What Is Hume’s Theory Regarding Causation? How Does It Show The Limits Of Human Understanding?

What Is Hume’s Theory Regarding Causation? How Does It Show The Limits Of Human Understanding? Essay example
College
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
The problem with philosophers like Hume is simple. They think up to the physical, mental and intellectual levels. At this stage they find themselves blocked. They are unable to transcend the mind level, and enter the realm of bliss…

Introduction

They try to knock at the levels of spirituality, but due to their egoistic approach of trying to know the necessary connection, they get stuck up. They are unable to transcend the mind level, and enter the realm of bliss, where there are no differences. It is the conflict-free zone. For every mind-level argument there is a counter argument. By such arguments the solution is impossibility. Whether the philosophers like Hume agree or not, theory regarding Causation cannot be solved by applying secular methods of proofs. Human understanding, power of discriminations has limitations. “The Philosopher David Hume is famous for making us realize that until we know the Necessary Connection / cause of things then all human knowledge is uncertain, merely a habit of thinking based upon repeated observation (induction), and which depends upon the future being like the past.” This is an example of getting stuck at the mind-level. By mind-level thinking, the functioning and limitations of the mind cannot be understood. The power that is above the mind can only understand and control the mind. For example, the Major in the army takes orders from Colonel, the higher authority.
Further, look at the wavering mind and how David Hume tries to grope in the dark, hankering to see the light. “I must confess that a man is guilty of unpardonable arrogance who concludes, because an argument has escaped his own investigation, that therefore it does not really exist. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Questions on Philosophy
What problem did Kant find with traditional metaphysics and how does he aim to solve it? (Think Descartes on this also) He thinks he is writing for metaphysicians and Hume because Hume is skeptic about the possibility of metaphysics (SparkNotes Editors). 3. How is it that Hume awoke Kant from his “dogmatic slumber?” What was it about Hume’s philosophy that was so awakening to Kant? What were…
Theory Analysis - Watson's Theory of Human Care
History The Watson’s Theory of Human Care had started taking its form through the evolution of philosophies of Dr. Jean Watson. In 1979 she gave the concept of 10 carative factors of nursing. Since then her theories have undergone several changes, though the salient framework of the theories have remained consistent. The factors mentioned above were based on philosophy, science and the art of…
Philosophical Beliefs Regarding Human Knowledge
Philosophy as a discipline is the art of rationalizing. Rationalizing refers to the art of analyzing on an in depth the premises laid in front of an argument. Through thorough analysis reach out on wisely chosen conclusions and further more solve problems of the community. It needs one to be a critical thinker to be a good philosopher. Critical thinkers are at the highest level of thinking (Mill,…
David Hume's An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
On the other hand, Hume tells of ideas as being part of a copy principle from impressions, which means that ideas are derived from impressions and they directly correspond to the impression from which they are derived, to create a complete image of both. This he goes to state that ideas are thoughts, beliefs or memories that are directly connected to our memories, which may not serve as much of a…
Why does Mackie think we need an "error theory"? Do you think he is right to believe that we need it?
The error theory suggests that morals are not absolute, that what is morally right or wrong vary from one society to another. It is a theory that states that morals are judged, not by the universal moral norms, but according to the society within which a circumstance calls for moral clarification (Dorsey 2006, p.495). When one considers the definition above, it can be stated that the morals are no…
Dialogues concerning Natural Religion: Hume’s Evidentialist objection to belief in God
In addition, I will provide a discussion on why Clark and Plantinga believe that the classical foundationalist must reject classical foundationalist. Finally, I will provide a discussion on the various beliefs that Plantinga thinks are properly basic. These discussions will provide a vista to bring forth arguments on Plantinga and Clark’s arguments against classical foundationalism. The main…
The value system How does it develop
Both philosophers, by using contrasting arguments and ideas, set out to show us "how to live" in society. Socrates was an idealist, and Machiavelli was a pragmatic realist. I will discuss whether it is in fact it is true that philosophy or theory has anything of value to offer in the conduct of politics. Socrates' argument is that philosophy has something of value to politics, but Machiavelli does…