You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Not Just Dependent Beings: A key premise in The Cosmological Argument
Pages 3 (753 words)
Name Tutor Course Date NOT JUST DEPENDENT BEINGS: A KEY PREMISE IN THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT Introduction The Cosmological Argument argues on the existence of God. It is a posteriori argument (an argument depending on principle which can be known only by means of our experience in the world as opposed to a priori argument which bases on understanding and reflection on principles which are independent of our world experience).
The first three of the five arguments are versions of the Cosmological Argument. The first is the argument from the fact that there are things that are undergoing change in the world. He conclusively reasoned that there must ultimately be a causative of the change, which is itself unchanging. Secondly, he started from the fact that the existence of some things in the world is a cause of others. He conclusively reasoned that there must be an ultimate cause of existence; the existence of this cause is uncaused. Thirdly, he started from the factual existence of some things in this world, but we can with ease, imagine that they might not be existent; that they need not have at all existed. He reasoned to the conclusion that there must be a being that had to be that exists and could not have failed to be in existence (Rowe 21). These arguments from Aquinas undoubtedly prove the existence of a changer that is unchanging, an uncaused cause and a being that could not have failed to exist. They, however, fail to show proof for the existence of an omniscient, creator, omnipotent, supremely good theistic God, who is independent of the world (Rowe 22). ...
Not exactly what you need?