It also states that there is nothing as morally right or morally wrong. We cannot judge the views of other people from a different culture. Our ethics and morals evolve with the passage of time. The evolution in ethics occurs due to interaction with different people of different virtues and diverse cultures. Some people do think that morals and ethics should not be discussed with each other as it may cause rupture in their relation and people must live on the principle of Live an Let live others formula. But this principle is not right. It is perilous and also gutless. It is dangerous as it prevents us from pointing out the morally and ethically wrongs of the civilization. It is also cowardly as it denies our responsibility to make the world better place to survive for everyone. A different principle holds different views about the Ethical Relativism. The three major principles are: 1. Cultural Relativism: Cultural Relativism point of view is that there are no universally valid moral values, and moral principles are related to the culture of the people in which they live. Anything is right for you if your culture allows it to be. The society is the authority which could differentiate between right or wrong. If the majority of the culturists decide something to be wrong, you will have to admit it as wrong. In the early ages, when people had to live in societies secluded to each other it would had been reasonable to think that the traditions and practices of one’s own culture are right. But now, in this modern age where world is globalized, it is not reasonable to think that own culture is the only right way. Many practices which would be right long time age are falsified in the modern world. The early Greeks felt proud of stealing, but in this era we consider it as wrong. Some villages in Uganda think that they have no responsibility over their children but it is condemned in our modernized world. In the modern world also Dos in one culture are DONTs in other cultures. Like eating beef is DO in USA but DON’T in India. Alcohol and gambling is DO in USA but don’t in Muslims countries. Killing newborns or “Satti” is DO in India but DON’T in USA and European countries. 2. Ethical Subjectivism: The Ethical Subjectivism states that there are no universal moral values and ethics and the truth of moral principle changes from individual to individual. According to this theory, the right or wrong depends upon you. It is up to you to decide as to what is right and what is wrong. You are having sovereignty over your life, as to how you have to live your life nobody can dictate you. If two people are married to each other and both want to follow contradictory religion, Subjective relativism allows them to do so. They are free to choose which they think is right for them. If one person thinks that he should be catholic as the teachings are right then he can follow Christianity and vice versa. Subjective Ethical Relativism’s main emphasis is on the tolerance. All opinions about way of living life, moral and ethical values are considered equal and tolerance is promoted as others are equally right. Lot of distress, Genocides, protest, racism is all due to intolerance and considers other people as wrong. Ethical Relativism does not tell about the absoluteness of right or wrong and same is with cultural Relativism. 3. Divine Command: According to this
Name: Course: Professor: Date: Ethical Relativism The subject of ethical relativism is heard, if not understood completely, by most of the people today. The importance of the idea of ethical relativism lies in its definition and truth of the underlying principle…
General ethics are intrinsic part of human interactions that are guided by individual values and principles. In the broader context of business, the ethical considerations are deemed complex as people have diverse perspectives on issues. This is critical aspect which could lead to conflict of interest, both within the organization and the external environment within which it operates.
The author states that from the Christian philosophical perspective, self interest aspect is viewed as self love or duty to self or saving one’s soul or other aspects but this does not necessarily mean that people should refuse to share with others. Sharing is one way of fulfilling self interest since it can help in saving other people.
Apart from his works being displayed in most major museums of great importance around the world, anyone belonging to the elite & rich would unarguably love to have an original collected.
All the above articles have been obtained from the
In Those Winter Sundays by Robert Hayden, we see an adult speaker who depicts the ways in which his father expresses love and concern towards him based on the actions he engaged in. Both of these poems To His Coy Mistress and Those Winter Sundays contain common elements that
ugh investigation the law society came to the conclusion that the appellant had not deposited all the monies that he had received for the transfer into his trust account and the deposited monies was not done in a prompt manner, the appellant records of accounts did not reflect
The United States Constitution and the Australian Constitution have some similarities and differences. This paper will compare and contrast the United States and Australian Constitution. In the comparison, the factor to be considered is the limitation
6 pages (1500 words)Essay
Get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Didn't find an essay?
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org