Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

How might we (best) justify the freedom of speech? - Term Paper Example

Only on StudentShare
Undergraduate
Author : tyrique44
Term Paper
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)

Summary

The Course Date How might we (best) justify the freedom of speech? Freedom of speech, as a political principle in liberal states, acts to protect individual rights in countries with written constitutions. In the United States, freedom of speech exists as both a constitutional norm and a political principle…

Extract of sample
How might we (best) justify the freedom of speech?

This raises questions over the restraint of freedom of speech in protection beyond the minimal principle of liberty. In my own opinion, there exists no single justification that would be sufficient to justify freedom of speech. In this regard, therefore, I would advocate for various justifications based on consequentialist and non-consequentialist approaches. This paper seeks to illustrate various viewpoints to the justification of freedom of speech using the communicative principle (Greenawalt 3-15). Consequentialist Approach of Justification The philosophical position of a consequentialist approach contributes to desirable set of circumstances and relies on the association of facts between practice and the expected results of such practice. I agree with the suggestion that the freedom of speech promotes the discovery of truth as put forward by Stuart Mill. Individuals have the capacity to distinguish true ideas from deceitful ideas in reality in the presence of free speech. Thus, people would always demonstration careful understanding in settling for truth. In this case, any claims of value and an understanding by individuals of these claims of value constitute truth. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Epistemology: What is Knowledge, How We Gain Knowledge?
Moreover, “Y” is true, because we cannot know something that is false for what is false does not exist and we cannot know something that does not exist because knowing something that does not exist only means knowing nothing at all. So, knowing “Y”, “X” can have a justification or a clear rationale for thinking that “Y” is true and exists. This justification can be given through intuition, immediate certainty of “X” that what he believes, “Y” is true; reasoning, the act of “X” on proving that “Y” is true based on concepts on argumentation; or sense experience,…
3 pages (753 words)
Free Speech
This has brought growth to countries such as Brazil, Caribbean and the Middle East. It has grown tremendously with a margin of over a billion users in the past ten years from 670 million to 1.9 billion users. In order to promote accessibility to the nation, the government has invested large amounts of dollars to breach the gap that is between people with access to the Internet and those without (Hayes 108). By providing access to the Internet, more people are able to take advantage of political, economic, social and carrier opportunities. Internet democracy should be promoted as every citizen…
4 pages (1004 words)
death how should we think of death and dying?
He is especially interested in the dark side of life: guilt, death struggling and suffering. So I will argue in favor of Jasper and believe that death should be faced with courage by human as his inner nature is eternal. Death sets a limit on our time in this life, urging us on to do something productive with that time as long as it is ours to use. If one begins to see death as an invisible, but friendly companion on one’s life journey – gently reminding not to wait until tomorrow to do what one mean to do - then one can learn to live life than passing through it. To rejoice at the…
8 pages (2008 words)
Philosophy - Human Freedom
The essay "Philosophy - Human Freedom" states the human freedom. However, this formal agreement known as the law or the legal system and it is steadily and constantly developing and changing as the new circumstances and situations arise. (Sections of this law, normally those that deal with human rights, are actually less changeable and some times are referred to as constitutions.) Therefore, our constitution is defined and supported by the legal systems. A general fallacy the regard freedom is to automatically believe that it is a by-product of the modern democracy. The only freedom…
5 pages (1255 words)
Can freedom of speech, as an absolute right, be defended on utilitarian terms? If not, can Ronald Dworkin defend it as a 'fundam
.….10 Abstract This paper concentrates on the notion of freedom of speech and how its functioning has been elucidated in a synchronized manner. The paper also entails the analysis of how freedom of speech as an absolute right can be defended on the utilitarian ground. The last part deals with the critical evaluation of how the famous liberal scholar, Ronald Dworkin, defended the freedom of speech as a fundamental human right and how far he is able to achieve his goal. The general intellection of almost all philosophers today is that human beings with the virtue of their nature possess moral…
5 pages (1255 words)
What is the self and how can we know it, or can we know it at all?
Ascribing from the above definition it can be argued that the self refers to what someone perceives or thinks about himself. The self concept can be known when one becomes aware of oneself. An individual can know this concept when he belief on himself or herself and achieves a higher level of personal attributes awareness. It can be generally the self can be viewed o three strands perspective. First is the physical self who basically comprise the sense of embodiment, psychological self which is the ability to differentiate between self and others (Mitchell 56). Finally is the higher level…
5 pages (1255 words)
Ideology of Advertising
We live in the age of conspicuous consumption. We are proud of having an opportunity to buy more and more goods and products. We do not realize why do we really need all this stuff, but we DO realize that we really want it! A greedy worm lives inside of our minds and hearts and it eats out our moral principles, while filling the gaps in our minds and hearts with the ideas of greediness. It is better to talk about these related phenomena, i.e. advertising and ideology and explain the way they are related and what this relation means to us. …
3 pages (753 words)