StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant - Essay Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant

He goes on to observe that only good will is good sans qualification. Good will is always good in itself and not just for the things that it produces. Will is good if will comes from duty, as well as other moral motives, which do not simply conform to duty. For instance, grocers who give the right change because of fairness, rather than from the fear of being caught, do so from good will. The reasoning goal is not in producing happiness but rather producing will that can be seen to be good in it. The satisfaction of man’s desires, which is happiness, is not determinate enough to use as a workable guide. Good will cannot act as the complete and sole good, although it is the worthy condition of being happy and the highest good. Complete good can only be goodwill combined with happiness. Rationality possesses its own laws of objectiveness. Because man is rational only partially, he experiences the various laws as constraints and imperatives that he is required to follow. These imperatives are grounded on the premise that is valid for all rational beings as such. These imperatives, according to Kant, could be hypothetical, i.e. if one wants to get to end E, then he should do A, or categorical, which is he ought to perform A. Ethics that are based on imperatives that are hypothetical are heteronymous because they involve following laws set by another. Categorical imperatives are hard to understand, although their content is clear. ...Show more

Summary

Immanuel Kant considers old philosophical problems using new methods. Kant defends morality from reduction to self-interest, empirical fact, or feelings. Rather, he bases his supreme moral principle on reason…
Author : rhiannon77
What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Ethics (David Hume and Kant)
Kant professes a secular and universal kind of morality while Hume's argument is highly subjective and could be very problematic in its applications. Hume has observed that it is our modern philosophers who define morality on pure reason and in contrast to that our ancient thinkers have considered “morals as deriving their existence from taste and sentiment”
7 pages (1750 words) Essay
The Metaphysics of Morals by Emmanual Kant
To shed light on the metaphysics of Morals, it is first important to study the context of the work. In this regard, Immanuel Kant and his background need to be discussed to locate the study within a framework. Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher of the eighteenth century and his works mostly focus on philosophy and anthropology, with Metaphysics of Morals being one of his most dominant works.
24 pages (6000 words) Essay
Kant and Hume on Morality
Kant’s “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals” is an attempt in this direction while Hume’s “An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals” justifies his views. Both pieces of work are contrasted below. Kant’s concepts are discussed first followed by Hume’s concepts.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Kant vs. Hume on Moral Reasoning
Kant preached the categorical imperative, in which he stated that the principles of Universality and Reversibility (both of which will be discussed ahead in the paper) should guide human reasoning and behavior. On the other hand Hume gave precedence to human feelings over any abstract relations of rules of Universality and Reversibility as the guiding principles of human actions.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
A Distinction Between Practical Anthropology And Moral Philosophy
The works of Kant (1728-1804), a German philosopher, are mostly drawn from the observations and his own ideas on the nature of humans. The major emphasis of this philosopher is on the priori or pure part of the moral philosophy.
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
: Hume is regarded as an empiricist; but he should be seen as Empiricism's greatest critic. Discuss
.(they) should try to observe how they do so” (Kemerling, 2001), and based on these observations come to logical conclusions. Eschewing any evidence not based on
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Essay about Kant, Hume or Aristotle
On the other hand Hume gave precedence to human feelings over any abstract relations of rules of Universality and Reversibility as the guiding principles of human actions. In
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Philosophy and art/plato, nehamas/hume/kant
Majority of critics in art and literature have not only been enthralled by Plato’s views on the ‘Republic’ but also questioned on the validity of mimesis in art. Other critics have opted to understand the
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Practical Anthropology and Moral Philosophy Distinction
The difference between Kant’s moral philosophy and the empirical moral philosophy is that the later is biased towards the posterior principles or those that are garnered through the observations and experiences of human beings. Kant, using this distinction, referred to the empirical moral philosophy as moral anthropology.
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
The author notes that there are three general strategies used by moral philosophers who wish to explain the sort of variation in moral codes discussed by Ruth Benedict. Which of
While Kant worked towards laying a foundation for ethics and morality that would enable many of the tenets that people believe in to have a firm grounding, Hume
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT