In the case of his friend for instance, who wanted the money to ‘commit sin’ with a call girl, he denied him on moral grounds. He argued that by doing that, he would be hurting the wife of this co-worker. However, his morality position can be questioned where he provides his boss with money to purchase a gift. This present was supposed to be given to a woman that the boss was having an affair with, though he was married. Though the individual in question knew about this, he went ahead and paid for the gift for his boss. The two similar scenarios have elicited two contrasting responses. This therefore begs the question of where he stands as far as morality is concerned. The lack of consistence despite the situation is enough to support the fact that most people would appear moral only when they gain more pleasure in the event. However, if there is any loss perceived, one would rather compromise to safe their status quo. My point of view and premises for that position Consistency in terms of how one responds to issues of morality within the society is imperative. This is especially on how one conducts him/herself towards the colleagues in the working environment. For one to be defined as morally upright, it would be necessary for them to appear predictable in all situations, in terms of their position on various social issues. Fear of losing certain favors because of one’s action or position should not arise. In the case of the of the individual in question, the fact that he agreed to do his boss a favor opens a door to further compromises in future. Through one would understand his reason for taking that compromising act, he failed to take initiative of rejecting. For instance, he did not offer his stand on the issue of unfaithfulness on the part of his boss. The fact that he assisted him in paying for the gift could be explained as ‘supporting such an act.’ Secondly, one would also say that his moral position is not grounded strongly. He is swayed by circumstances which should not be the case provided one does what they think is right. For instance, why did he not fear losing friendship by not lending money to his friend? Secondly, why did he not choose to reciprocate the same act to his boss? The whole issue of morality lacks meaning if how one behaves is determined by pain and pleasure one may incur. One would be in a position to draw a line and say ‘this is right’ and ‘this is wrong’ despite the repercussions. The notion that he would be discharged of his duty by denying the favor to his boss is just a perception that is not based on reality. For instance, there are laws which protect employees from any unfair treatment. One can seek redress if they feel they are being harassed by their seniors. According to my position therefore, morality should have a specific definition and remain consistent in all scenarios regardless of the consequences. Support by other philosopher such as John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham, John F. Cosby and Veatch. John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham seem to share similar sentiments as far as issues of morality are concerned. They raise two important social phenomena of pain and pleasure as the main determinants of how individuals behave in certain circumstances (Bentham 58). They indicate that what manners are the final result and not the means taken. Both of them agree on matters of personal happiness as what is imperative in deciding moral
Institution Date Analysis From the analysis of the moral question stated, the author seems to be applying double standards when it comes to deciding how to behave in certain situations. His response to various moral issues seems to be based on what he gains from his actions…
Switzerland is a beautiful place with equally beautiful people living in the country. A club by the name Grasshopper Zurich upon watching a couple of the videos, where the researcher payed football decided to give him a trail, so that he flew for the first time to Europe in Switzerland for that matter.
I call this a coincidence because I found the university’s pamphlet lying in our library and after going through it I realized it was an excellent opportunity for me to apply here.
The very fact that this university is more than a century old
This involves weighing the options available and the opportunities they offer. In other words, one should weigh the benefits and costs of each over the other and creating the best possible benefiting situation. I
2). Over the subsequent century, the vigilante has focused much attention on violence, lawlessness and retributive justice. He goes further to scrutinize the motivation behind their actions. In order to go about this task, we
In other words, customers exhibit diverse and dynamic behavior over time. In this respect, successful business capturing of customers could take a retention or acquisition strategy (Peppers and Martha 6).
The strategy employed
t of the mainstream feminists allege that if females were treated and socialized in the same manner as males and were to conduct similar roles, their rates of criminal offences would be the same. In that case, it is imperative to understand the reason why women commit crimes in
Besides giving me access to financial resources, pursuing college education will give me time to establish connections and networks with people that may come to help me later on in the future in terms of getting a job or
3 pages (750 words)Personal Statement
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com