1. Can psychological research which explains how human beings make moral judgments help to justify a given judgment or action? If so, how? Greene (359) argues that human beings make moral judgments without reasoning first…
If the drivers are well understood, it is possible to justify the moral judgment using psychological research. However, some people will make moral judgment without being driven by anything but out of other factors such as influence. Sometimes, it may be impossible to differentiate if the decision was made for given motives or out of influence. In such cases, it becomes impossible to use psychological research to justify the moral judgment. This essay argues that the capability of psychological research to justify moral judgment depends on whether the motives and factors leading the judgment are understood. Psychological research which explains how human beings make moral judgments can be used to justify a given judgment or action. Although there is no clear reason, why people make certain choices and not others, people will tend to justify their actions depending on the circumstances. In Greene’s (363) opinion, humans wish to make judgments based on reasoning. However, most of them end up making their decisions based on emotions. Therefore, if the emotions are well understood, it is possible to understand how humans will justify their actions, or the possible reasons that they will give for their actions. In Greene opinion, (364) “People tend to have emotional responses to personal moral violations, responses that incline them to judge against performing those actions.” However, it sometimes becomes hard to justify actions since some people make decisions without even thinking. It is only after making a decision that humans try to reason as they seek to justify their action or decide if it was right or wrong. Since it is well understood that people tend to make decisions depending on their intuitions, it only requires the researcher to understand the intuitions of the person making the decision to be able to tell the way they will justify their actions. Since there are no reasons for doing certain actions, it is possible to predict the way people will justify their moral judgment. It is possible to justify moral judgment using psychological research since people will justify actions as wrong or right depending on how the society views certain actions. Aristotle (173-174) claims that if a certain action is perceived to be wrong and a person commits it, it is obvious that he or she will try to find any reasons that will make the action appear right. Therefore, it only requires one to understand perceptions of the society regarding certain actions to be able to predict or tell how the doer of any action will justify it. Another reason why psychological research can be used to justify a given judgment is that some actions are performed out of obedience and not reason. It thus requires the researcher to know the motivation behind certain action. If an action of political aggression is performed, the doer will obviously justify the action by giving political reasons. For example, a dictator is likely to justify their dictatorial actions by demonstrating why humans require to be forced to act in a certain way. A person doing charity work will justify their actions by finding reasons on how their actions are helpful to others. Additionally, Milgram (184) posits that some actions are performed out of rebellion. If the researcher understands the nature of person performing a given action, then it is possible to justify the action without understanding the reason behind it. It only requires one to understand the nature of the person doing the action to be able to pre ...
Cite this document
(“Ethics Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/76887-ethics-critique
(Ethics Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Ethics Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/76887-ethics-critique.
The Hawthorne effect was presented in the article as one of the concepts in Human Relations. It was described as a method used in the training of people in an organization and the workplace based. There are different variations from the experiments undertaken in Chicago by Elton Mayo.
There are many views and ideas that can be used to define what is bad and what is good. One school of thought defines what is what is bad on the basis of a set of universal and absolute laws. Another group define what is bad on the basis of relativist principles that are applied to the circumstances at hand to define what is good and what is bad.
A written code of ethics serves as a guide in helping to determine what actions are unethical, and what are ethical and prescribed by the code. Thus the navy' s code of ethics serves as the link between ambiguity and accountability. Finally, it promotes leadership qualities and the concept to lead by example, which is necessary for any successful naval officer.
the big number of people who cannot cater for their medical expenses, it gives the estimated reported incidences of the diseases in older people which range from three to seventeen percent.
It further points out that pressure ulcers has led to a significant morbidity rate,
The article makes sense to me. I can identify with the arguments of the author because they resonate with my personal experiences. The fifth estate has particularly flourished over social media websites like Youtube and
a novel unrestricted ethics characterised by freedom to do whatever one wishes; for Nietzsche, no action is bad/evil; all actions are good and morally justifiable. In my moral worldview, I do not agree with the Nietzsche’s moral worldview. This is because I believe that human