Inequalities in the exercise of power and disregard to justice are even more evidenced in the political scene in various regions around the world today. Such always stem from the need to advance once own course by ignoring and disregarding other people who they consider rather inadequate. Stigall, Blacksley and Jenks argue that an interesting scene is always created where people especially the government authorities always insist on maintaining their rights while at the same time violating and stepping on the rights of their own subjects. (Stigall, Blacksley and Jenks, 2009). This is a common occurrence experienced with most of the sovereignties around the globe today. The aspect of exercising single handed rule on the subject population is mostly experienced in dictatorial countries such as Syria, Egypt, Iraq, alongside other Arab countries famous for dictatorial cases. This is contrary to what Hobbes refers to in his social contract theory, leaving the state of nature and looking at the advancement of one’s own course at the expense of the others in the territory (subjects). According to the social contract theory, it is those in higher social ranks who seem to deserve their rights while those of the lower social ranking are often considered incapable of demanding for any form of rights. As a result of this, their rights are always abused in a bid to preserve those of the power in the society. This paper will look at the effects of electing a sovereign with regard to the protection of state rights and the protection of the people under this rule with reference to the Arab countries and democracy in these regions. Hobbes proposes in his theory that the election of a sovereign in any state always results in the creation of the state of nature in the regions under the control of the sovereign (Saul, 2008). This theory, I think does not hold enough water in as much as I know and believe given the many atrocities which have been experienced in many of the Arab countries such as Syria and Egypt in the recent past. Having the sovereigns in these states has done nothing much other than inflicting a lot of troubles and augmenting the rise in cases of inequalities in these states. These happen as the sovereigns strive to uphold their own rights at the expense of the other citizens. Many people have succumbed to death in these countries as they try to protest to regain their rights. The question in this case therefore is whether this is what Hobbes refers to as the creation of a state of nature. The state of nature according to my understanding with regard to the social and political contexts is when the ruling authority strikes a balance with the citizens under her rule to allow the participation and full regard of the subjects in state affairs. It is far from having the central government designing and deciding on every aspect of leadership. The contrary is however the truth in most of the sovereign ruling systems as in the cases of Syria and Egypt we have mentioned above. Brown and Hamzawy note that “The tragic developments in Lebanon and Palestine- all with weak or failed state institutions- have enable Arab democracy pessimists dismiss easily any talk about positive political reforms as the fantasy of the western well- intentioned humanists- or misguided ideologues- who do not understand the real
Insert name Name of institution Name of professor Date Introduction Man is an irrational being who will always fight to advance his sovereignty in all spheres of life. Indeed until one achieves what he wants in life, man will never relax…
A sovereign state has a governmental institution that has an authority, over a specific geographical location. The State is the only institution allowed to use force, and has people who permanently reside in the state. The State has the ability to negotiate on issues of its interest at the international arena.
Emergence of Red Power movement in 1960s Outline Introduction History of Red power movement Causes for the Emergence of Red Power Movement Conclusion Bibliography Emergence of Red Power movement in 1960s Introduction Red power was a force to reckon with in the 1960s.
Stepping outside the precise limits of presidential power as given by Article II of the United States Constitution, there is a wide variability in how individuals treat the office. Some presidents, like Thomas Jefferson, have found the office to be a challenging place to maintain both one’s principles and one’s power; others, like Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt, have used the authority vested in the office to pursue their particular political agendas and enlarging the scope of the presidency.
The constitution sets down the limits and extent of powers while on the other hand it also distributes these powers (Big Tent Democrat, 2011). Introduction The commerce clause is entrenched in the United States Constitution under Article 1; Section 8 Clause 3 of the constitution, which states that the congress among several other powers conferred upon it by the constitution, will have the power to regulate commerce within foreign nations, and among other states and also regarding the Indian tribes.
The emergence of globalization has led to the inception of controversy that increased globalization is fading away the role, authority, and sovereignty of state. This paper intends to explain two opinions regarding state sovereignty and globalization.
This Pope is considered the father of the medieval Papacy. His accession to the Papacy was accepted only after a severe interior struggle. Pope Gregory the great used power to ascend to the papacy and this is how his era is defined. Pope Gregory found Italy and the papacy in an alarming state.
Solar energy was discovered much before the 20th century, though it became more common and widely employed after the first half of the 20 century. Since then, harnessing and utilization of the solar energy has increased manifolds. Today, it is used as a renewable
The distinction between the two implies that there exist some rules and criteria that allows the legitimate power to be judged (Cossins, 2000, p.31). Political power, for instance, is legitimate if it is obtained from a decree derived from a community so that
According to Agnew, regimes of effectual sovereignty are on the grounds of distinctive composition of central state authority and the level of political territoriality. He further tells more about the types of the