Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Interpretation & evaluation of one theory belonging to H.L.A. Hart in book 'Concept of Law' - Term Paper Example

Only on StudentShare
College
Author : jarrod75
Term Paper
Philosophy
Pages 7 (1757 words)

Summary

Name Institution Date A theory from H.L.A. Hart’s book, The concept of law Introduction The mention of Anglo-American legal philosophy insinuates a ring of one name, that of Herbert Adolphus Hart (H. L. A. Hart). This is with regards to the contribution he placed in corridors of legal philosophy…

Extract of sample
Interpretation & evaluation of one theory belonging to H.L.A. Hart in book 'Concept of Law'

However, his perception on positivism may be defined as the pinnacle of his argument. The central perception that makes this topic outstanding in the ears of the audience is the compelling attitude which it triggers from both convictions. Harts seems to perceive a differing conviction on legal positivism as compared to Ronald Dworkin. The focus of this essay will be narrowed on evaluating the perception embraced by H. L. A. Hart, and subsequently evaluating its contribution to contemporary law. Hart presents a valid argument over the challenges anticipated in the dispensation of the law, however, he does not offer an acceptable path towards the establishment of the proposed solutions to the problem. Interpretation The topic of legal positivism has been re-evaluated accordingly following the erupt of various thinkers airing a varying opinion on the subject. The central argument has been the interrelation shared by the theory and other models of the law, especially on the aspect of summation (Coleman 64). Hart argument is distributed in phases, where there exists the primary phase and the secondary phase of execution. The central argument aired by H. L. A. Hart is that the primary rules implicate or impose the observation of the law. This understanding is best exemplified via criminal law, where the law is exercised directly against the injustices and atrocities committed. H. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Hart-Devlin Debate
They often defined right or wrong in the society, and people often stand to those principles. The law is not enacted when one is not moral or does not act in a certain moral way. The reparations of not being moral are often individual. Morality and laws often contradict in their formation and implementation. Moralities develop after a while, are not easy to alter, and are often a mindset that people have. Laws on the other hand, are easily amended and do not require a lot of time. The well-known debate between hart and Devlin addressed the relationship between law and principles. The debate…
9 pages (2259 words)
Hart-Devlin Debate
However, the law is not against the private lives of people and the activities they undertake in private. Therefore, a law cannot be imposed that interferes with the private lives of people. The report by the committee sparked a reaction from Patrick Devlin. Devlin in his discussion on “the enforcement of morals” argued that criminal law is not only meant to protect individuals but the entire society. Therefore, if people are engaged in activities that are against the society norms should be criminated. He further argued that criminal law should not only protect criminal activities that…
10 pages (2510 words)
Evaluation
Being an artist also takes the skill to evaluate one’s self in relationship to the creative moment, to be able to channel that something from deep inside into the piece so that the work is something more than just ‘pretty’. In deciding to be an artist, the pathway towards artistic achievement is far beyond the imaginings of the experience, even for the artist. Technique evolves through the experience of working with a medium. One learns through the educational venue, through working with materials, and through exploring with the raw substances that will go into creating the piece of…
4 pages (1004 words)
Modern Ethical Theory or Pragmatism ( choose one)
These theories have in turn been relied upon heavily in determining the parameters of ethical and moral conduct across different cultures and under different circumstances. These theories draw from the ideas of great moral philosophers like John Stuart Mill, Immanuel Kant, David Hume among others. Hume vs Kant vs Mill: Their different views on ethics and morality. By giving their views, all moral philosophers aim at describing the best standard of moral and ethical conduct. However, there normally arises a dilemma on which ethical theory should be applied because of the variations in how…
4 pages (1004 words)
Government (social contract theory and redistribution of wealth). Chose one of them
I am more inclined to believe that man by default is good and influenced by his or her environment where he can be better or slide into misery, as Hobbes argues. Misery and chaos are not the natural conditions of man but, rather, the blank state or tabulasa rasa subject to the condition and influence of the society, environment and government. Hobbes’ argument about the basis of government is also flawed, as per the statement that government is formed by its citizens’ giving up some of its destructive rights to have a government. While it may be partially correct that people must cede or…
4 pages (1004 words)
Marxist Theory Book Report/Review
An understanding of Marxism consequently provides the proletariat theoretically for the enormous historic task of the Socialist transformation of Society.…
4 pages (1004 words)