Animal Rights - Research Paper Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Animal Rights

In many ways, elements of this group wish that animal rights would be even further reduced due to the fact that animal rights are antithetical to their personal and/or political vantage point. Similarly, on the opposing side, there are those individuals that are deeply troubled by the way our current society disregards the worth and dignity of other life forms. In fairness, among this group as well exists zealots that would advocate for an extreme solution to such an issue such as all individuals becoming vegetarians to affect a positive change on animal rights worldwide. As such, as rationally and scientifically as possible, this analysis will work to lay out a moderate framework from which the author will attempt to explain and understand the relevant arguments that exist on both sides of this debate.
The following provides a brief summary of some of the arguments that each side of this debate put forward:
The individuals who campaign for a greater degree of protection and animal rights argue the following:
- Due to the fact that eating meat necessarily entails the slaughter of an animal, it also entails grief, anxiety, and a high degree of suffering on the part of the animal
- Raising animals for slaughter is an inherently callous practice due to the fact that those individuals that are involved in the process begin to become hardened to the hardships and suffering that these animals undergo during this process.
- Evidence from a number of physicians and studies have concluded that a meat-eating is not necessarily beneficial to the health of those who eat it. ...
Download paper

Summary

This research paper is meant to serve as a clarion call to humankind as a means to reignite the moral compass that has been lost and focus their attention on the moral harm that is being done to animals with respect to this industrialised slaughter and inhumane treatment. …
Author : ed48

Related Essays

A Philosophical Review of Nature's and Animal Rights
In contrast, Tom Regan disputes that there is a difference between ‘having an interest in something’ and ‘taking an interest in it’ (Varner, 1998, 55), which then implies that domestic species, being mindless species, have innate biological interests. Regan thus defined biological interest in this way: “the two senses really are logically distinct: A being can be interested in something that is not in his interests, and something may be in a being’s interest despite the fact that he is not interested in” (Varner, 1998, 55). This means that domestic species, having no conscious...
6 pages (1506 words) Essay
Philosophy: Animal Rights
This paper seeks to defend animal rights against Cohen’s argument that animals have absolutely no rights. Cohen puts forth the argument that animals have absolutely no rights. According to Cohen, to have a right one must be able to make moral demands and be part of a moral community. Only humans have the capability to perceive the moral consequences of their actions, and are reasonably aware of what the effects are to animals or other human beings. He bases his argument from this perspective citing their nature that they lack the capacity to judge moral situations like human beings do. This...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Animal Rights Essay
The abolitionist side present the view that animals have a right not to be property. The utilitarian philosophy focuses on animal suffering as they are denied their rights (Regan 34). This paper will defend the rights of animals which is against Cohen argument. It will also look at the positions taken by Singer and Reagan. Carl Cohen is a professor of philosophy. He is well known for his prominent contribution in philosophy. Carl argues that animals have no rights. He says that, animals are not part of a community of moral agents. He continues to mention that animals are in capable of...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Animal Ethics and Environmental Ethics
There are two model approaches, through which the environmental ethics conception of wild animals is viewed. Both approaches place attention on the problems facing the endangered species, though they advocate for different rationales, in the area of giving animals preference, as opposed to the protection of the ecosystem at their detriment. First: is the anthropocentric view to wild animals, which seeks to guard endangered species from the destructive activities of humans. The second approach is the eco-centric model, which places attention upon the existence and the effects of wild animals,...
6 pages (1506 words) Essay
All Animal Rights Are Equal
This is similar to what Martin Luther King Jr. argued for when he said that people should be judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin. Singer also argues that just because there exists certain factual differences between groups of people (i.e., women are generally physically weaker than men), that this doesn’t justify “any difference in the amount of consideration we give to their needs and interests” (1977). Singer then relates racism and sexism to a concept known as speciesism. Since racism means that a person believes their race is better than...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Critical Review Essay on an Article About Animal Rights
Animal rights violators have argued that not all living things have equal rights, and that humans are superior to the others. They state that human beings have the rights while the other living things, especially animals, have rights only in the right view of the human being responsible. Reagan accounts for the need to have animal rights on the following arguments and sets of theories. First, the violators base their argument on the contractionism theory, where the human beings are said to have signed a voluntary contract to ensure rights on themselves and close persons. The rights also cover...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Pick a stance on the rights of animals based on Peter Singer's article Famine"
The concept that we try to use to extract an argument for animal rights is the concept introduced by Singer that proximity does not matter. Whilst in this particular case, the proximity spoken of was geographic, .i.e., small child in neighbor’s house vis a vis a Bengali child, the proximity could also be in terms of species. In the logic of Peter Singer, animals cannot be denied rights given humans even if they are proximally different from the latter. Animal rights can find justification in theories of right that are embedded in time. It is interesting to begin this exposition by looking at...
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!