TWO PERSPECTIVES ON POVERTY: There are many different perspectives on poverty. The two that will be discussed in the paper are that of Bill Gates and that of Thomas Pogge. It is very interesting to study the perspective of Bill Gates on poverty. He has emerged as a very successful person in the field of business and technology and now his success as a social responsibility champion has made him a figure to be considered for his views on poverty. His views on poverty are quite different than the usual views that are prevalent in the market today. His ideas to quite an extent are controversial and therefore make a very interesting study. Though he is very new to the field his views are worth considering because he has allocated a sum of 38.7 billion dollars to help the social cause and help make this world a better place to live. Thomas Pogge is considered to be one of the most known figures in the world on the topic of Global Justice and poverty. He has many researches to his name and is also the author of the best known published book World Poverty and Human Rights. The views on poverty and the possible things that hamper reduction of poverty, things that cause poverty and also what are the solutions to eradicate poverty are all very different and contrasting and therefore make an interesting study. Non?Maleficence v. ...
In fact, Pogge has very clearly mentioned in his writings that in his opinion World Trade Organization has opened the market too little and this is a contributing factor to poverty. Gates and Pogge both believe that the increasing global wealth inequities help in solving the issue of poverty. They both again agree on the fact that poverty is a very pressing issue and should be dealt with effectively and efficiently. The differences in their perspectives becomes very clear when we see that Gates believes that beneficence is the way we can reduce poverty and Pogge is of the opinion that to reduce poverty we need to be non?maleficence. This is one contrasting feature in their opinion of existence of poverty and therefore it becomes the base of the different ways which they will employee to reduce poverty. Gates has suggested that we can reduce poverty effectively and in a long lasting way, by being more benevolent. This opinion of his clearly suggests that he is not looking to get rid of poverty completely. His realistic opinion is that poverty can surely be reduced but it cannot be gotten rid of completely. His opinion however, in no way indicates that he wants people to remain poor. In a contrasting opinion Pogge believes the global institutional order should be formed again as it does nothing to reduce poverty but in fact promotes it. In Pogge’s opinion poverty is a problem that has been created because of the issue of global justice and he believes that institutions inflict harm on each other and that this should be stopped. He believes that to reduce poverty global, injustice should be reduced along with socioeconomic poverty. He also believes that the inaccessibility that
[Instructor Name] GLOBAL JUSTICE AND THE POOR There are two different categories of people in the society that we live in. One is the poor one and the other are the rich ones. It has been like this since the times, when humans started living in the form of societies and in groups…
Great inequalities are observable between different people within each society, and between societies as a whole, and yet most people would agree that it is a good thing for governments, corporations, international agencies and individuals to strive towards social justice.
The most significant problem associated with the fact is that the poor and minority people are discriminated by the criminal justice system of US. There are some racial discriminations while rendering justice to these people. This is not a new problem for the poor and minority people living there, rather a major problem existent for a long time (Cole, 1999, p.
An understanding of the relationship of social justice with the civil rights movement will be sought after which the various theories and concepts surrounding social justice examined. The paper also looks at the role of community with regards to global social justice in the context of the theories and concepts to arrive at an acceptable conclusion.
Let us begin the assessment by understanding some major problems associated with the difficulty in achieving inalienable rights to freedom, justice and a fair opportunity – or widely known as the essential components of American Dream. The Assessment According to Bobo and Thomson (2006) the US is in the midst of struggle in achieving these basic and important components of civil rights due to some issues concerning race, crime and legal system that one could specifically observe in the case of African Americans who are under the threat of receiving inequality in the emancipation of law.
It is unfortunate that these inequalities are more than the estate was about 50 years ago. It is unfortunate that from the many that with the changes taking place in the world today, there are higher cases of inequalities than in the previous years (Schaefer 2007, p23).
In the same way, opinions between countries are likely to be clashed as well and, sometimes, it becomes exceedingly difficult to settle their disputes effectively. Therefore, in such cases, a country with great power and authority steps in to guide the world by taking the headship in its hands in order to ensure equality and justice around the world.
The author states that if a claim is made for the future generations, then it will be possible to take away from the current world order, which has certainly been responsible for much of the earth’s environmental damage, the power to continue doing what it is currently doing so that there might be a break from the environmental degradation.
Based on these foundations, nations sought to fight to keep their interests and protect their desires and expectations. The division of the modern nations in the early 1900s laid the foundations for the most extensive and most destructive wars in history – the two World Wars.
The historically accepted Hobbes document, Social Contract, affirms that justice is based on compliance with the social contract. The Social Contract document is the brainchild of Thomas Hobbes. The document affirms that a person who did not sign or enter into any contract is not bound by the contract.
4 pages (1000 words)Essay
Get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Didn't find an essay?
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com