Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Critically evaluate feminist arguments against the present system of science. - Essay Example

Pages 6 (1506 words)
Download 1


An Evaluation of Feminist Arguments against the Present System of Science Name of University Introduction Feminist arguments against the present system of science focus on a science not habitually or consistently considerate to women’s interests…

Extract of sample
Critically evaluate feminist arguments against the present system of science.

The movement also argued that science, besides perpetuating inequalities between sexes, is excessively focused on rational positivism, specifically on matters of objectivity, exactness, and certainty that seemed in conflict with feminism’s political ideals (Potter, 2006), and specifically with the development of a feminist science that focuses on women’s interests. Feminist Critiques of Science Feminist discourses are stuffed with cases of gender inequalities, especially in the field of science. Since the 1960s, feminist critique of science have shifted from discourses that explained the likelihood of reforming the existing system of science to demands for a total reconstruction of the core bedrock of culture and science (Wyer, 2009). ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Arguments for and against Abortion
According to her, killing a human being is wrong. However, a fetus does not qualify to be a human being because it does not have consciousness (Ford, 2002). She observes that to qualify as a human being, the concept of consciousness must be present. Therefore, since a fetus does not feel pain, it cannot be regarded a human being. Therefore, removing a fetus is not killing a human being. Thus, according to her, abortion is not wrong (Ford, 2002). Secondly, Mary Anne Warren argues that a human being must possess the capacity for reasoning and self-motivated activity (Ford, 2002). Therefore, a…
2 pages (502 words)
arguments for and against the existence of god
I would like to defend theistic point of view contrary to the line of reasoning presented through the argument from evil. Therefore, I am proving that God is omnipotent, God is all good and evil exists, all at the same time. God is omnipotent In this section, the definition of God’s omnipotent power based on theistic perspective is integrated and illustrated. God is all powerful that he is above everything, and above every name. This would also imply that God could control everything, so he could either allow things or interfere. For this reason, he created everything and because he is…
6 pages (1506 words)
evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia
In these two books, he expresses and defends his ideas on the nature of scientific methods, concluding that there are no ground rules on governing scientific methods. He opposed the idea of having a single rigid scientific process to which all scientific research is carried out with the argument that this would make science predictable thus denying it the opportunity to evolve (Feyerabend 2000). In this study, Feyerabend shows that new findings in science, on which theories are later founded, have enormous influence from past events, theoriesand facts. Scientists researching in a new area of…
8 pages (2008 words)
Arguments For or Against the Existence of God
Mainly, the argument is based on induction. It begins with Aquinas believing that there is an order of “efficient causes” in this world (Reichenbach, 2012). This means that causality exists in this world and that this causality has a particular order, where one thing causes another and this caused thing also causes another thing. Aquinas then proceeds by assuming that nothing can cause itself because it would be impossible for it to be prior to itself. This then leads Aquinas to think that everything is caused by another thing other than itself (Reichenbach, 2012). This part of the…
7 pages (1757 words)
In this respect a feminist can be defined by this model as being a person that believes that this model fundamentally fits the given situation that is faced by women more appropriately as compared to the manner in which it fits the situation faced by men, this is regardless of the society in which the person is seen to be in. However, of note is the fact that this definition does not imply that all different types of feminists believe that the prime oppressors of women is men – some types of feminists tend to believe that the main real oppressor is the society we live in, and that men too…
3 pages (753 words)
Critically evaluate Rene Descartes's claim that the mind is not a part of the physical world. Could modern science help settl
This essay critically evaluates Descartes’s claim that the mind is not a part of the physical world. It also includes a brief analysis of the response of modern science to this classical assumption. A Cartesian Perspective of the Mind Descartes believes that the tendency to associate sensible features with bodies is a mistake developed during childhood. During these early years individuals acquire the belief that the physical world is strongly connected to their sensations, or that it has the types of attributes it seems to possess in sense perception, both sensible and automatic. But…
6 pages (1506 words)
Arguments against abortion
The controversy lies on when and whether abortion should be done and the extent to which it should be denied or encouraged. It is this debate that has caused other countries to legalize abortion, such as the US, while others, such as Brazil, still consider the procedure illegal (Naden, 2008). This paper argues against abortion, based on its conflict with religious and moral standards, and thus supports its illegalization. First, abortion involves taking human life away, hence tantamount to murder. With this argument, it would be critical to understand when life begins. Proponents of abortion…
3 pages (753 words)