StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Plato and Aristotle Theories - Admission/Application Essay Example

Nobody downloaded yet
For example, when we look at an orange, we analyze the particular orange and a universal form of an orange. Moreover, when we place the orange near a plate, we speak of both of them been next to each other. Furthermore, he also argued the existence of “unistantiated universals”. These are universal forms that do not relate to a particular thing. When we speak that there is a particular good in existence, for example, then “good” can be referred as proper universal form (Melchert, 28). However, Aristotle challenged Plato’s argument that the nature of universals is instantiated. He argued that all universals are attached to existing things. Aristotle believed that the nature of universal can be predicted. This is because universal only exist its relation must have occurred, is occurring or must occur in the future. Hence if a universal cannot be predicted to an object that occurred in a certain period, it cannot exist. He also maintained universal location exist within each thing on which it existed. So, according to him, the form of an orange exists within each orange, rather in the world of oranges (Melchert, 35). Teleology is a philosophical explanation that explains the fact that the final causes do exist in nature. This theory put across the assumption that human action and is existing factors in the nature of the environment (Melchert, 123). Generally, this theory explains the purpose, end, aim and goal of the existence of something. Aristotle explained this theory by arguing that without artificial interference, an action will happen as stipulated by the natural forces affecting it. An example put across by Aristotle states that a seedling reaches to a level of the adult plant as its final cause. While explaining his metaphysics, Aristotle always argued that the final cause of an action or an object is already stipulated by nature and no force can change this outcome. Through teleology his argument on final causes were further explained. Additionally, Aristotle has argued against many philosophers claims that all things revolve around the necessity. By this statement Aristotle believed that the philosophers were against the purpose, end, aim and goal policy of teleology (Melchert, 112). Descartes was a philosopher. He developed the “Descartes Model of the Mind”. He argued that the mind could only recognize ideas. This was of great concern to him as he tried to show that the mind is only a perceive receiver as argued by Melchert (43). Hum on the other hand disapproved Descartes’ work. Hum argued that Descartes did not clearly characterize the cause and effect of ideas. According to him, there is no logical connection between cause and effect. For example if one looks at a broken flask on the floor, they are two separate ideas generated. In referring to Melchert induction is the act of justifying ones reasoning (77). Hum rarely used the term in his work. He only used it to justify some points he was making. Hum’s philosophy argued induction is the cause of casual relations and not reasoning. He also pondered on the justification of induction. Hum argues that induction must be valid. He challenged other philosophers to come up connections for their reasoning. The argument of induction by Hum is the current method used by philosophers to argue their work. Descartes believed that God was the cause of every perfect thing. This was the only logical explanation he could find to explain the nature of things. Descartes believed in himself and his feelings. This was due to the fact he was sure that God could not deceive him. He could not understand how other philosophers argued of subjects but not stating their origins. However, this did not go down well with Hum. ...Show more
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Plato and Aristotle Theories Admission/Application Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Plato and Aristotle Theories Admission/Application Essay)
“Plato and Aristotle Theories Admission/Application Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times


According to Melchert the term universal means a general concept (11). The nature of universals is argued by Plato and Aristotle (Greek Philosophers) in different ways. Plato argued that all things or a property have a universal form…
Plato and Aristotle Theories
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the admission/application essay on your topic
"Plato and Aristotle Theories"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Theories of Aggression
Frustration-aggression hypothesis, social learning theory drive theory of aggression and general aggression model has also been included in the present study. The paper also examines the impact of socialization on the aggressive behavior of the people.
3 pages (750 words) Admission/Application Essay
International Relations Theories
Despite apparent contradiction of this approach to the Realist paradigm, Liberal Insitutionalism might provide the shift that can bring about an end to the stalemate in resolving the problem around Iranian nuclear ambitions. (Question 3) Nixon doctrine, applied in the 1970s during detente, is a good example of how incorporating Liberal Institutionalism into foreign polices can be constructive and successful (Question 4).
7 pages (1750 words) Admission/Application Essay
Philosophy of the Mind
Student’s Name Course Tutor Date Philosophy of the Mind Introduction The topic of philosophy of the mind (dualism) which is referred to as soul has over the centuries been marred by controversy. The existence of the soul has been put to question and its relation with the body has also been put to scrutiny.
4 pages (1000 words) Admission/Application Essay
Philosophy Ethical Theories
Animals, too, have been the victims of inequality since the dawn of times, but they, on the other hand, cannot protest for their rights articulately. This task, therefore, has befallen on the shoulders of humans to speak for the unjustly treated animals. Certain groups of animal liberationists are taking radical steps towards the elimination of speciesism as these values and other human centred ethics have major flaws.
6 pages (1500 words) Admission/Application Essay
The views of Plato with Aristotle on the nature of universals
‘Universals’ are general ideas according to the medieval philosophy. The dispute about the universals discussed whether they are objectively real or they are only the names of things. The problem of the universals with its definition first appeared in the teachings of Plato.
3 pages (750 words) Admission/Application Essay
Social development theories of criminal behavior, crimes committed by executives at Enron
Various sociological theories explain the actions taken by the Enron executives. Among these theories the social control theory, the containment theory and the
2 pages (500 words) Admission/Application Essay
5 short essay
Moreover, when we place the orange near a plate, we speak of both of them been next to each other. Furthermore, he also argued the existence of “unistantiated
3 pages (750 words) Admission/Application Essay
Similarities and Differences between Aristotles and Platos Ideal City State
The author of the investigation draws the differences and similarities in the ideals and principles that both Aristotle and Plato share. Reportedly, Aristotle critically examines the political institutions in his time and in the Greek world while Plato, on the other hand, considered the Greek city-state of Polis was not as perfect as the Greek would like to believe.
4 pages (1000 words) Admission/Application Essay
Discuss the arguments put into the mouth of Socrates by Plato in his dialogues, Symposium and Phaedrus. What is the purpose of love What form does love initially take What does it grow into Why do we experience love In order to answer this question,
Socrates explains that love arises from the union of resources and poverty. In this context, poverty refers to any form of deprivation. Love therefore grows turning into an
1 pages (250 words) Admission/Application Essay
Discuss the arguments put into the mouth of Socrates by Plato in his dialogues, Symposium and Phaedrus. What is the purpose of love What form does love initially take What does it grow into Why do we experience love In order to answer this question,
He uses different characters in a dramatic way to bring out different aspects of love including Socrates to show the philosophical nature of love in the native Athenian community. In his speech at the symposium, Socrates describes the
1 pages (250 words) Admission/Application Essay
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Let us find you another Admission/Application Essay on topic Plato and Aristotle Theories for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us