Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

a discussion between two characters--about moral relativism - Research Paper Example

Free
College
Research Paper
Philosophy
Pages 2 (502 words)
Download 1

Summary

Ethics,a set of rules in a society that regulates people’s behaviour by defining wrongs and rights in a society,is a fundamental aspect of people’s behaviour.Different ethical theories exist to explain people’s behaviours …

Extract of sample
a discussion between two characters--about moral relativism

Relativism is one of the available ethical theories and I, in this paper, write a dialogue between two individuals, James and Jenifer, about ethical relativism. Jenifer: The relativism approach to ethics is an interesting and confusing one because it seems to blur the clarity in defining a wrong or a right but does not affect determinants of scopes of action. It is however a good ethical approach that understand conditions into actions. What is your perception on factors such as manners, etiquette, and the law? Are your definitions consistent with the relativism’s approach to determination of ethics? James: Many people concur with your opinion that relativism is a controversial approach to ethics and only people who purpose to justify their otherwise seemingly immoral acts express comfort with the theory. Manners define people’s approach to doing things and should be understood from a macro-social perspective with concepts of cultural values. This means that manners should fairly be constant over a period in a society and identify a significant level of absoluteness in defining wrongs and rights. My understanding of etiquette also involves a macro-social concept that defines courteous behaviours among members of a society or a group of individuals and relies on the group’s common and fundamental values. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Relativism-Religion
In the modern America, most university students endure a level of intellectual frustration through his academic years. This book provides an understanding of the utility of ancient philosophy and is enriched with true knowledge of mankind’s existence. Bloom’s book portrays a critical view of the modern universities and their education system. Bloom says that the education system fails to stimulate the students as it cannot connect with their aspirations. He has essentially taken a pessimistic view of modern education system as cultivated by university professors. Critics have assessed the…
21 pages (5271 words)
A Distinction Between Practical Anthropology And Moral Philosophy
The works of Kant (1728-1804), a German philosopher, are mostly drawn from the observations and his own ideas on the nature of humans. The major emphasis of this philosopher is on the priori or pure part of the moral philosophy. He strongly believes that in the operation of moral philosophy, the major determinant is inherent in reason and is also revealed through it. The difference between Kant’s moral philosophy and the empirical moral philosophy is that the later is biased towards the posteriori principles or those that are garnered through the observations and experiences of human beings.…
6 pages (1506 words)
Moral Relativism
Moral relativism allows people to give their point of view in accordance what is right and wrong for an individual. It does not limits a person rather offers to make his/her own decision. A professor of Philosophy at Cambridge University, Simon Blackburn describes his own opinion regarding moral relativism "Different opinions, no one authority, and as many 'truths' as there are people or societies or cultures advancing different ways of doing things," According to moral relativism nothing is bad or good but it depends on the situation a person is going through and how he deals with it, it is…
3 pages (753 words)
Cultural Relativism- Critical Analysis Essay
Argument in standard form Premises 1. According to cultural relativists, there are no universal moral principles. 2. Each society has its own different codes of conduct 3. Each moral or code of conduct applies only to the society in question. 4. We should adopt an attitude of tolerance towards the custom practices of other cultures Conclusion There is no objective truth in morality; it is nothing more than socially approved customs in a given culture. Discussion Cultural relativism is where each culture or ethnic groups is to be viewed on its customs, behavior on values and norms and not on…
5 pages (1255 words)
Discussion about the human life
Destruction of human life is a consequence of reckless and irresponsible driving amongst many drivers. When people get deployed, sacked or fail to pass their final exams, we get irritated but at least our lives are not endangered. When we are on the road, however, irresponsible motor vehicle drivers are more than irritating: They put our lives at risk and many of us have witnessed careless, reckless, incompetent drivers exchanging lanes, not observing road signs and traffic lights. For example nearly or hitting down pedestrians in a pedestrian crossing. A number of bills to regulate proper use…
3 pages (753 words)
Cultural Relativism
For example, it is considered morally wrong for a Muslim to eat pork while for person from another religion, eating pork has no negative impact on his/her morals. Cultural diversity is the variety of cultures globally and locally too. The different ways in which people dress, their religion and also their morality brings about cultural diversity. Respect for cultural diversity is when other people do not interfere or judge people from different ethnic backgrounds as theirs, or when they fail to understand why other peopled do what they do. As opposed to cultural relativism where different…
4 pages (1004 words)
Morality&Cultural Ethical Relativism
In particular, taking into considerations the interests of others too is morally right because morality is the art of doing right to others. Therefore, sharing is imperative because it is also a moral philosophy, which can help others to benefit from something even if it is little. From the Christian philosophical perspective, self interest aspect is viewed as self love or duty to self or saving one’s soul or other aspects but this does not necessarily mean that people should refuse to share with others. Sharing is one way of fulfilling self interest since it can help in saving other people.…
5 pages (1255 words)