Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Euthyphro (Platos Early Dialogues) - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
College
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 10 (2510 words)

Summary

Instructor Date Euthyphro Dilemma In Plato’s dialogue, the Euthyphro, Socrates presents an argument against a common moral perception that morality or piety is a matter of what the gods’ commands. This makes Socrates to pose the following questions, is the right or pious being loved by the gods because it is pious or it is right or pious because it is being loved by the gods?…

Extract of sample
Euthyphro (Platos Early Dialogues)

Does God call something right or moral because it is right or moral or does is something right or moral because God calls it moral? Therefore, if God calls an act moral because it is moral, then morality or goodness will be seen as priori to Gods Command and thus, it is independent of God. On the other hand, if an act is moral because God says it is moral or right, then it implies that whatever God says it is right (Hamilton and Cairns 37). In addition, this also implies that Gods command of what is moral is arbitrary since the same God could have willed contrary commands. The dialogue presents the challenge that was intended to make us think about the nature of morality. Therefore, when Socrates asks Euthyphro about his definition of the word piety, Euthyphro was required to identify the nature of virtue or morality by establishing on what ground does morality or virtue stand on. It is difficult for an atheist to discover the ground on which morality stands on because they claim that they can have ethics or morals without God. Certainly, an atheist can behave in a way that people perceive moral or good but it is really hard to define what the term ultimately means (Plato 10a). ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Plato's Dialogues
Eventually, the son is taught the unjust speech which enabled them to get rid of the creditors. However, the son also does not spare his father but gives him a beating due to a disagreement on recitation of poetry and justifies his actions using sophistry. The father gets angry and burns the Thinkery as well as chasing students away for deceiving him. What is then the difference between Socrates of the cloud and Socrates of platonic dialogues? These two present Socrates as two different individuals or an individual having two personalities. In the clouds Aristophanes portrays Socrates as an…
20 pages (5020 words)
Euthyphro : Plato
The dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro represents that form of a dialogue that makes one understand the ideas of piety and holiness as they existed during the ancient Greek period. In this dialogue, Euthyphro talks of several definitions of what constitutes piety. To begin with, he defines piety through an example of what he does at a certain point of time in his life. This is the prosecution of his own father for the crimes that he has committed (Plato). While this may appear to us as a great example of virtue and holiness, it is precisely that- an example of holiness. It cannot be…
3 pages (753 words)
Euthyphro : Plato
In the dialogue, the idea of holiness emerges so that the concept of morality is well understood. For instance, Socrates argues that if an act is moral because God says it is moral or right, then it implies that whatever God says is right is right. In addition, this also implies that Gods command of what is moral is arbitrary since the same God could have willed contrary commands. Therefore, when Socrates asks Euthyphro about his definition of the word piety, Euthyphro was required to identify the nature of virtue or morality by establishing on what ground does morality or virtue stand on. It…
3 pages (753 words)
Euthyphro
Because their opinions about holiness are at odds, Socrates who is portrayed by Plato as a person who is eager to engage in discourse with the people on Athens asks Euthyphro what his concept of holiness is so he might learn from how Euthyphro defines it. Says Socrates, “Tell me then, what is the pious, and what the impious, do you say?” (5e) Initially, this is how the concept of holiness emerges in the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro and it soon takes a prominent position in the dialogue as it becomes the main topic of their conversation as they wait to be shown into court for…
3 pages (753 words)
Euthyphro : Plato
Out of this situation, hence, emerges the issue of defining ‘piety’ or ‘holiness’ in which Socrates takes advantage of his humble condition, being accused of ‘impiety’, to find resolution to the question of piety through his philosophical dialogue with Euthyphro. By his initial attempt to address the inquiry of Socrates, Euthyphro claims “Piety is doing what I’m doing now” in reference to his provision of charges against his father which is based upon the traditional justice known in Greek mythology, as when gods do not let their fathers go unpunished despite strength of…
3 pages (753 words)
Euthyphro : Plato
In the beginning of the work, Socrates is shocked that one could take their father to trial on charges of manslaughter; deeming it to be so far outside the conventions of the law and of society that it is almost incomprehensible morally and/or judicially. Euthyphro, on the other hand, focuses on the piety of the son and courage that he must have had in order to perform such an action; referening the fact that a universal belief in goodness and the justice of the rule of law overcame even the strict moral dictates of respect. Exemplifying Socratic irony, Socrates states that he wishes to learn…
3 pages (753 words)
Euthyphro : Plato
Socrates is the accused in his case. A young man accuses him of corrupting his fellow youth. He alleges that Socrates creates new gods who he uses to replace the old ones through his writing. According to the youth, Socrates is one of the poets who falsify religious information. The two engage in friendly courtesies and small talks that reveal the purpose of each other’s visit (Jowett, 1994). Coincidentally, both cases lean heavily on religion. Both characters want to employ the interpretation of religious law when arguing out a case. They begin discussing various elements of the religion…
3 pages (753 words)