Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Can bankers appeal to psychological egoism to defend their large bonuses? (Note: this is a question about psychological egoism, - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Pages 6 (1506 words)


Psychological Egoism and Large Bonuses for Bankers Name: University: Course: Tutor: Date: Introduction Psychological egoism is a term used to refer to claim that people always act in their own self interest. This claim argues that people act in their self interest even when they engage in altruistic acts…

Extract of sample
Can bankers appeal to psychological egoism to defend their large bonuses? (Note: this is a question about psychological egoism,

In this regard, unlike ethical egoism, psychological egoism is descriptive of how issues are rather than what things are supposed to be. Rationale for Psychological Egoism and Large Bonuses for Bankers According to LaFave (2011) if the psychological egoism is true, then ethics are in trouble. However, this view has received a varied number of views with regard how valid it is. An area where the psychological egoism has been seen to operate is in business especially with regard to what is today called corporate social responsibility. Many professionals argue that corporate social responsibility is hypocritical as it is a way to increase market for the firm rather than being guided a true need to help the society. The banking industry especially in advanced economies such as the US has received the most criticism with bankers being seen as devils agents who only look to advance their interests while the customers and the general public suffer. Bankers have since been accused of amassing their wealth by giving themselves hefty bonuses even in times when the business is not doing exceptionally well. In other places like the UK, the government tried to limit the amount the banker can get annually (Desai, 2011). ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Epicurus and Hobbes Philosophies: Advocating Moral Egoism?
Thomas Hobbes believed that the best way to live life is through an absolute sovereignty in the form of a government (“Thomas Hobbes”). Having different beliefs on methods of how life must be lived, both of them thought that these methods serve the self-interest of individuals. Their philosophies therefore summarize that of a moral egoist which states that it is ethical to do actions that serve an individual’s self-interest or the common interest of a group. It is the objective of this paper to justify the lumping of these two thinkers as moral egoists in accordance to their common…
3 pages (753 words)
Two Opposing Perspectives on Egoism of Nietsche and Kierkegaard
Nietzsche, on the other hand, might not have explicitly mentioned the atheistic foundation of his argument in his statement in Gay Science No. 304 but it is clear that he insisted that man should not be controlled by any rule or principle that restrains him from doing what he wants. Apparently, Nietzsche and Kierkegaard also differed in their views when it comes to their treatment of the ego or the individual. For Nietzsche, the individual is supreme and it is only by being so that he frees himself from the clutches of any entity that could hinder his struggle to achieve happiness. Rules that…
6 pages (1506 words)
Homosexuality. Theory of Ethical Egoism and Theory of Cultural Relativism.
This is a form of consequentialism. As the term suggests, the reaction of a moral agent is the result of the consequences around him. To fight a particular situation requires high level decision making. The theory of ethical egoism relates honesty with relationships. The reaction of the ethical egoists may be in their individual self-interest but there is no harmful effect of this reaction on the opponents (Louis P. Pojman, 2008). Theory of Cultural Relativism Defining the theory in a to-the-point way identifies that cultural relativism means to understand different cultures in complete detail…
3 pages (753 words)
Social Contraction vs. Ethical Egoism
This theory also holds that it is alright to be this way; it is rational. However, in the real world, if everybody blindly followed their hearts desires then there would be chaos. To this situation, this theory calls for application of rationality from a different angle. This angle prescribes that people should cooperate with one another and cut down on the purely self serving pursuits. This aspect defines the social contract nature of this theory (Shafer-Landau 188). People will not live life to the fullest, but they will avoid a worse fate of being in constant upheaval with society. What…
6 pages (1506 words)
How Dretske responds to Chisholm's claim that intentionality cannot be naturalized
Chisholm argued that intentionality cannot be naturalized because of the numerous influencing factors that surround us. According to Locke Chisholm argued that for every decision we make there must be a factor that influences or alters a person’s needs or will. He further argued that every decision we make is based on the fact that we must take the path to be comfortable. According to Chisholm factors affecting a person’s intent may also be psychological. This also denies the possibility that intentionality can be natural. To naturalize intentionality Chisholm argued that there must be…
6 pages (1506 words)
Do all arguements about abortion come down to the question of what is the moral status of a fetus? Explain.
It is obviously an important decision since it concerns the life of a human being. The life in question includes that of the mother carrying the child as well as the fetus itself. Theories of abortion follow most arguments concerning faith and different situations that a pregnant woman is in. in the situation of endangered life, even morality ought to reason with abortion as the right thing to do. Morality thus, ought to help pregnant persons who are in harsh situations obtain help. In the event of an ectopic pregnancy for example, the lives of both the mother and her child face possibilities…
"Appeal to Flattery" Fallacy
Appeal to flattery is a fallacy or a misleading idea which has been frenetically researched through the lens of philosophy and psychology.Fallacy itself is widely known as a poorly constructed argument that employs no reasoning but misleading ideas which are expressed to further one’s interests.When there is no concrete reason for advancing one’s interests, a variety of fallacies can be used to achieve the desired objectives.Appeal to flattery is an intentional fallacy which is deliberately used to get something from the other person. Manipulation by deception is the art which forms…