StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Aristotle & Hume - Term Paper Example

Nobody downloaded yet
Passion is a feeling which has no boundaries, if aroused naturally and authentically in an individual. Hume understands the concepts and elements of life as he is a deep thinker and has contemplated on life and human psychology in various ways. Here the intention is to comprehend the statement of Hume and interpret it with one of the greatest Greek philosophers the world has seen, Aristotle. The view of Aristotle is distinctive and unique and can be contradictory or resembling to that of Hume. The attempt here is to argumentatively interpret the statement by Hume and convey how Aristotle would converse regarding this issue. Passion being a natural feeling cannot be influenced or affected by other qualities or personality traits of human being. People can analyze the feeling and reciprocate on it in varied ways, but it really depends on the philosophical perspective and reasoning ability of a philosopher. Here the perspective and argumentative stand of Hume and Aristotle would bring about more of depth to the thinking ability and philosophical values of both. Arguments Passion is natural and contradictory to reasoning Aristotle, as an intellectual thinker and philosopher, connects virtue to feelings. Passion is an aggressive and intense feeling of human being. Aristotle was of the opinion that with intellectual thinking intellectual virtues like wisdom, reasoning and intellectual skills are connected; on the other hand, moralistic virtues are related to one of the component of soul where feelings reside. If a person holds a pure soul, then he would be morally ideal and realistically passionate. Passion is attached to soul; it is a feeling arising from the inner most depth of a human soul and heart. A person who possesses high intelligence needs not necessarily have a passionate soul or heart. According to Morgan, “[f]or when the beings are of different kinds, the parts of the soul naturally suited are of different kinds, since the parts possess knowledge by being somehow similar appropriate” (Morgan 307). It is normally observed that a person with intelligence and a high reasoning ability focuses more on analytical facts and gives importance to brain faculty rather than desire. Here we can understand that Hume’s ideology and Aristotle’s perspective match in a positive manner. Aristotle would totally agree with Hume and would proclaim that passion in no way can be combatted by reasoning. Reasoning is a quality of physical body whereas passion is both spiritual and physical and can surpass reason in all manners. Aristotle would postulate the fact that passion, as a strong feeling, could change a man’s thinking and reasoning ability to a great extent. Aristotle would further suggest that a man who is passionately evoked cannot be tethered by reasoning or intelligence as he is completely surrendered to the soul. A soul is the ultimate powerhouse of a human being, and when enslaved to soul, no intelligence can rule the mental status of a person. Reason is an egoistic value and passion a natural feeling Aristotle, being a soul lover, would comment to Hume that soul is the universal energy, and nothing in the world which is related to ego can fight with it. Passion is the essence of a soul, and a man, being a soul enriched being, can be overwhelmingly overtaken by passion. Reasoning is a component of soul, but it is not a moralistic virtue even though it is a virtue. Aristotle would continue that all virtues are not idealistic, and ...Show more


Name Subject Instructor Date Philosophy - Aristotle & Hume Hume argues that reason cannot combat a passion. How do you think Aristotle would respond? How would you continue this conversation? Introduction Hume is a philosopher who interpreted passion and reason in a distinctive manner than other philosophers…
Author : catherineratke
Aristotle & Hume essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the term paper on your topic
"Aristotle & Hume"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Aristotle & Boethius
This is part of his wider discourse on what is morally virtuous, wherein he famously explained how a person’s moral quality is characterized by how he responds to pleasure and pain. This is crucial for Aristotelian readers because this effectively enables them to discriminate characters better simply by examining his or her choices instead of the actions.
6 pages (1500 words) Term Paper
Hobbes and Hume: Covenant
Some of the interlocking concepts that require definition include law, right, liberty, and obligation. Unless, these concepts are clearly distinct from each other, aspect of “covenant” as prompted by Hobbes cannot be clearly analyzed. Nonetheless, it would be as well vital to distinguish the general definition of these concepts from the specific definitions of the law of nature and the right of nature.
6 pages (1500 words) Term Paper
Aristotle was a brilliant student of Plato though he opposed some of the ideas of Plato later in his teachings. After the death of Plato, he left Athens and spent time travelling and learning new areas of science and thoughts. When he returned to Macedonia in 338, he became the tutor of Alexander the great.
5 pages (1250 words) Term Paper
Comparing the differences of purpose of government according to Philosophers. (Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, and Locke)
Purpose of Government according to Philosophers. The purpose for which governments should exist has been a preoccupation of philosophers from the classical period to the modern societies. While Plato and Aristotle represent classical philosophers, Hobbes and Locke are a part of what is seen as modern philosophers.
5 pages (1250 words) Term Paper
During his lifetime as a philosopher he made contributions to the fields of logic, metaphysics, mathematics, biology, botany, ethics, politics, agriculture, ethics, politics, agriculture, dance, and theater (Iep). Aristotle was a very talented writer. Altogether he wrote more
4 pages (1000 words) Term Paper
Similarly automation an advancing concept in industries developed with the help and assistance of mathematical logical principles. Since microcontrollers are programmed through these
10 pages (2500 words) Term Paper
Aristotle & Hume
He argues that passion as a strong human feeling arises out of lustful nature in person. Passion is a feeling whinchats no boundaries, if aroused naturally and authentically in an individual. Hume understands the concepts and elements of life, as he is a deep thinker and has
6 pages (1500 words) Term Paper
Friendship and Aristotle
sanction from the inner world of an individual, and finally it helps to maintain the balanced mental attitude whether the outcome is adverse or favorable. A friend does anything and everything for his friend. According to Aristotle, friendship is the finest and significant
5 pages (1250 words) Term Paper
Exam 1
Justice based on moral principles enhances fairness among all involved parties. The definition can be manipulated to fit various parties’ opinions. Consequently, philosophers define justice as a component of both moral virtue and
5 pages (1250 words) Term Paper
Causality by Hume and Kant
Kant argues that nothing has ever occurred that could have been more impactful to its fate (Ariew & Watkins, 2009, 813). As Kant argued in the prolegomena, the remedy to the solution of Hume’s dilemma is to acknowledge that objects of experience are perspectives, and not objects in themselves.
3 pages (750 words) Term Paper
Hire a pro to write
a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Aristotle & Hume for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
  • About StudentShare

  • Testimonials

  • FAQ

  • Blog

  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays

  • The Newest Essay Topics
Join us:
Contact Us