Socrates Argument: Crito - Essay Example

The unjust decision will also be a bad decision and will deprive Socrates' life of value. Firstly, Socrates asks and Crito confirms that unjust thing is unjust under any circumstances, even when responding to injustice.

Then, Socrates refers to a premise and Crito confirms that such an unjust decision will be bad as there’s no difference between bad and injustice. Therefore, despite Socrates and Crito considering that a death sentence was unjust, nothing unjust can be done in return. Next, Socrates makes Crito confirm, that when one makes a contract, the true way would keep the contract. Then, Socrates explains, that he willingly made such a contract (social contract) about sticking to Athenian decisions, and the philosopher lived a whole life willingly keeping the contract.

Now, in referring to the same state laws Socrates is sentenced to death, and despite the death sentence may be unjust, the injustice would be to betray the contract by escaping the prison. Such an unjust decision will only confirm that Socrates deserves the sentence, and logically, will deprive Socrates' life of value.