The liberty of every person is an essential factor for governance; as one is able to demand their right as well as play a role in the way they are governed by freedom of speech and demonstration. In this essay am solely going to expound on what Mill advocated for in his quest for liberty in his country as its written in his book On liberty. Mill had a strong believe on the liberty of an individual and had his strong points to back his reasoning at such a time when many governments were transitioning and locked out any idea of a person trying to criticize or influence other citizens. One of his greatest opinions was on the fact that there should be different experiments of living. This was based on the fact that human beings are flawed in their way of acting and reasoning, but this should not be a determinant of what they could be permitted to do or not to do. He argued that opinions of any individual should be done in action as long they did not interfere with the lives of others around them. To him as long a person’s opinions could be freely formed and expressed, so should be his actions on the same opinion. According to Mill societies had to factor this opinion in action the same way they had considered it just as an opinion. He stated that if an individual chooses to follow his opinion in what he/ she believes is right, they should be allowed to put into action. Actions meant that an individual could do whatever he/ she values to be right and justified as long as they never complicate the lives of others around them. According to Mill, the process of taking opinions into another level which was action had to be acceptable by the fact that a number of characters about an individual are not likely to harm others around him/ her (Mill & John, 2008). Stuart Mill had a strong stand to the opinion that experimenting with the ways of living allowed for the different ways of life to be proved practically. From his understanding, Mill thought that it was worth asserting oneself or individual in things that did not concern others around them. Been free meant being able to put into practice what you believed in despite of the immediate environment that surrounded you. This action a person chooses to employ should be genuine and based on good reasoning. An individual action should not cross over to another person’s privacy or border. Therefore, John Stuart Mill was basing his understanding on the different opportunities that life offers to every liberal minded singular and the ability to take advantage of it to try opinions they have in real life. The term experimenting with life was based on the factors stated herein. Experimenting meant giving a chance to an opinion a person has to be put into action. This idea was thus based on liberty to do practical things in life based on opinion an individual has. His ability to reason and see things at a different angle was outstanding and so reasonable. Mill believed in the power of giving every person a fair chance to live life fully without limitations by any one or rule (Mill & John, 2008). Mill further discussed his opinion on the right to act as a person pleases. He stated that there is no one
Insert your name Instructor Course Date due Liberty of conscience and individuality A civil servant and political economist, he was the most influential philosopher in his era during the nineteenth century. His fight for the acceptance of liberty for every individual was the most impactful compared to any other philosopher like John Stuart Mill is a public figure to reckon with as his role as a philosopher during his time was the most impactful in the lives of his fellow citizens…
The democratic rule of the majority is paradoxically ethical and tyrannical. “Democracy in America,” by Alexis De Tocqueville analyzes the tyranny of the majority theory and its role in forming political ideology and the constitution in America. In England, John Stuart Mill in “On Liberty” also describes the social and political effects of the tyranny of the majority.
From a couple of previous decades, it is evident that something could be incorrect with how we live our lives. This is because the pursuit for wealth acquisition turned out to be a top note virtue for many.
This paper discusses the liberty of conscience and liberty of individuality. Conscience can be defined as individual’s moral sense of right and wrong and is based on so many factors such as spirituality, philosophy, and societal norms. That is, moral judgment will apply before a person takes any decision or initiate any action.
It is important to mention that an individual does not have a combination of personal features from their parents, but possesses a varied set of character features from a number of ancestors from both parental sides. Excluding absolutely identical twins, each of us possesses unique biochemistry, which leads to relatively different nutritional needs.
Positive freedom-based theories point out a very obvious weakness of this position; namely, that one of the activities that most often limits the freedom of some individuals is the expression of freedom in others and as well as within themselves. This is a problem for political theorists because while it seems relatively straightforward to argue in favor of limiting political power in the name of liberty, it is not at all straightforward how to limit individual liberties in the name of, well, individual liberties.