What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant?

What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant? Essay example
Masters
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Download 0
Immanuel Kant considers old philosophical problems using new methods. Kant defends morality from reduction to self-interest, empirical fact, or feelings. Rather, he bases his supreme moral principle on reason…

Introduction

He goes on to observe that only good will is good sans qualification. Good will is always good in itself and not just for the things that it produces. Will is good if will comes from duty, as well as other moral motives, which do not simply conform to duty. For instance, grocers who give the right change because of fairness, rather than from the fear of being caught, do so from good will. The reasoning goal is not in producing happiness but rather producing will that can be seen to be good in it. The satisfaction of man’s desires, which is happiness, is not determinate enough to use as a workable guide. Good will cannot act as the complete and sole good, although it is the worthy condition of being happy and the highest good. Complete good can only be goodwill combined with happiness. Rationality possesses its own laws of objectiveness. Because man is rational only partially, he experiences the various laws as constraints and imperatives that he is required to follow. These imperatives are grounded on the premise that is valid for all rational beings as such. These imperatives, according to Kant, could be hypothetical, i.e. if one wants to get to end E, then he should do A, or categorical, which is he ought to perform A. Ethics that are based on imperatives that are hypothetical are heteronymous because they involve following laws set by another. Categorical imperatives are hard to understand, although their content is clear. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Ethics (David Hume and Kant)
Hume tries to anchor his definition of morals in human sentiments, he is seen to stray away into pure rhetoric. For example, Hume has said, “what is honourable, what is fair, what is becoming, what is noble, what is generous, takes possession of the heart, and animates us to embrace and maintain it” (4). In contrast to this he (Hume) claims that “what is intelligible, what is evident, what…
The Metaphysics of Morals by Emmanual Kant
Kant has spent most of his life in a German town, Konigsberg, which was located near East Prussia. He had also taught in the Konigsberg University and had maintained a descent reputation in all these years, thus by the age of fifty, much of his work on natural sciences as well as philosophy had been published and gained much momentum in the German literary community. Later in his life, Kant had…
Kant and Hume on Morality
Later on these views are critically analysed to establish which point of view is better. Kant Kant argues for an a priori basis for morality in his work. The central concept is the “categorical imperative”. The author sees morality springing from nothing other than pure reason. This contradicts Hume directly who held that reason could never be ground to justify morality. However, Kant states…
Kant vs. Hume on Moral Reasoning
In Hume’s opinion, what individuals strongly feel about as being good, right and moral is what actually defines what is right and what is wrong, as opposed to them feeling obliged to do something right without their will just because it is thought to be the right thing. If we analyze both these arguments in isolation, they are both valid to an extent. However, from the perspective of morality,…
Plato versus Nehamas & Kant versus Hume
Majority of critics in art and literature have not only been enthralled by Plato’s views on the ‘Republic’ but also questioned on the validity of mimesis in art. Other critics have opted to understand the reliability of Plato’s mimesis by criticizing his works. In his work on ‘Republic’, part three, Plato banishes some of the imitations used by Aristotle but agrees to their use in…
A Distinction Between Practical Anthropology And Moral Philosophy
The works of Kant (1728-1804), a German philosopher, are mostly drawn from the observations and his own ideas on the nature of humans. The major emphasis of this philosopher is on the priori or pure part of the moral philosophy. He strongly believes that in the operation of moral philosophy, the major determinant is inherent in reason and is also revealed through it. The difference between…
Kant, Fundamental Principles
Because if the will behind these things are bad, so will the actions be bad. Intelligence can be used to create things which help the world or which harm it. Courage can be good in the fact of danger or it can exercised without moderation and result in more danger.…