Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

The views of Plato with Aristotle on the nature of universals - Admission Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : charleswest

Summary

‘Universals’ are general ideas according to the medieval philosophy. The dispute about the universals discussed whether they are objectively real or they are only the names of things. The problem of the universals with its definition first appeared in the teachings of Plato. …

Extract of sample
The views of Plato with Aristotle on the nature of universals

He maintained that general ideas (universals) have a real existence, while the individual things that appeared to people really existing did not exist in fact. Ideas composed a special world, the reality of which was permanent and immobile. The ideas were the true cause of all things, their properties, relations, and, simultaneously, their goal. The general was dying in the individual specific things. Aristotle criticized Plato’s concept. Of the crucial importance for Aristotle was the fact that general was manifested only through the individual that was given through the sense experience. The ideas depended on subjects that could be perceived. As the essence of things, the ideas could not be separated from the things, essence of which they were.
Teleology is the philosophical doctrine of explaining the development of the world by the finite and purposeful reasons. Already in ancient philosophy, the processes of development in the wildlife and in the history were explained with special purpose causes. The principles of such teleological explanation were formulated by Aristotle. He believed that like the human activities included current goals, the natural phenomena included inherent potential target, which was realized in the course of the development of the phenomena. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Soul and Justice in the works of Plato, Aristotle and Epicurus
This essay discusses that Plato (428-347 BC) defined the soul’s parts as appetite, spirit, and reason. A just society would also have this structure: the productive (worker) class (appetite part of the soul); the protective (warrior) class (spirit part of the soul); and the governing (ruling) class (reason part of the soul). Individual justice would consist of the appetite part of the soul obeying the reason part, with the aid of the spirit part of the soul. Any deviation from this order would result in an unjust individual or society. Justice to Plato meant harmony with each fulfilling his…
3 pages (753 words)
Philosopher's Biography: Aristotle
The records found from his sculpture reveal that Aristotle was born in 384 B.C. in Stagira, Charlidice. “The illustration of Aristotle is based on a Roman copy of an original Greek sculpture by Lysippos (c. 330 BC), located in the Louvre Museum in Paris; Lysippos was Alexander’s court sculptor.” (Keltz, 2009: 13) He belonged to a respectable family of ancient Greece, where his father Nicomachus enjoyed the status of personal physician of the Macedonian King Amyntas, the grandfather of eminent conqueror Alexander the Great. It clearly shows that Aristotle’s ancestors were highly…
7 pages (1757 words)
Aristotle and Plato on Realism
When Aristotle and Plato are contrasted, it becomes clear that their efforts were largely responsible for the inclusion of metaphysical inquiry into Western philosophical thought. Both philosophers provided highly differing views on reality and the way it could be conceptualised but this does not serve to indicate that their views were altogether opposed to each other. Instead, there are fine lines where both Plato and Aristotle tend to agree and other areas where they tend to disagree. This paper will explore areas where both philosophers tend to agree on the domain of realism. Plato held…
4 pages (1004 words)
Plato and Aristotle Theories
For example, when we look at an orange, we analyze the particular orange and a universal form of an orange. Moreover, when we place the orange near a plate, we speak of both of them been next to each other. Furthermore, he also argued the existence of “unistantiated universals”. These are universal forms that do not relate to a particular thing. When we speak that there is a particular good in existence, for example, then “good” can be referred as proper universal form (Melchert, 28). However, Aristotle challenged Plato’s argument that the nature of universals is instantiated. He…
3 pages (753 words)
Describe Plato's philosophical analysis of the nature of knowledge, and explain what conclusions Plato drew for the methodolog
Of importance to note is that, universals are made up of a system where particular laws are made under an ultimate law. Moreover, the virtues involved emanate from a general principle, over and above, the mathematical theorems of one fundamental truth. It is worth noting that the basic categories in, which universal are brought together revolves around beauty, truth, goodness (Cooper 2). Apparently, goodness is the greatness of the three. Understanding the nature of knowledge must entails the idea types which it belongs to, the eternal laws where it could be said to be a passing instance, as…
5 pages (1255 words)
5 short essay
The ideas were the true cause of all things, their properties, relations, and, simultaneously, their goal. The general was dying in the individual specific things. Aristotle criticized Plato’s concept. Of the crucial importance for Aristotle was the fact that general was manifested only through the individual that was given through the sense experience. The ideas depended on subjects that could be perceived. As the essence of things, the ideas could not be separated from the things, essence of which they were.…