Is it unethical to test on animals,even if the testing helps save human lives?

Is it unethical to test on animals,even if the testing helps save human lives? Essay example
Masters
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
Ethical Issues Involved in Animal Testing Introduction There are a number of controversial issues that still pervade contemporary times. The controversiality of argument depends on the disparities of perspectives, not only of the opposing parties; but more so, on its overall effect to society or humanity…

Introduction

It is this conceptual framework that leads to the argument: Is it unethical to test on animals, even if the testing helps save human lives? One is convinced that the rationale for ethically justifying testing on animals should not solely be based on saving human lives, but also in considering the selection, procedures, conditions, and purpose or intent, within which animals are tested to serve the paramount purpose of saving lives. The current discourse would therefore be presented by initially presenting the arguments which state that animal testing is unethical, even if the testing helps save human lives. The next section would discuss contentions that view animal testing as ethical. Finally, an analysis and recommendation portion would assert that a balanced argument would justify testing on animals with proposed courses of action. Animal Testing is Unethical The arguments that support the unethical view of animal testing include Tom Regan’s assertions in his written discourse entitled The Case for Animal Rights (University of California Press, 1983) which affirmed that “animals cannot be experimented on, because they are not merely means to an end” (Mukerjee, 1997, p. 87). ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Non-Human Animals
He finishes it off with the fact that nonhuman wildlife can be regarded as no more than machineries with chunks brought together in complex ways. Centered on Descartes’ underlying principle, human beings have a very little accountability to other natures or the natural world, unless their behavior has an emotional impact on other humans. (Hergenhahn, 2005, pp. 164). Rene Descartes, seemingly…
Is killing animals , or making them suffer, for human ends morally defensible?
My opinion extends to other human activities that put harm animal which are not necessary, such as poaching or game hunting or animal fights. There is a fundamental moral principle which permits us to share a kind of equal treatment that concerns all human beings and with every kind of differences that exist between and every one of us. I believe that this moral code is not only limited to human…
All Animals are Equal
The case of animals is very similar to those of the exploited people, we must treat them like human beings because even they feel the pain and react to it, and it is our duty to stop these animals from getting exploited and from getting treated like dirt. They have every right in the world to be treated well and to be shown love and affection. All human beings are capable of logical thinking and…
Unethical Business Behavior (Monastato company)
Unethical Business Behavior (Monastato company) …
Non-human Animals Can Be Agents of Morality
From de Waal’s account, it is evident that animals especially chimpanzees can actually be moral agents. The basic concept in understanding the ability of animals to be moral agents is the evaluation of how human morality is distinguished from chimpanzee “morality”. De Waal envisages that human morality develops from the morality of our common ancestors. Morality emerges gradually, becoming…
equality for animals
The principle of equality can be considered as one of the major concepts used by Singer in his article i.e. ‘equality for animals’. The concept was supported with different notions which define that the term equality should encompass the practice of a clear understanding of the nature along with its principles concerning equal consideration of interests. Moreover, Singer has also mentioned…
Equality for Animals?
In case of animals the mental or psychological aspect do not play much role. This differentiation has not been made because the animal equality is based mainly on physical torment aspect. He author mentions the point “not have interests because it cannot suffer” but here it is not clear as to what kind of interest he is talking of. The explanation provided in this context is ambiguous because…