Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Compare And Contrast The Theories Advanced By Mill And Kant By Applying Them To A Specific Situation. - Research Paper Example

Free
Author : ruben91
Download 0

Summary

Capital punishment is basically death punishment or the penalty to death or the act of executing. This act is committed by the state for any such crime that has been committed and requires execution…

Extract of sample
Compare And Contrast The Theories Advanced By Mill And Kant By Applying Them To A Specific Situation.

Considering the brutality of this punishment it has been abandoned in most countries of the world. Today some American countries are still practicing this punishment. Undoubtedly, it won't be wrong to say that the death penalty is the harshest form of punishment that persists in the world. Today the easiest way to execute this punishment is by inducing the lethal injections. Capital punishment has turned out to be a topic of immense debate and hence is a very controversial and contradictory topic. Those who side this form of punishment believe that his punishment helps to reduce the level of crime and deserves for those who commit such offensive crimes whereas those who contradict this approach believe that the better way to punish such people is through life imprisonment and at times this extreme punishment can also be enforced on those who are convicted in a wrong manner.Hence they say that the life imprisonment leads to better options. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

How are the categorical imperative (Kant) and/or the greatest happiness principle (Mill) applied in law?
Two particular theories or principles that have been applied in law are Categorical Imperative (CI) by Immanuel Kant and the Greatest Happiness Principle (GHP) by Stuart Mill. Kant’s categorical imperative theory provides a way of evaluating the motives behind an action. According to Kant1 (27), an imperative refers to any proposition that declares a particular action or inaction as necessary. Obligations and duties are therefore derived from these imperatives. On the other hand, a categorical imperative refers to a requirement that is absolute and unconditional, and asserts its authority in…
4 pages (1004 words)
Compare and contrast the ethical theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant
Man should be oriented by entities in his or her environment of the definition of what is morally good or not. However, if one should ask, what makes an ethical person? What are the characteristics that make him a good person? Aristotle and Kant’s ethical theories have laid out arguments claiming man’s ethics. However, there are significant ideas that make one theory triumph over the other. Aristotle and Kant speak of the highest good that man can do to society and his own – one that is not to be done just for the sake of being called ethical, getting material possessions or pleasing…
4 pages (1004 words)
Comparing Philosophical Positions of Kant and of John Stuart Mill
This research paper considers ideas of Kant and Mill and applies them for the issues of war in the modern global world. Utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Deontology of Kant can be compared and contrasted. In the modern context the main ideas of these great philosophers can be implemented in the context of modern political events. Whether there is a need for utilitarian morals and laws or whether it is much important to focus on individual values–these considerations are provided by Kant and Mill. Mill’s Utilitarianism. Mill developed the Greatest Happiness Principle, which he explains…
4 pages (1004 words)
Kant
In addition, these laws are not only made by these beings, but these beings are also subject to the laws, which have been made. Every rational or human nature is based on the autonomy of the beings, which is practiced by them. The categorical imperative is at the center of the philosophical concept as espoused in the moral philosophy of Kant and it may be used as a way of determining the motivations that bring about the actions of human beings. Kant's view is that all human beings occupy an unusual place in the creation, and this makes them immensely rational creatures that were given the…
6 pages (1506 words)
Relationship between Morality and Happiness based on Kant and Mill
It is important to note that the question raises other questions based on logic. For example, in the modern world, should morality be influenced by actions that take into consideration the greatest number of people affected; or should the rationale of morality focus on logic and other personal beliefs? Juxtaposing Kant’s and Mill’s ideas reveals the philosophical relation between their arguments clearly albeit with a lot of effort. The ideology of metaphysics was a major avenue of study followed by Immanuel Kant. Metaphysics is the philosophical study of a person’s know how and being.…
8 pages (2008 words)
Kant, Mill, and Nietzsche
However, Kant and Mill also differ in a sense that Kant states that a person’s moral is innate as in a priori reasoning and Mill suggests, however selfishly, that morals are essential to a person’s happiness as people abide to morals for them to be happy. Now, for Nietzsche being good – at least morally good, is a social construct as the upper class and the people who are in control are defining the word with their preferences and activities. It can change as to who controls the social power. With this notion, evil, or bad, is also arbitrary, as the social class also determines which are…
3 pages (753 words)
Kant and Mill Ideologies
Indeed, Mill claims that people should value the principle of utility as a tool that derives secondary moral principles, which promote general happiness. The fundamental principle of morality means that happiness is intended pleasure and absence of pain where right actions promote happiness while wrong actions produce the reverse of happiness, which is unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure. As such, we can judge people’s actions based on the secondary principles, which promote general happiness. On the other hand, Immanuel Kant defines the fundamental principle of morality as the…
4 pages (1004 words)