You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
How might we (best) justify the freedom of speech?
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Student’s Name Instructor’s name The Course Date How might we (best) justify the freedom of speech? Freedom of speech, as a political principle in liberal states, acts to protect individual rights in countries with written constitutions. In the United States, freedom of speech exists as both a constitutional norm and a political principle.
This raises questions over the restraint of freedom of speech in protection beyond the minimal principle of liberty. In my own opinion, there exists no single justification that would be sufficient to justify freedom of speech. In this regard, therefore, I would advocate for various justifications based on consequentialist and non-consequentialist approaches. This paper seeks to illustrate various viewpoints to the justification of freedom of speech using the communicative principle (Greenawalt 3-15). Consequentialist Approach of Justification The philosophical position of a consequentialist approach contributes to desirable set of circumstances and relies on the association of facts between practice and the expected results of such practice. I agree with the suggestion that the freedom of speech promotes the discovery of truth as put forward by Stuart Mill. Individuals have the capacity to distinguish true ideas from deceitful ideas in reality in the presence of free speech. Thus, people would always demonstration careful understanding in settling for truth. In this case, any claims of value and an understanding by individuals of these claims of value constitute truth. ...
Not exactly what you need?