Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Hard Treatment - Assignment Example

Only on StudentShare
College
Author : amosryan
Assignment
Philosophy
Pages 6 (1506 words)

Summary

The Hardness of Hard Treatment Name Tutor Course College Date Kileinig has differentiated imprisonment method of punishment from detention. He has categorized imprisonment as the modern punishment to the offenders. It has superseded the various traditional forms of legal punishment…

Extract of sample
Hard Treatment

The eighteenth century corporal punishment was done through the offender’s body. In the nineteenth century, the imprisonment move was merged with other penalties that prompted the decrease of the human rights. This was a response to the wrongdoers. In that case, Kleinig views imprisonment as a form of reforming ones villainous character or immoral habit. Below are the some of positive and negative constraints according to the kleinig’s point of view of the prisoners subjected to punishments. Kleinig has found that cruelty inflicts physical pain on the prisoners. This has been extremely exaggerated to the general suffering of these people. He argues that such actions which come in with cruelty are imposed to these people to cause aguish and fear in them for the respect of the department stuff. Some of these cruel activities done to the prisoners may end up to injuries either mentally or physically. Kleinig believe that both individuals and institutions are cruel to the prisoners. According to the research, many deaths that are reported from the prisons are caused by the prisoners themselves. In that case, he has notified that though punishments are given to rectify and rehabilitate the wrongdoers, being cruelty would be excessive punishment which would not be helpful but only destroying. This would also limit the people to achieving the goals that are accepted in the social life. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Why does Lewis [Lewis Harry A. (1998) ‘Consciousness: Inexplicable – And Useless Too?’] object to Chalmers’ view of the ‘hard problem’?
He attributes all that we intimately know to the experience of conscience, yet he suggests that indeed, there is nothing so hard that lacks human explanation. Mental phenomena have always been vulnerable to the influence posed by scientific investigations. However, Chalmer debates that the consciousness has always found a way and reason to resist such things in a stubborn way. The explanations given by those considered scholarly have often failed to meet the required target1. He further states that many people have been lured into believing that problems are intractable and for that reason…
6 pages (1506 words)
Philosophy Essay: Euthanasia
There are different categories of Euthanasia such as voluntary, involuntary and non-voluntary. I am going to talk about Voluntary Euthanasia although its practice is still opposed by many people. According to McDougall, Gorman and Roberts (2008), unlike voluntary euthanasia, Involuntary Euthanasia is done by taking someone’s life without his consent to relieve suffering. Sometimes, non-voluntary is also categorized as involuntary, but the two are different. This is because non-voluntary euthanasia occurs when the patient is unavailable like in child euthanasia. There is a lot debate on this…
7 pages (1757 words)
Crime and Human Rights Violation
Although some of them would enter such competition voluntarily for the prize money or prestige, majority of them could not refuse for being slaves or prisoners stripped of rights granted to other human beings. Albert Camus, the mid-20th century philosopher, discoursed in “The Rebel” (Camus 6) the illogical defense of violation of human rights by the holder of power. No one can question the atrocities and genocide committed before the start of the Common Era. But it would seem absurd that such acts were committed by people in power in modern times when people are expected to act and behave…
5 pages (1255 words)
Ethical Dilemma of Illegal Immigrant Seeking Treatment
However, the car did not stop after the hit and as a result Santana was forced to run to the nearest emergency department despite the deep pain he was in. The medical history of the patient reveals that he has no health insurance. Furthermore, the patient is one of the undocumented immigrants from Mexico who has stayed in America for three years. With notable hesitation Santana explains to the nurse that he lives with his relatives who are also illegal immigrants. The nurse discovers that the patient has a broken arm and needs immediate medical care and close monitoring. Without mush thought…
6 pages (1506 words)
faith healing case
He provided the boy’s parents with information regarding the treatment that is available, and then explained to them the procedures that would have to be undertaken. The parents discussed the matter between themselves for two hours, and then told the physician that they had reached the decision to take their son to a faith healing service instead of seeking medical intervention. The physician tried to convince them of the futility of this action but to no avail. The parents left with their son after the physician gave them a return appointment, but they did not honor it. II. Ethical Question…
3 pages (753 words)
Compare and contrast the three leading theories of free will: (1) Libertarianism, (2) Hard determinism, (3) Compatabilism. Be su
b) Hard determinism. It is a concept of free will that claims that determinism is true and that it is not in line with free will, thereby making free will inexistence. It differs profoundly from soft determinism since soft determinism believes that free will may exist even despite determinism. This philosophy differs with metaphysical libertarianism, which claims that free will exists and falsifies determinism. c) Compatibilism. Often referred as soft determinism, Compatibilism is a philosophy which states that free will and determinism are agreeable ideas, and it is possible to for them to be…
4 pages (1004 words)
The Difference Between An Egalitarian And A Non-Egalitarian Principle Of Distribution. Which One Is Preferable?
In this philosophy, people ought to get the same, be treated equally, treat our friend as equal, and all people should enjoy equal social status. The egalitarianism principles rest on the background that all mankind are equal in fundamental worth and moral status. Although these principles are widely accepted, there exist variant views especially in Western European and Anglo American philosophical traditions. Egalitarians believe that equality and justice are closely well connected. Firstly, they think unfair life prospects should be equalized. Secondly, equality is the most important…
6 pages (1506 words)