Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

How George Fredrickson would explain Sherman Alexie’s - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Undergraduate
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)

Summary

Fredrickson examines the ethnic relations and racial categories that have been in existence in the American history. These ethnic relations have been changing depending on time and the political background of America. …

Extract of sample
How George Fredrickson would explain Sherman Alexie’s

America has had different ethnic groups interacting within its land. For instance, the white Indians, black Americans and Asians inhabit some areas in America. Throughout its history, America has been in constant efforts to expand its territorial boundaries to the west and to other geographical locations. The idea of expansion brings in the concept of manifest destiny. Manifest destiny is an idea held by most Americans that America would expand its boundaries throughout the continent. However, slavery and the existence of many tribes hindered the realization of the idea of manifest destiny. Fredrickson uses four models to explain how different ethnic and racial groups that people view as different should relate with one another. However, this essay focuses on one of the models, which is assimilation. The essay will examine Sherman Alexie’s essay and how Sherman applies Fredrickson’s model of assimilation. Assimilation is one of the best models of explaining the racial and ethnic differences between different tribes living in America. Assimilation is an exemplary model of explaining gender identity and the best approach to unite different social groups in the world. The main aim of assimilation is to establish a stable American culture where all ethnic groups are equal. Good understanding of the model requires one to know some terms that the model uses. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

In Praise of Blame by George Sher.
He has a few theories about it and sets about to debating over them one of them being blame’s relation to character. Sher starts off arguing against the Humean idea about how blaming someone depends on the person’s character. Someone who has a bad character is the one who can be blamed about things and not otherwise. He has different point of views regarding this and debates over them. The Humean claim is that we can only blame people if their bad side emerges because of the negative qualities – or a particular negative quality - they may have. Basically, if someone is generally a very…
4 pages (1004 words)
Drinnen und Draussen, by George Grosz
At the left side of the painting (outside), people were seen as destitute, obscure, with a lame man with an amputated leg seated with a crutch held just below his armpit, apparently begging. There were more shades and the images of the people were not clear. A pillar supposedly served as a dividing wall to visually represent people from the inside, dressed in coats and tie, one with a cigar, and apparently dining in style. These people could be seen as having a good time surrounded by sophisticated and classy ladies. Other objects were clearly painted such as a lamp, a bucket of liquor, an ash…
3 pages (753 words)
How Religion would Respond to Today's Issues?
This paper analyses the ways in which religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam respond to today's issues. …
3 pages (753 words)
Reconstruct/Explain/Criticize an argument
It is a theory that argues against the means; happiness in this case, justifies the end. According to Kant, people should not be judged by the consequences of their action, which is to mean that the results of an action should not apply in determining whether something is right or wrong. Thus, according to Kant, the motives the person had behind their actions ought to be used to measure whether an act is right or wrong. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, is a discipline of thought that argues that the result of an action ought to justify the means through which the end was achieved. This…
4 pages (1004 words)
Reconstruct/Explain/Criticize an argument (PAPER2)
However, this is not in the case of Basic argument I. According to this argument, besides the deterministic being true or false, an individual is not fully morally responsible for their action. It entails various expressions that are: nothing can be caused by itself; for one to be truly morally responsible for his action one should at least convey a certain crucial mental respect, and nothing can be fully morally responsible. Therefore, Galen Strawson tries to explain a person’s action is mostly influenced by his character, his origin, his environment and cultural differences among others.…
4 pages (1004 words)
Is Socrates a feminist? How might one argue that he is? How would they argue that he is not? Which position is right?
Significantly, to an extent Plato promoted the notion of both men and women being equal with some of his views supporting this claim specifically in book 5, where he tackled on Socrates’ view that women have plenty potential as philosopher-rulers or guardians of the state (VanHeest 1). On the support for women equality platform, the foundation of this claim is his assertion that a human should be judged on his or her soul and not on external appearance altogether. However, there are more of his views that entrench his stand on feminism i.e. that woman’s biology should not settle the…
5 pages (1255 words)