Heidegger contributed one of his very last and short pieces of writing in his address to the 10th annual meeting of Heidegger circle in 1976 in US. In this address the question of technology was raised by him…
In his writing, he states that the world which is dominated by technology will also result in the forgetfulness and unawareness and he also asks the participants to contemplate and think deeply about the question of technology, its importance and also the possible effects on the human life. The technological change was certainly very significant and transformational shift in a short period of time and Heidegger attempted to capture the most significant aspect of the change by means of a concept called Gestell, which is normally translated as “Enframing” lexically meaning “frame” or “rack” in German, but philosophically it is a newly invented word which acquires its meaning from some of the other related concepts built around the root-verb of stellen (meaning to place); just as in herstellen (to make), & vorstellen (to represent), and also the word Gestalt (meaning pattern) (Ruin, 2010).
One of the most famous & talked about essays from Heidegger’s earlier period was “The question concerning technology”, which he delivered in 1953 as a lecture. He writes there, “We now name the challenging claim that gathers man with a view to ordering the self-revealing as standing-reserve: Ge-stell [enframing]” (El-Bizri, 2000: 86). The statement mention is surely puzzling and hard to understand. So in order to comprehend the correct meaning of the statement and the importance of the idea of Gestell as Heidegger believed, the statement needs to be considered in a very specific context based not only on his thoughts and ideas about technology but also his understanding of the meaning of being and history beyond those terms. Gestell is a German word and it was used by the philosopher Martin Heidegger when he was describing the elements behind or beneath modern technology. Das Gestell means enframing and Heidegger used this word for defining our current constellation of intelligibility. When some term is translated from one language to another there are, more often than not, changes in the true meaning of the word and at times such changes lead to major problems concerned with larger concepts of technology and then comes up the idea of “enframing” (Gestell). “In the idea of Gestell lies the idea of information” (Heidegger, 1982). The reason behind Heidegger using this word for defining the notion is that it completely and fully defines the idea. “By etymologically connoting a gathering together (‘Ge-’) of the myriad forms of stellen (’to set, stand, regulate, secure, ready, establish’, and so on), it succinctly conveys his understanding of the way in which our present ‘mode of revealing’ – a ‘setting-upon that challenges forth’ – forces the ‘presencing’ (anwesen) of entities into its metaphysical ‘stamp or mold’ (Pragung) (Thomson, 2001: 248-249). Das Gestell is a metaphysical paradigm and like the other such paradigms, it is also for determining what the world that we know of means and signifies. From the perspective of das Gestell the world is simply a place from where one can get resources. According to Heidegger, das Gestell is “nothing technological, nothing on the order of a machine. It is the way in which the real reveals itself as standing reserve” (Ralkowski, 2009: 159). “We now name that challenging claim which gathers man thither to order the self-revealing as standing-reserve: "ge-stell" (enframing). We dare to use this ...
Cite this document
(“Heidegger and das Gestell Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/7895-heidegger-and-das-gestell
(Heidegger and Das Gestell Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words)
“Heidegger and Das Gestell Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/7895-heidegger-and-das-gestell.
For Heidegger, philosophy or the understanding of experience is already embedded in the world, therefore centuries of conditioning of how we should interpret the experience are already there, making the interpretation not as unique as one would think because it is already influenced by history and other stuff.
Firstly, the researcher discusses how Heidegger defines enframing as the restructuring of natural environment using modern technology. Here, he tackles the issue of modern technology by understanding its essence. Thereafter, he separates the essence of technology into a simpler manner that can easily relate to man.
The latter is of great controversy when dealing with intersubjectivity, “that meeting of minds by which two selves take each other's meaning with reference to the same object beheld in common.” This is what intersubjectivity is all about, i.e. an account of the way a human being is molded or formed as a subject through ones own relations to other subjects.
He has a radical explanation to the concept always elaborating on the difficulties that death itself presents thereby making its analysis impossible. He believes that people lean best through experience (Heidegger and Joan 11). Men have the ability to experience all other factors thereby acquiring effective knowledge about them.
He made significant contribution for the development of ontology, i.e. study of being. He practiced phenomenological analysis of human existence in an attempt to access being, with reference to the temporal and historical character. He also discussed the nihilism of modern technology, and its generated society and tried to correlate the thoughts and perspectives of the western philosophical tradition with the question of being.
But this law and its consequences are not only not immediately apparent to the agents who participate in capitalism, they are actually concealed from them.
Das Kapital by Karl Marx was the result of nearly thirty years of work on the part of Karl Marx and his influences and protracted study of the nature of not only the capitalist economy, but also the social and historical forces that shape interactions among people both within and outside of trade.
Martin Heidegger one of the most original thinkers of twentieth century, had his main focus on Ontology or the study of being. In his famous treatise, Being On Time he gave a phenomenological analysis to being (Sein), human existence (Dasein) and later explained the Nihilism in modern technological society.
If the readers practice to be introverts, Heidegger is not only reachable, but will provide quality food for thought. Those who waver at the first step should not think about the marathon. Heidegger’s literature is for those
vity, “that meeting of minds by which two selves take each others meaning with reference to the same object beheld in common.”1 This is what intersubjectivity is all about, i.e. an account of the way a human being is molded or formed as a subject through ones own relations
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Heidegger and das Gestell for FREE!