Lifeboat ethics and human survival The article, ‘Living on a lifeboat’ by Garrett Hardin gives insight into the survival paradigms of human race and how the ethical and moral imperatives should be used within the broader constraints of inequitable distribution of resources across the globe…
According to Hardin, lifeboat ethics become hugely critical elements of human survival. Lifeboats have lifeboats have limited space and people in it can survive only if they do not exceed the number of persons that it can take up. Thus, people in the lifeboat must desist saving people from overcrowded boat or drowning people if they want to survive. The self-interest must prevail in the lifeboat ethics. The tragedy of the commons is perceived as hugely crucial factor that adversely impacts the interests of the people at large. The metaphor broadly refers to resources that are used by all people and as such, being ‘common’ nobody takes up the responsibility for it. Hardin says that natural resources like air and water are prime example of the metaphor. People use it indiscriminately but are not concerned as to how it should be saved for posterity as legacy for our children. Christian-Marxist moral imperatives cannot be applied across the board because world is crowded with imperfect human-beings and selfish people would tend to look for their own interests and which would ultimately lead to mutual ruin of the commons. This he has defined as tragedy of the commons. The system of common that affect everyone must be incorporated within the framework of government agendas and world organizations like United Nations, World Bank etc. The wealth and natural resources of the rich nations are increasingly being used to serve the needs of the poor through various agencies. Thus, they can become vital tools or platforms to promote sustainability of resources, with pre-requisite conditions like population control, plantation drive, reforms in agricultural area etc., while disbursing aids in the poor countries. Human survival is at stake because of extreme burden due to increasing population on the limited resources of earth. The rising population has led to fast urbanization which has caused destruction of natural resources in terms of deforestation, pollution of air and water, indiscriminate use of fossil energy etc. Thus, it is important that system of common must become more responsible towards their consumption of natural resources. Hardin has applied the theory, tragedy of the common, on the immigration policy of the rich nation like America to show how the good intentions of the government could adversely impact the interests and survival of the American citizens in the long run. He says that net inflow of immigrants in America is around 400,000 per year while illegal immigrants is nearly 600,000 which goes undetected because they offer cheap labor who can be easily exploited to make huge profits by the business. Natural annual population growth rate is 1.7%, out of which immigrants make up nearly 37%! He has also put forward very interesting concept of pajoristic system that creates unacknowledged commons that tend to worsen situations. It can be applied on the immigration policy of the government that continuously allows immigration. A time will come when the immigrants would be same or more than legitimate American citizens and the wealth from rich American will keep going to the poor immigrants till both become poor! Indeed, Hardin’s concern is genuine because after some time, the immigrant population will not only out number the legitimate American citizens but it would also lead to scarcity of resources, lower quality of life and no significant resources left for our future generation. Hardin’ ...
Cite this document
(“Living on a Lifeboat Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/76719-living-on-a-lifeboat
(Living on a Lifeboat Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Living on a Lifeboat Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/76719-living-on-a-lifeboat.
In today’s competitive world every organisation weather profit making or non profit, making or non-profit making is facing stiff competition. Globalisation has made the competition steeper. Every company must have a proper market plan to survive in this competitive market.
Nowadays traveling plays significant role in day-to-day life. Accepting democratic principles and opening borders for foreigners gave a great opportunity to explore other territories besides native land and choose the most appropriate countries to stay in for normal vital activity.
Governance and International Relations – Lifeboat Ethics
It is a fact that the world over the role of lifeboat ethics is a significant one. This can easily be seen within the developing as well as the developed nations where the divide is getting bigger with each passing day.
These exercises may also involve seeking assistance from a gym instructor in my neighborhood fitness centre. In this case, I can be attending the gym in the evenings and take a jog in the morning and this can be enough exercises. I will follow the instructions given by the instructor such as lifting the appropriate weight that will match my weight.
On one hand, it can be argued that a longer life period provides an opportunity to people to live long and enjoy the life over a sustained period thus contributing more to the society however, there is another side of the argument also which advocates that high life expectancy increases the dependence of old age people on other persons thus virtually forcing them to live a miserable life.
Hardin puts forward the concept of 'the tragedy of the commons' in the context of the system of private property. According to him, people who own property are aware of their responsibility to watch over it, because if they fail in this, they will ultimately suffer.
However the awareness provided in the foster care is not enough for facing the world independently, as observed by Mech et al (as cited in Freundlich, Avery & Padgett, 2006, p.64).
There are several areas the youth must be trained
He states that it is not the responsibility of the wealthy nations to help and assist the poor nations. To explain why wealthy nations should not assist the poor nations he uses the example of a life boat and compares it to a wealthy
Because life on Earth is shared by everybody; no single person has the absolute right to waste or use more than fair share of the natural resources. However, not everybody on Earth has equal rights or equal share of the natural resources.
It had been a problem in case of any mishap on ship that how to supply power to a life boat. Diesel engines had been utilized in some life boats to provide power. However, due to immense weight, cost and environmental issues regarding
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Living on a Lifeboat for FREE!