Fourth, the judgments of taste that are considered less peculiar are analyzed. Finally, the paper illustrates on the more peculiar judgments of taste in regard to Kent’s critique.
The first peculiarity in judging taste that Kant postulates in his “Critique of the Power of Judgment” is satisfaction. According to Kant, an individual judges the taste of an object in line to the level of satisfaction that is achieved in the use of the object (Kant 118). This satisfaction is said to reside in the beauty of the object. The satisfaction that is achieved in the use of an object is normally accompanied with an individual’s assent. In this sense, it is assumed that the level of satisfaction which is achieved is objective. Kant illustrates that the satisfaction which is achieved through an object varies from one individual to another. This means that what is considered to be satisfying by one person may be unsatisfactory to another. It is due to the above claim that Kant says that an objective approach in the used of an object is valid in determining the level of satisfaction which is achieved by the user or consumer of the object. This implies that when an object is being consumed, the objective of the consumer in the use of the object plays a role in defining if it is satisfactory or not. 2. An illustration of the First Peculiarity The first example that will illustrate first peculiarity is the satisfaction which is achieved by individuals in the consumption of various food products such as chocolate. If an individual says that the test of chocolate is nice, it should not be assumed that it will satisfy everyone in equal measure. Kant demonstrates this illustration by saying that the pleasantness of an object such is not likely to satisfy all people equally (Kant 119). A second illustration on satisfaction is the perception of people on the beauty and satisfying feeling of a certain scene in nature. A garden for example could appeal to different people differently which reveals that the satisfaction which is achieved on visual contact to specific scenes or objects is influenced by both internal and external influences. Finally, it is illustrative that if an individual is satisfied by a certain smell by considering it pleasant, the same smell may give another person a headache and therefore fail to achieve a satisfying feeling. According to these claims therefore, the beauty of an object is just one of its properties and the manner in which it is received and experienced by different people varies in accordance to the perception which emanates from their senses. Kent argues that the satisfaction that is achieved by the smell of an object is not accommodative of the different tastes among different people (Kent 118). This argument can be illustrated by the following sentiments. Firstly, the experiences of people vary which influences the manner in which they perceive object. Secondly, different individuals have varying thresholds upon which they would be satisfied by a given object. Finally, individuals get satisfied by an object based on other factors such as the person presenting it to them or the circumstances within which the object is received. 3. The First Peculiarity and Beauty Satisfaction is explained by Kant in proportionality with beauty. First example: Individuals often judge others and objects and get satisfied with what they offer it in regard to the level at which they consider them to be beautiful. This proposition is attributed to the following facts. First, the mode or approach that individuals employ in apprehending