Reasons Why Same Sex Adoption is Morally Wrong The same-sex movement of the 21st century would like the traditional public to consider something that they call “the new normal”, a family unit composed of a same sex couple and their adopted child. They call themselves the new normal because they insist upon redefining the true and traditional definition and description of what makes up a traditional, normal family unit…
I shall present both sides of the issue using information from various credible sources, including my opinion on the matter as well towards the end of this paper. In order to understand the morally and socially acceptable reasons against same sex adoptions, I wish to first present the arguments that are normally presented by same sex couples in support of their cause. These are arguments that, although seemingly acceptable, places the child in question in the center of a psychologically traumatic experience that could carry life long consequences for the child if not dealt with in a proper manner. The first argument that is often presented in support of same sex adoption is that the traditional family unit as we know it is based upon a shaky foundation that often times end up in divorce and a traumatic existence for the child. It is their belief that there is no difference in raising a child in the same sex household because they can provide a more stable household for the child based upon a mutual love and respect for the family unit that seems to now be sorely lacking among the traditional couples (“Pros and Cons of Gay Adoption”). Same sex couples claim that the high rate of divorce among the heterosexual couples makes them a bad example for the children who are traumatized by what could often times turn out to be messy divorces that put the child in the middle of an ugly custody battle. Their second argument is that advances in medical science have allowed them to conceive children artificially. Therefore, it is their right to have children born of their own flesh and blood, even if they were the result of a surrogate mother or the sperm of a man unknown to the child's mothers. What is important is that the child is a living part of their own DNA strain. Therefore, not allowing them to adopt a child who badly needs the love and care of strangers willing to give him or her a better life would be robbing the child of the right to live with all the good chances that the “modern family” can afford him (“Pros and Cons of Gay Adoption”). After all, there is one thing of the utmost importance in any adoption proceeding and that is what will be in the best interests of the child. They believe, that they can best represent that interest as the normal families seem to have a hard time providing such for their children and adopted children. In accordance with this belief, the International Adoption Database has even mentioned that the sexual orientation of a parent should not be considered when setting up a child for adoption. The organization believes that; “Good parenting is not influenced by sexual orientation. Rather, it is influenced most profoundly by a parent's ability to create a loving and nurturing home -- an ability that does not depend on whether a parent is gay or straight.” (Marquardt, Maddie “Who Sets Standards of a Suitable Parent?”). They also argue that preventing them from adopting children can be taken as an act of sexual discrimination, an act which is prohibited under the laws of the United States. They also make important note of the fact that there is a shortage of qualified adoptive heterosexual parents these days. ...
Cite this document
(“Convincing that the same sex adoption morally wrong Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/philosophy/84225-convincing-that-the-same-sex-adoption-morally
(Convincing That the Same Sex Adoption Morally Wrong Essay)
“Convincing That the Same Sex Adoption Morally Wrong Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/philosophy/84225-convincing-that-the-same-sex-adoption-morally.
The idea of same sex marriage affects wide areas such as domestic affairs, employee benefits, and government allowance and inheritance rights. Lately, the argument of same sex marriage has grown up to a global issue which does not have an amicable solution.
In the US, gays and lesbians are yet to be accepted by people as healthy part of the society. Homosexuals experience rejection and negative attitude from people around them (Pastorino and Doyle-Portillo 459). Hence, they are not able to participate openly in many of the social programs and institutions.
However, those who have a homosexual orientation experience a wide range of obstacles and dilemmas when it comes to participating in social institutions such as marriage, family, and parenting. In the United States today, gays and lesbians are still to be accepted by a majority of the people as a functional part of society.
These advancements have led to various options in gaming, especially in mode, type, and style of playing. Undoubtedly, issues on the playing of these games, especially the violent ones have been brought forward. While some users declare that these violent computer games are not morally wrong, others insist that they encourage violent and immoral behaviour among gamers.
We have to accept the reality that the modern family is no longer clearly defined in the 21st century. Same sex couples, regardless of whether they are legally bestowed the right to marry or not will want to have children and, they will find a way to do that.
Still, the modern world is gradually accepting same-sex marriages because the same is related to personal interest and sexual orientation. Thesis statement: The issues related to same sex marriage prove that the same is accepted as a deviation in sexual interest and individual difference by liberal thinkers and activists, religious people and moralists hesitate to accept the same, but impartial evaluation proves that individuals must be allowed to take independent decisions on sexual interest and marriage.
Also known in other significant terms such as gay marriage, gender-neutral marriage, or equal marriage, same-sex marriage has become one of the most researched topics and several articles have been written on the various issues concerning the issue. In one such significant articles on the topic, Charlene Gomes's "The Need for Full Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage' advocates that "the time has come to expand marriage to include same-sex couples.
Marriages are made in Heaven, they say. Rightly so, but the marriages between man and woman. No religion in the world supports marriage within the same sex. Same sex marriages or gay marriages became a topic of controversy in the late 1990s or early 2000s. History does show a record of same sex desire or unions between men, usually of varying ages.
The range of the number of hours watching television by respondents is 24 hours per day with minimum being 0 hours per day and maximum being 24 hours per day (may be an error in data!). Watching television less than 3 hours per