Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Utilitarian vs. Deontological Perspectives: Human Cloning - Assignment Example

Only on StudentShare
Undergraduate
Author : branson58
Assignment
Philosophy
Pages 3 (753 words)

Summary

Yet, human beings have found that there may be potential benefits in creating human clones for a number of different reasons. The debate on this subject has been going on for decades and will likely continue to do so for some time…

Extract of sample
Utilitarian vs. Deontological Perspectives: Human Cloning

Yet, human beings have found that there may be potential benefits in creating human clones for a number of different reasons. The debate on this subject has been going on for decades and will likely continue to do so for some time. There are many different philosophical perspectives that one could apply to the issue of human cloning; it is the utilitarian and deontological perspective that offer two interesting comparative views. Human cloning has dominated science fiction for decades with scenarios revealing how the practice could go terribly wrong. Ethical debates have proposed many other unique issues with cloning; everything from the development of unforeseen genetic flaws, to the devaluation of life, to whether, or not, a cloned being will have rights and even a soul. However, it is the incredible potential of medical “miracles” that cloning might allow, in all its forms, which includes, ending infertility, eradicating genetic diseases, curing illnesses, replacing damaged organs, and last but not least, the ability to create life as they see fit, that continues to lure supporters.The philosophy cares less about how you accomplish something as long as the overall outcome leads to the greatest amount of overall good and happiness, while deontology considers less the outcomes and more about the intention behind doing it. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

In "Preventing a Brave New World" (pp. 317-329), Leon Kass concludes that reproductive and therapeutic cloning of human embryos
He points out that “revulsion” (Kass, 2001) is not the basis of his argument as he points out that “repugnance” (Kass, 2001) of the past is silently accepted in the present. He moreover observes that disgust is not something that is emotional and hence he is not being emotional when he criticizes the cloning of the human embryos but it is a deep thought into the matter makes him talk against the mechanism. He compares cloning with the incest relationships and other unethical activities like disfigurement of corpse or feeding on human flesh. Kass observes that as murder, rape or…
4 pages (1004 words)
Human Cloning and Its Consequences
Human cloning is also wrong for other reasons, one of them being that human clones might have their bodies harvested for body parts and/or human organs. Then they would be left for dead. We must remember that every person has a soul and a spirit. People should not be grown like oranges on a tree. There has been talk about, indeed, cloning people in order to harvest their organs for one’s clone. This is not only morally reprehensible, but also ethically wrong. How one could even consider raising a human, only to use the human’s body parts for another human—is almost inconceivable. It is…
3 pages (753 words)
Perspectives in Human
Values are a part of our lives (Heker, 1994). I can describe myself according to the following values which are: hard working, result oriented, punctual, impartial, open-minded, critical and rational. My list is inexhaustible but these are my strongest values. Before this semester, the most important values were being critical, hard working and being results-oriented. This however changed after I started this semester as I discovered new values which have proven to be of great benefit in determining my personality. Presently, I have endorsed the values of punctuality, impartiality,…
4 pages (1004 words)
Perspectives in Human
I must say, I didn’t understand many principles that my family stood for, but I always tried to reason them out with a positive presumption. I was brought up amongst these ideals, and I was on my way to becoming a helf-decent Paxton myself. But things have changed a lot since my first semester in College. Growing up in the Paxton family, the first thing I was taught was to sing the glory of god and his creations. Not a day passed without my mother reading out a verse from the Bible before I went to bed. Sometimes, these verses would manifest themselves into biblical dreams. The holidays…
4 pages (1004 words)
Human Cloning: Right or Wrong?
This was done through nuclear substitution, a method besides cell mass division or “embryo splitting” which is the only method applied on humans. Humans have been attempted to have been cloned for the purpose of reproduction or experimental reasons. However this is considered an unworthy means to bring more humans to life because those in favor of human cloning fail to respect the early stage of human growth which directly questions human dignity. In a situation where a person is informed that he is cloned he will instantly undergo a phase of shock after which he will question what exactly…
3 pages (753 words)
Human nature vs. Human condition
But it needs to be noted here that everything that relates to us is inbuilt. Some features that build up our personality are depending on our past rather than having a scientific background. Things that build up the human condition are marriages, deaths, terrorism, physical activities like sports etc. which are not applicable to any scientific reasoning need to be studied in a more humanly manner. "Thinking about humans and the rest of nature has focused on shared biological properties and environmental attitudes." (Levin, 9) The reason why people confuse these very different branches of…
5 pages (1255 words)
Bentham’s utilitarian principle
Based on these theories, societies, along with its member, behaves according to what they thought is applicable and appropriate. Happiness and pleasure against sorrow and pain controls every individual, thus behave according to the amount these opposing nature with the risk of the consequences that their action entails. This utilitarianism principle is what is thought to have governed the world as proposed by Jeremy Bentham. At present, Bentham’s (1781) utilitarian principle is considered as the most appropriate and the most modern among other ethical principles in the society. He regards…
4 pages (1004 words)