
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
We should according to peter be ashamed of our self and we should be guilty for our decision not to help those in the refugees’ camps, who are dying of hunger and due to lack of shelter and medication (Singer, 1972). According to him it should be good to help them and also not good not to help them. People who then don’t contribute toward assisting the unfortunate in the society should be…
The Bleakness and Humiliation of Our World
Singer’s arguments in his article are that the suffering and death that are due to the lack of shelter, medical care, and food are damaging. That we ought, morally, to sacrifice anything that is of comparable moral importance when there is the power to prevent some things terrible from taking place, for instance, one might get wet in order that he or he saves a drowning a child. Singer also…
Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” Analysis.
In the fifth paragraph, Singer emphasized that helping starving people is a moral obligation by people, but granted that it does not sacrifice anything that is “comparably” important. For instance, if by donating a hundred dollars in a foundation that feeds starving children and families in Africa would cost the life of your child who also needs the money for her operation, then one will be…
Moral Obligations To The Poor In The Article by Peter Singer.
According to him, it is essential that human beings bring about a change in their moral conceptual scheme, i.e. the way they perceive moral issues and the commonly accepted way of life. As he remarks, it is commonly accepted at the international level that suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are not good. In this background, Singer’s argument has great relevance in…
"Famine, Affluence, and Morality"
In his opinion, helping one another is human nature and we should scrap the notion that helping other people in itself means going out of one’s way to do so (Singer, 1972). In his argument, Singer explains that the concept of charity is there to protect interests that do not need protecting. Instead, helping out should be incorporated into standard human behavior, but only in cases where such…
Crisis Of Famine In Bengal. Peter Singer's Views On Our Duties Of Foreign Aid And Charity.
Peter puts these arguments forward by way of two principles; one of them proposes the extent to which death and suffering is bad irrespective of the cause, which ranges hunger, deficient housing and inadequate. Secondly, he argues that one is obligated to mitigate morally bad state of affairs if they are able to do that without having to sacrifice that with another with the same moral importance…