Such essential rights allow the citizen of United States as the independent citizen without any control. The expression “gun control” has different meanings for different citizens and there are some counter laws have opposed the condition for the last many years that gives protection to firearms. Under the gun control, it involves the rules and regulations developed by the government that bounds the right of the a gun users in order to buy, carry or operate the firearm in order to eradicate the negativities of the gun owning in the form of robbery, theft, abduction, murder and other criminal activities. This right limitation matches the Kant’s model that explains that the morality of the action depended upon the intention of the individual and not on the consequence of that act (Tampio 68). The issue under question is the limiting of the citizen’s right to carry the arms will not match the interest of everyone. For the gun control matter, there are two major groups that have opposite believes and includes individual rights and utilitarianism. Both the theories cannot exist at one time and it is completely against the utilitarianism to grant the full rights to the citizen to own and freely use the gun and ammunitions. By using this theory, the government derived the gun control rule that is in violation to the complete freedom and human rights of the citizen. However, from the constitution point of view, it is absolutely lawful to regulate firearms but on the ethical grounds, it is not right. The second amendment has the term “well regulated” that is subjected to many arguments. According to some people, the expression well regulated meant to be the controlling aspect or the ruling aspect from the government perspective. On the other hand, there are other meanings of the phrase which is not acceptable by many individuals. In other words, regulated can be considered as properly operating for the benefits of the country. It is no denial in the fact that reduction in the criminal activities considered as the better option by everyone. Gun lawyers are of the view that it is the possession of the gun that motivated the criminal to do the act and thus, gun has a vital role in the increment of the criminal activities. The said words are the main line for the anti-gun campaign. The debate that guns is used for conducting the crime and possession of guns are harmful based on the immediate function; therefore, it will be in the interest of the nation to outlaw the gun carrying and use. on the contrast, there are certain lawyers like Gary Kleck who is also the professor of criminology in Florida state university presented the statistics that citizens of U.S are protecting themselves 2.4 million times each year from the criminals by making use of their guns. The study was conducted in 1993 by the professor and more than 6000 families were involved in the survey study. The bureau of justice had the statics of 1.1 million criminal acts that were enforced by the use of gun in 1992, that revealed a relationship between the high use of gun power and the lowering of criminal activities. Under the light of legal gun control policy, practicing of filing of cases against the people became common, in them most of the cases were subjected to gun producers, who are not only producing but spreading the deadly weapon. While the lawsuit in between US and Emerson, a
Ethics of Gun Control The 2nd Amendment of the US constitution gives the right of owning and using arms for security purposes (Carter 24). The leaders who established the United States were of the belief that it is important for the citizens to carry the guns to protect the character and dignity…
The crowd inclded young children, teenagers and even a judge. Most just wanted to meet her and wish her well whereas others wanted to ask her questions. But one man, Jared Lee Lougher, had a different agenda on his mind. He arrived at the spot some time after 10 a.m carrying a semiautomatic 9mm glock.
In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported that total of 11,600 homicides were committed with firearms, claiming 68% of all homicides (Kleck, 2009: p. 1). In addition, about 100,000 to 150,000 people a year suffer non-fatal gunshot injuries (Kleck, 2009: p.
It has become an important part of Western art culture, and many artists’ research surrounds around it and, hence, it is an essential piece of art in modern times. Often termed as the universal icon of painting all over the world. It is present at the Louvre Museum at Paris.
The very concept of gun control had been in the public consciousness, in part, due to extensive media-frenzy surrounding the issue and the persistent references and linkages to violence and due to the piling evidence indicating increasing violence involving assault weapons.
In essence, the march leading to a demonstration basically called for gun control albeit it sugarcoated its approach by citing rhetorics that does sound like gun control (i.e. gun responsibility). It was a knee jerk response to the recent shooting in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut that left 20 children and six adults dead (Martinez and Scmidt).
The contending perspectives on the federal role in combating gun violence expanded the public debate over firearms regulations in recent years amid the furor over the series of assassinations, the racial riots,
This has been a also long-term problem as the constitution has supported private gun ownership. While a significant percentage of gun ownership by civilians is licensed, some people own guns illegally and others may acquire guns, temporarily, for ill objectives and
As a college student, I have sharpened my skills over the years. The choice of words is important as they may suggest different things in a statement, for instance, is it a fact or an opinion. Ethos, Pathos and Logos are my main
3 pages (750 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Gun Control or any other interesting philosophical topic., i don't mind for FREE!