The Cosmological Argument Abstract The cosmological argument aims at proving God’s existence from the very fact that the Universe (cosmos) must have began from somewhere. The paper therefore seeks to critically evaluate and review the soundness (sound argument: An argument that is valid and has all true premises) of the cosmological argument as brought forth by St Thomas Aquinas and other Philosophers and give reasons for its support (Alan Hausman, Howard Kahane, Paul Tidman, 16)…
The cosmological argument is a posteriori argument that aims at proving the existence of God from the basis of our own existence. It purports to establish the existence of a being and its possession of the attributes- omnipotence, omniscience, goodness etc. - commonly associated with theistic concept of God (Rowe, M. William, 5). There are three forms of the cosmological argument: the Thomist, Leibnizian and Kalam arguments. The argument has got two distinct parts; the first part of the argument tries to establish the existence of a superior being, the unmoved mover or rather the prime mover as Aristotle tells us. The second part of the argument on the other hand, moves to name the self existent being as God. The argument as put forth by St. Thomas Aquinas (13th C) and later a new version by Philosophers of 18th C moves from the known to unknown. In other words, it begins from what we see by our own senses to a reality that is beyond our experiences. The cosmological argument however, has left so many loopholes that are yet to be answered. One of the arguments by St. Thomas is the argument from motion; that some things in this world are seen to be in motion. That which moves must have the potential of changing to actuality. But nothing can reduce itself from potentiality to actuality, except by something already in a state of actuality. Therefore, not all beings are merely possible, but there must exist something the existence of which is necessary (St. Thomas, Summa Theologica, Q. 2, 3rd Article, “5 ways” pp 5 and 6). A being that is purely in the actual state is responsible for the motion, is responsible for bringing into being and out of existence, is responsible for the beginning of the Universe. Consider the Kalam argument by Moreland (178): 1. The Universe had a beginning 2. The beginning of the Universe was caused 3. The cause for the beginning of the universe was personal The Kalam argument is in fact very clear that the Universe had a beginning in time and everything that has a beginning in time has a cause. Put it in this way that everything with a beginning in time stands in need of explanation and the only explanation for the existence of the Universe must be, as it suggests, the Universe was created by God. Indeed we are talking of a beginning or an end; that the Universe began from somewhere. The ever expanding Universe must have come from somewhere hence we talk of a beginning. Even the Big Bang theory fails to tell us the origin of the explosive density mass. Because if they tell us, it could imply again that the Universe must have been brought into being by a superior being that does not need any other being for its own existence. Again, if we infer that the uncaused cause, the necessary being requires another necessary being for it to exist, it will be absurd because in the first place infinitude here does not apply; again a necessary being does not require any other being for it to exist and therefore the necessary being must be one and that is God. Can one imagine therefore, of a time when there was nothing at all? This is to tell us that if nothing was in existence, even now we would have nothing existing. But a gain can nothing produce nothing? Once more, since we are, it means ...
Cite this document
(“Philosophy/Theology/Logic: logical acumen and thinking Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/80887-philosophy-theology-logic-logical-acumen-and
(Philosophy/Theology/Logic: Logical Acumen and Thinking Essay)
“Philosophy/Theology/Logic: Logical Acumen and Thinking Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/80887-philosophy-theology-logic-logical-acumen-and.
(You can’t take an incidental reference to the weather as your starting point.) The claim, and any other material from any resource, must be used in light of the author’s own understanding. (You can’t twist the author’s words or take things out of context.) You must announce your thesis as the final sentence of the first paragraph of your paper.
From simple facts and observations, complex ideas are then formed through various cognitive processes such as simplification and abstraction. This process is called empiricism. Therefore, Plato’s claim that the mind is born with knowledge is false. Locke furthered that information is gained through a person’s faculties.
Within the framework of the theory he postulated that critical thinking was important in problem solving. In fact, he perceived problems to be having geometrical representations. During Hitler’s reign he moved to New York where he later died. Introduction Gestalt theory or, rather, the dynamic theory of thinking was the result of actual studies in logic, psychology, and epistemology.
His book, Figuring the Sacred is one such book and is a wonderful collection of twenty-one essays.
In an essay titled Evil, a Challenge to Philosophy and Theology (19852) which is a part of this book Ricoeur has discussed manifold explanations of evil and how it can be defined by philosophy.
According to the essay findings, to be able to think clearly and rationally implies the presence of critical thinking in an individual. From the essay "Critical Thinking Philosophy" it is clear that the ability to apply independent logic and rationale behind any idea is indicative of critical thinking.
) of the cosmological argument as brought forth by St Thomas Aquinas and other Philosophers and give reasons for its support (Alan Hausman, Howard Kahane, Paul Tidman, 16). In this regard, the paper will base itself on the two cosmological arguments (Thomistic and the Kalam
Similarly, Hindu religious faith revolves around karma and concept of rebirth.
While philosophers start with discussing about faith, they do not blindly believe in everything. Hence, philosophy applies
However, when a person is in danger and has no way to escape a perpetrator but to kill him/her, instinct and critical thinking may suggest that ethics must be disregarded. In addition, with the mixture of races and philosophies