Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Pages 8 (2008 words)


SOCIETY NEEDS TO BE DEFENDED AGAINST SCIENCE Name: Course: Professor: Institution: Location: Date: Paul Karl Feyerabend; Society Needs to be Defended against Science Introduction Paul Karl Feyerabend was a philosopher of science born in Australia. He is famed for his contribution in philosophy while working as professor in University of California, Berkeley where he worked for thirty years (1958-1989)…

Extract of sample
evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia

In these two books, he expresses and defends his ideas on the nature of scientific methods, concluding that there are no ground rules on governing scientific methods. He opposed the idea of having a single rigid scientific process to which all scientific research is carried out with the argument that this would make science predictable thus denying it the opportunity to evolve (Feyerabend 2000). In this study, Feyerabend shows that new findings in science, on which theories are later founded, have enormous influence from past events, theoriesand facts. Scientists researching in a new area of study do not only apply old scientific methods in fresh observations but they also observe the field under study under the mental influence of old theories and already existing facts. To this effect, much of their findings will be subjected towards what they already know in this field, such that their new work appears to marchnew observations to old facts and while improving them to come up with new theories. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

As a result, there have been conflicts as to the reliability of science or religion as sources of knowledge, which in turn affects people’s acquisition of new knowledge. In view of this, the aim of this paper is to show how faith in science and religion affect people’s acquisition of new knowledge. Knowledge can be pursued through religion or science, though they both use different…
4 pages (1004 words)
Science and Religion
What are, for instance, the fundamental characteristics of science and how do those characteristics differ from those of religion? These kinds of central questions, dealing with both metaphysics and epistemology, are incredibly relevant to modern society, which is increasingly realizing the importance of science’s contributions to quality of life. Nevertheless, while progress in scientific…
Philosophy of Science Essay
Karl Popper on the other hand was the totalitarian and unadventurous proponent of positivism. Karl and Popper were the contemporaries and criticized each other’s work. The comparison on the philosophies of Kuhn and Popper following attributes are taken into consideration: 1. Differentiation between science and non science Popper opined that science is a method of trial and error. It is a method…
4 pages (1004 words)
Does the (apparently) Value-Laden Nature of Science give us Reason to Doubt the Objectivity and Reliability of Science?
In the paragraphs that follow I try to identify salient arguments put forward by leading scientists representative of the epistemology under review. Science may be defined as the human endeavour to explore, investigate and understand the physical universe. Scientific method used to gain knowledge of natural phenomena includes observation, forming hypotheses or theories, conducting experiments to…
4 pages (1004 words)
Why does Ruse say that Creationism should not be understood as a Science
The two have not had fecund collaboration in history except the uneasy relationship philosophy, religion and science had during the medieval period. Called the dark ages, it shows that combining religion, philosophy and science does little good, if any. The burning of Giordano Bruno at the stake for pushing the envelope past what the church accepted underscores the uneasy marriage that was…
3 pages (753 words)
Critically evaluate feminist arguments against the present system of science.
The movement also argued that science, besides perpetuating inequalities between sexes, is excessively focused on rational positivism, specifically on matters of objectivity, exactness, and certainty that seemed in conflict with feminism’s political ideals (Potter, 2006), and specifically with the development of a feminist science that focuses on women’s interests. Feminist Critiques of…
6 pages (1506 words)
Against Method. Is the approach to science a valid form of inquiry?
Paul Feyerabend’s Against Method challenges modern science in various aspects. He believes that contemporary science has been unchallenged for many years, and its methodologies and assumptions require to be reviewed.He asserts that people can comprehend scientific advances by focusing in historical contexts. He analyzes how the philosophy of science has constantly overstressed on practice over…
4 pages (1004 words)