You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Utilitarian vs. Deontological Perspectives: Human Cloning
Pages 3 (753 words)
Yet, human beings have found that there may be potential benefits in creating human clones for a number of different reasons. The debate on this subject has been going on for decades and will likely continue to do so for some time.
Yet, human beings have found that there may be potential benefits in creating human clones for a number of different reasons. The debate on this subject has been going on for decades and will likely continue to do so for some time. There are many different philosophical perspectives that one could apply to the issue of human cloning; it is the utilitarian and deontological perspective that offer two interesting comparative views. Human cloning has dominated science fiction for decades with scenarios revealing how the practice could go terribly wrong. Ethical debates have proposed many other unique issues with cloning; everything from the development of unforeseen genetic flaws, to the devaluation of life, to whether, or not, a cloned being will have rights and even a soul. However, it is the incredible potential of medical “miracles” that cloning might allow, in all its forms, which includes, ending infertility, eradicating genetic diseases, curing illnesses, replacing damaged organs, and last but not least, the ability to create life as they see fit, that continues to lure supporters.The philosophy cares less about how you accomplish something as long as the overall outcome leads to the greatest amount of overall good and happiness, while deontology considers less the outcomes and more about the intention behind doing it. ...
Not exactly what you need?